Comparison of shank-and drip-applied methyl bromide alternatives in Perennial crop field nurseries

HortTechnology

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 331-339

  Schneider, S M ^a   Hanson, B D ^b   Gerik, J S ^b   Shrestha, A ^c   Trout, T J ^b   Gao, S ^b  

^a AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^b AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^c CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

1, 3 dichloropropene; Chloropicrin; Fumigation; Iodomethane; Meloidogyne; Methyl bromide; Nematode; Soilborne pathogens

Indexed keywords

MELOIDOGYNE; MELOIDOGYNE JAVANICA; NEMATODA; PRUNUS; ROSA MULTIFLORA; TYLENCHORHYNCHUS;

EID: 68049133003     PISSN: 10630198     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.21273/hortsci.19.2.331     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Ajwa, H.A. and T. Trout. 2004. Drip application of alternative fumigants to methyl bromide for strawberry production. HortScience 39:1707-1715.
2. Ajwa, H.A., T. Trout, J. Mueller, S. Wilhelm, S.D. Nelson, R. Soppe, and D. Shatley. 2002. Application of alternative fumigants through drip irrigation systems. Phytopathology 92:1349-1355.
3. Barker, K.R. 1985. Nematode extraction and bioassays, p. 19-35. In: K.R. Barker, C.C. Carter, and J.N. Sasser (eds.). An advanced treatise on Meloidogyne volumeII: Methodology. North Carolina State University Graphics, Raleigh, NC.
4. Becker, J.O., H.D. Ohr, N.M. Grech, and M.E. McGiffen, Jr., and J.J. Sims, 1998. Evaluation of methyl iodide as a soil fumigant in container and small field plot studies. Pestic. Sci. 52:58-62.
5. California Department of Food and Agriculture. 2002. Approved treatment and handling procedures to ensure against nematode pest infestation of nursery stock. Nursery Inspection Procedures Manual, Item#7. 17Nov. 2008. .
6. California Department of Pesticide Regulation. 2002. California management plan: 1, 3-Dichloropropene. 17 Nov. 2008. .
7. De Cal, A., A. Martinez-Treceno, J.M. Lopez-Aranda, and P. Melgarejo. 2004. Chemical alternatives to methyl bromide in Spanish strawberry nurseries. Plant Dis. 88:210-214.
8. Dreistadt, S.H. 2001. Diseases, p. 69-130. In: M.L. Flint (ed.). Integrated pest management for floriculture and nurseries. Publication 3402. University of California, Oakland, CA.
9. Duniway, J.M. 2002. Status of chemical alternatives to methyl bromide for preplant fumigation of soil. Phytopathology 92:1337-1343.
10. Eayre, C.G., J.J. Sims, H.D. Ohr, and B. Mackey. 2000. Evaluation of methyl iodide for control of peach replant disorder. Plant Dis. 84:1177-1179.
11. Flegg, F.F.M. and D.F. Hooper. 1970. Laboratory methods for work with plant and soil nematodes, p. 5-22. In: J.F. Southey (ed.). Tech. Bul. 2. Ministry of Agriculture, Fish and Food, London.
12. Gamliel, A., A. Grinstein, Y. Peretz, L. Klein, A. Nachmias, L. Tsror, L. Livescu, and J. Katan. 1997. Reduced dosage of methyl bromide for controlling verticillium wilt of potato in experimental and commercial plots. Plant Dis. 81:469-474.
13. Gao, S., T.J. Trout, and S. Schneider. 2008. Evaluation of fumigation and surface seal methods on fumigant emissions in an orchard replant field. J. Environ. Qual. 37:369-377.
14. Gerik, J.S. 2005. Drip-applied soil fumigation for freesia production. HortTechnology 15:820-824.
15. Gilreath, J., B. Santos, T. Motis, J. Noling, and J. Mirusso. 2005. Methyl bromide alternatives for nematode and Cyperus control in bell pepper (Capsicum annuum). Crop Prot. 24:903-908.
16. Hanson, B.D. and S.A. Schneider. 2008. Evaluation of weed control and crop safety with herbicides in open field tree nurseries. Weed Technol. 22:493-498.
17. Horowitz, M. and R.B. Taylorson. 1985. Behavior of hard and permeable seeds of Abutilon theophrasti Medic. (velvetleaf). Weed Res. 25:363-372.
18. Huisman, O.C. and L.J. Ashworth, Jr. 1974. Quantitative assessment of Verticillium albo-atrum in field soils: Procedural and substrate improvements. Phytopathology 64:1043-1044.
19. Jenkins, W.R. 1964. A rapid centrifugalflotation technique for separating nematodes from soil. Plant Dis. Rptr. 48:692.
20. Johnson, D.E., B. Lear, S.T. Miyagawa, and R.H. Sciaroni. 1969. Multiple applications of 1, 2-dibromo-3-chloropropane for control of nematodes in established rose plantings. PlantDis. Reptr. 53:34-37.
21. Karlik, J.F., J.O. Becker, and U.K. Schuch. 2001. IPM for field-grown rose plants in California. Acta Hort. 547:97-102.
22. Lampinen, B., G. Browne, S. Schneider, A. Shrestha, B. Holtz, and L. Simon. 2005. Alternative pre-plant soil fumigation treatments for deciduous tree crops, Proc. Annu. Intl. Res. Conf. on Methyl Bromide Alternatives and Emissions Reductions. p. 441-446.
23. Mann, R., S. Mattner, R. Gounder, R. Brett, and I. Porter. 2005. Evaluating novel soil fumigants for Australian horticulture, Proc. Annu. Intl. Res. Conf. on Methyl Bromide Alternatives and Emissions Reductions. p. 341-344.
24. Martin, F.N. 1992. The genus Pythium, p. 39-49. In: L.L. Singleton, J.D. Mihail, and C.M. Rush (eds.). Methods for research on soil borne phytopathogenic fungi. American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MN.
25. Martin, F.N. 2003. Development of alternative strategies for management of soilborne pathogens currently controlled with methyl bromide. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 41:325-350.
26. Motis, T.N. and J.P. Gilreath. 2002. Stimulation of nutsedge emergence with chloropicrin, Proc. Annu. Intl. Res. Conf. on Methyl Bromide Alternatives and Emissions Reductions. p. 71-72.
27. Noe, J.P. 1985. Analysis and interpretations of data from nematological experiments, p. 187-196. In: K.R. Barker, C.C. Carter, and J.N. Sasser (eds.). An advanced treatise on Meloidogyne, Volume 2: Methodology. North Carolina State University Graphics, Raleigh, NC.
28. Noling, J., C. Chandler, and J. Gilreath. 2005. Commercial field evaluations of methyl bromide alternatives in Florida strawberry, Proc. Annu. Intl. Res. Conf. on Methyl Bromide Alternatives and Emissions Reductions. p. 81-85.
29. Overman, A.J. 1982. Soil fumigation via drip irrigation under full-bed mulch culture for row crops. Proc. Soil Crop Sci. Soc. Florida 41:153-155.
30. Overman, A.J., A.A. Csizinszky, J.P. Jones, and C.D. Stanley. 1987. Efficacy of metam sodium applied via drip irrigation on tomato. Proc. Soil Crop Sci. Soc. Florida 46:4-7.
31. Roberts, P.A., A.C. Magyarosy, W.C. Matthews, and D.M. May. 1988. Effects of metam sodium applied by drip irrigation on root-knot nematodes, Pythium ultimum, and Fusarium sp. in soil and on carrot and tomato roots. Plant Dis. 72:213-217.
32. Santo, G.S. and B. Lear. 1976. Influence of Pratylenchus vulnus and Meloidogyne hapla on the growth of rootstocks of rose. J. Nematol. 8:18-23.
33. Schneider, S., T. Trout, J. Gerik, A. Shrestha, and R. Rodriquez-Kabana. 2005. Methyl bromide alternatives for perennial crop-field nurseries, Proc. Annu. Intl. Res. Conf. on Methyl Bromide Alternatives and Emissions Reductions. p. 411-414.
34. Schneider, S.M., T. Trout, J. Gerik, and H. Ajwa. 2004. Perennial crop nurseries: performance of methyl bromide alternatives in the field, Proc. Annu. Intl. Res. Conf. onMethyl Bromide Alternatives and Emissions Reductions. p. 291-294.
35. United Nations Environment Programme. 1999. TheMontreal Protocol on substances that deplete the ozone layer as adjusted and amended in London 1990, Copenhagen 1992, Vienna 1995, Montreal 1997, Beijing 1999. 17Nov. 2008.http://ozone.unep.org/Publications/MP-Handbook/Section-1. 1-The-Montreal-Protocol.
36. Voisin, R., J.C. Minot, D. Esmenjaud, Y. Jacob, G. Pelloli, and S. Aloisi. 1995. Host suitability of rose rootstocks to the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne hapla using a high-inoculum-pressure test. Acta Hort. 424:237-239.
37. Wang, D. and S.R. Yates. 1999. Spatial and temporal distributions of 1, 3- dichloropropene in soil under drip and shank application and implications for pest control efficacy using concentration- time index. Pestic. Sci. 55:154-160.