Enactment effects and integration processes in younger and older adults' memory for actions

Memory

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 374-385

  Feyereisen, Pierre ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Ageing; Associative memory; Motor activity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GESTURE; HUMAN; MALE; MEMORY; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECALL; RECOGNITION; SCORING SYSTEM; SEMANTICS; TASK PERFORMANCE; VERBAL COMMUNICATION; ADOLESCENT; AGE; AGING; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; LEARNING; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AGING; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; FEMALE; GESTURES; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SEMANTICS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 68049125011     PISSN: 09658211     EISSN: 14640686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09658210902731851     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Cohen, G., & Faulkner, D. (1989). Age differences in source forgetting: Effects on reality monitoring and on eyewitness testimony. Psychology and Aging, 4, 1-8.
2. Cohen, R. L., & Otterbein, N. (1992). The mnemonic effect of speech gestures: Pantomimic and non-pantomimic gestures compared. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4, 113-139.
3. Craik, F. I. M., & McDowd, J. M. (1987). Age differences in recall and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 474-479.
4. Earles, J. L., Kersten, A. W., Turner, J. M., & McMullen, J. (1999). Influences of age, performance, and item relatedness on verbatim and gist recall of verb-noun pairs. Journal of General Psychology, 126, 97-110.
5. Engelkamp, J. (1998). Memory for actions. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
6. Engelkamp, J. (2001a). Action memory: A system-oriented approach. In H. D. Zimmer, R. L. Cohen, M. J. Guynn, J. Engelkamp, R. Kormi-Nouri, & M. A. Foley (Eds.), Memory for action: A distinct form of episodic memory? (pp. 49-96). New York: Oxford University Press.
7. Engelkamp, J. (2001b). What does it mean that the motor component is not crucial? Comments on Kormi-Nouri and Nilsson. In H. D. Zimmer, R. L. Cohen, M. J. Guynn, J. Engelkamp, R. Kormi-Nouri, & M. A. Foley (Eds.), Memory for action: A distinct form of episodic memory? (pp. 144-150). New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Engelkamp, J., & Dehn, D. M. (2000). Item and order information in subject-performed tasks and experimenter-performed tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 671-682.
9. Engelkamp, J., & Jahn, P. (2003). Lexical, conceptual and motor information in memory for action phrases: A multi-system account. Acta Psychologica, 113, 147-165.
10. Englekamp, J., & Zimmer, H.D. (1997). Sensory factors in memory for subject-performed tasks. Acta Psychologica, 96, 43-60.
11. Feyereisen, P. (2006). Further investigations on the mnemonic effects of gestures: Their meaning matters. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18, 185-205.
12. Godeau, V. (2003). Effets de la mise en acte dans la mémorisation de phrases chez la personne jeune et chez la personne âgée [Effects of enactment on sentence memory by younger and older persons]. Unpublished Master's dissertation, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve.
13. Grèzes, J., & Decety, J. (2001). Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: A meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 12, 1-19.
14. Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1979). Automatic and effortful processes in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 416-449.
15. Hornstein, S. L., & Mulligan, N. W. (2004). Memory for actions: Enactment and source memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11 367-372.
16. Hunt, R. R., & McDaniel, M. A. (1993). The enigma of organization and distinctiveness. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 421-445.
17. Jeannerod, M. (1999). To act or not to act: Perspectives on the representation of action. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 1-29.
18. Kahana, M. J. (2000). Contingency analyses of memory. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 59-72). New York: Oxford University Press.
19. Knopf, M., Mack, W., Lenel, A., & Ferrante, S. (2005). Memory for action events: Findings in neurological patients. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 46, 11-19.
20. Kormi-Nouri, R. (1995). The nature of memory for action events: An episodic integration view. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 7, 337-363.
21. Kormi-Nouri, R., & Nilsson, L-G. (1998). The role of integration in recognition failure and action memory. Memory and Cognition, 26 681-691.
22. Kormi-Nouri, R., & Nilsson, L-G. (2001). The motor component is not crucial! In H. D. Zimmer, R. L. Cohen, M. J. Guynn, J. Engelkamp, R. Kormi-Nouri, & M. A. Foley (Eds.), Memory for action: A distinct form of episodic memory? (pp. 97-111). New York: Oxford University Press.
23. Mangels, J. A., & Heinberg, A. (2006). Improved episodic integration through enactment: Implications for aging. Journal of General Psychology, 133, 37-65.
24. McDaniel, M. A., Einstein, G. O., & Jacoby, L. L. (2008). New considerations in aging and memory. The glass may be half full. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), The handbook of aging and cognition, third edition (pp. 251-310). New York/Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
25. Molander, B., & Arar, L. (1998). Norms for 439 action events: Familiarity, emotionality, motor activity, and memorability. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 39, 275-300.
26. Naveh-Benjamin, M. (2000). Adult age differences in memory performance: Tests of an associative deficit hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1170-1187.
27. Nilsson, L-G. (2000). Remembering actions and words. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 137-148). New York: Oxford University Press.
28. Nilsson, L-G., & Craik, F. I. M. (1990). Additive and interactive effects in memory for subject-performed tasks. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 2, 305-324.
29. Nilsson, L-G., & Gardiner, J. M. (1991). Memory theory and the boundary conditions of the Tulving-Wiseman law. In W. E. Hockley & S. Lewandowsky (Eds.), Relating theory and data: Essays on human memory (pp. 57-74). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
30. Norris, M. P., & West, R. L. (1990). Adult age differences in activity memory: Cue and strategy utilization. In T. M. Hess (Ed.), Aging and cognition: Knowledge organization and utilization (pp. 1-31). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
31. Old, S. R., & Naveh-Benjamin, M. (2008). Differential effects of age on item and associative measures of memory: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 23, 104-118.
32. Rabinowitz, J. C. (1984). Aging and recognition failure. Journal of Gerontology, 39, 65-71.
33. Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169-192.
34. Rönnlund, M., Nyberg, L., Bäckman, L., & Nilsson, L-G. (2003). Recall of subject-performed tasks, verbal tasks, and cognitive activities across the adult life span: Parallel age-related deficits. Aging, Neuropsychology and Cognition, 10, 182-201.
35. Salthouse, T. A. (1991). Theoretical perspectives on cognitive aging Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
36. Steffens, M. C. (2007). Memory for goal-directed sequences of actions: Is doing better than seeing? Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14, 1194-1198.
37. Von Essen, J. D. (2005). Enactment enhances integration between verb and noun, but not relational processing, in episodic memory. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 46, 315-321.
38. Wahlsten, D. (1991). Sample size to detect a planned contrast and a one degree-of-freedom interaction effect. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 587-595.
39. Zimmer, H. D. (2001). Why do actions speak louder than words? Action memory as a variant of encoding manipulation or the result of a specific memory system? In H. D. Zimmer, R. L. Cohen, M. J. Guynn, J. Engelkamp, R. Kormi-Nouri, & M. A. Foley (Eds.), Memory for action: A distinct form of episodic memory? (pp. 151-198). New York: Oxford University Press.
40. Zimmer, H. D., & Cohen, R. L. (2001). Remembering actions: A specific type of memory? In H. D. Zimmer, R. L. Cohen, M. J. Guynn, J. Engelkamp, R. Kormi-Nouri, & M. A. Foley (Eds.), Memory for action: A distinct form of episodic memory? (pp. 3-24). New York: Oxford University Press.
41. Zimmer, H. D., & Engelkamp, J. (1999). Levels-of-processing effects in subject-performed tasks. Memory and Cognition, 27, 907-914.