Lessons learned from the analysis of 200 laparoscopic sigmoid resections for diverticulitis

Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 123-127

  Zehetner, Jörg ^a   Szabo, Kornel ^a   Wayand, Wolfgang ^a   Shamiyeh, Andreas ^a  

^a LUDWIG BOLTZMANN INSTITUTE FOR LUNG VASCULAR RESEARCH   (Austria)

Author keywords

Diverticulitis; Laparoscopic colon resections; Laparoscopy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ARTICLE; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; BODY MASS; CAUTERIZATION; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLON RESECTION; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DEBRIDEMENT; DIVERTICULITIS; ELECTIVE SURGERY; ENDOSCOPY; ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; GRAFT OCCLUSION; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTESTINAL BLEEDING; IRRIGOSCOPY; LAPAROSCOPIC SIGMOIDECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORBIDITY; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REOPERATION; SIGMOIDECTOMY; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL DRAINAGE; SURGICAL INFECTION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT INDICATION; WOUND DRAINAGE; AUSTRIA; COLONOSCOPY; DATA BASE; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; MIDDLE AGED; SIGMOID; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AUSTRIA; COLON, SIGMOID; COLONOSCOPY; DATABASES AS TOPIC; DIVERTICULITIS; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 68049124814     PISSN: 15304515     EISSN: 15344908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181a091eb     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Gonzalez R, Smith CD, Mattar SG, et al. Laparoscopic versus open resection for the treatment of diverticular disease. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:276-280.
2. Guller U, Jain N, Hervey S, et al. Laparoscopic versus open colectomy: outcomes comparison based on large nationwide databases. Arch Surg. 2003;138:1179-1186.
3. Schwenk W, Bohm B, Haase O, et al. Laparoscopic versus conventional colorectal resection: a prospective randomised study of postoperative ileus and early postoperative feeding. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 1998;383:49-55.
4. Senagore AJ. Laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease. Surg Clin North Am. 2005;85:19-24. vii.
5. Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lam SC, et al. Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial. Lancet. 2004;363:1187-1192.
6. Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;359:2224-2229.
7. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2050-2059.
8. Weeks JC, Nelson H, Gelber S, et al. Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2002;287:321-328.
9. Veldkamp R, Gholghesaei M, Bonjer HJ, et al. Laparoscopic resection of colon Cancer: consensus of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Surg Endosc. 2004;18:1163-1185.
10. Ceccarelli G, Casciola L, Nati S, et al. Neoplastic residues in the trocar tract in oncologic laparoscopic surgery. Minerva Chir. 2004;59:243-248.
11. Janson M, Bjorholt I, Carlsson P, et al. Randomized clinical trial of the costs of open and laparoscopic surgery for colonic cancer. Br J Surg. 2004;91:409-417.
12. Degiuli M, Mineccia M, Bertone A, et al. Outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:427-432.
13. Austin MT, Feurer ID, Holzman MD, et al. The impact of a laparoscopic colorectal surgeon on the laparoscopic colectomy experience of a single academic center. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:311-315. [Epub 2005 Jan 13]
14. Caravati F, Ceriani F, Moroni M, et al. The learning curve in laparoscopic resections of the colon and rectum: results and considerations. Chir Ital. 2003;55:199-206.
15. Ballantyne GH, Leahy PF. Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: evolution to a clinically useful technique. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:753-765.
16. Kang JC, Chung MH, Chao PC, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy vs open colectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:577-581.
17. Casillas S, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ, et al. Does conversion of a laparoscopic colectomy adversely affect patient outcome? Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:1680-1685.
18. Le Moine MC, Fabre JM, Vacher C, et al. Factors and consequences of conversion in laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease. Br J Surg. 2003;90:232-236.
19. Moloo H, Mamazza J, Poulin EC, et al. Laparoscopic resections for colorectal cancer: does conversion survival? Surg Endosc. 2004;18:732-735.
20. Natarajan S, Ewings EL, Vega RJ. Laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy after acute diverticulitis: when to operate? Surgery. 2004;136:725-730.
21. Dincler S, Koller MT, Steurer J, et al. Multidimensional analysis of learning curves in laparoscopic sigmoid resection: eight-year results. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46:1371-1378; discussion 1378-1379.
22. Schwandner O, Farke S, Bruch HP. Laparoscopic colectomy for diverticulitis is not associated with increased morbidity when compared with non-diverticular disease. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2005;20:165-172.
23. Kercher KW, Nguyen TH, Harold KL, et al. Plastic wound protectors do not affect wound infection rates following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:148-151.
24. Delaney CP, Kiran RP, Senagore AJ, et al. Case-matched comparison of clinical and financial outcome after laparoscopic or open colorectal surgery. Ann Surg. 2003;238:67-72.
25. Leroy J, Ananian P, Rubino F, et al. The impact of obesity on technical feasibility and postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic left colectomy. Ann Surg. 2005;241:69-76.