Graduate students' administration and scoring errors on the Woodcock-Johnson III tests of Cognitive Abilities

Psychology in the Schools

Volumn 46, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 650-657

  Ramos, Erica ^a   Alfonso, Vincent C ^a   Schermerhorn, Susan M ^b  

^a FORDHAM UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Irvington Union Free School District   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 68049139369     PISSN: 00333085     EISSN: 15206807     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pits.20405     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Alfonso, V. C., Johnson, A., Patinella, L.,&Rader, D. E. (1998). Common WISC-III examiner errors: Evidence from graduate students in training. Psychology in the Schools, 35, 119-125.
2. Alfonso, V. C., Oakland, T., LaRocca, R., & Spanakos, A. (2000). The course on individual cognitive assessment. School Psychology Review, 29, 52-64.
3. Alfonso, V. C., & Pratt, S. I. (1997). Issues and suggestions for training professionals in assessing intelligence. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 326-344). New York: Guilford.
4. Braden, J. P.,&Alfonso,V. C. (2003). The Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Cognitive Abilities in cognitive assessment courses. In F. A. Schrank & D. P. Flanagan (Eds.), WJ III clinical use and interpretation: Scientists-practitioner perspectives (pp. 377-415). San Diego: Academic Press.
5. Elliot, C. D. (2007). Differential Ability Scales, Second Edition (DAS-II). San Antonio, TX: Pearson Education.
6. Hunnicutt, L. C., Slate, J. R., & Gamble, C. (1990). Examiner errors on the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children: A preliminary investigation. Journal of School Psychology, 28, 271-278.
7. Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2004). Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children, Second Edition (KABC-II). San Antonio, TX: Pearson Education.
8. Loe, S. A., Kadlubek, R. M., & Marks, W. J. (2007). Administration and scoring errors on the WISC-IV among graduate student examiners. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 25, 237-247.
9. Mather, N., & Kaufman, N. (Eds.). (2006a). Special issue, part one: Integration of cognitive assessment and response to intervention [Special issue]. Psychology in the Schools, 43(7).
10. Mather, N., & Kaufman, N. (Eds.). (2006b). Special issue, part two: Integration of cognitive assessment and response to intervention [Special issue]. Psychology in the Schools, 43(8).
11. McGrew, K., & Flanagan, D. (1998). The Intelligence Test Desk Reference: Gf-Gc cross-battery assessment. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
12. Oakland, T. D., & Zimerman, S. A. (1986). The course on individual mental assessment: A national survey of course instructors. Professional School Psychology, 1, 51-59.
13. Piotrowski, C., & Zalewski, C. (1993). Training in psychodiagnostic testing in APA-approved Psy.D. and Ph.D. clinical psychology programs. Journal of Personality Assessment, 61, 394-405.
14. Roid, G. H. (2003). Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, Fifth Edition (SB5). Itasca, IL: Riverside.
15. Schermerhorn, S. M., & Alfonso, V. C. (2002). Graduate student administration and scoring errors on the Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Cognitive Abilities. Unpublished manuscript.
16. Sherrets, S., Gard, G., & Langner, H. (1979). Frequency of clerical errors on WISC protocols. Psychology in the Schools, 16, 495-496.
17. Slate, J. R., & Chick, D. (1989). WISC-R examiner errors: Cause for concern. Psychology in the Schools, 26, 78-83.
18. Slate, J. R., & Jones, C. H. (1990). Student error in administering the WISC-R: Identifying problem areas. Measurement & Evaluation in Counseling & Development, 23, 137-140.
19. Slate, J. R., Jones, C. H., Coulter, C., & Covert, T. L. (1992). Practitioners' administration and scoring of the WISC-R: Evidence that we do err. Journal of School Psychology, 30, 77-82.
20. Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Cognitive Abilities. Itasca, IL: Riverside.