A multilaminate framework for modelling induced and inherent anisotropy of soils

Geotechnique

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 87-101

  Schweiger, H F ^a   Wiltafsky, C ^a,b   Scharinger, F ^a,b   Galavi, V ^a  

^a GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

^b Garber Dalmatiner and Partners   (Austria)

Author keywords

Anisotropy; Constitutive relations; Plasticity; Slopes

Indexed keywords

ASSOCIATED FLOW RULE; CONSTITUTIVE RELATIONS; EXPERIMENTAL DATA; FAILURE SURFACE; FLOW RULES; INDUCED ANISOTROPY; INHERENT ANISOTROPY; INTEGRATION RULE; MATERIAL PARAMETER; MATHEMATICAL FORMULATION; MECHANICAL BEHAVIOUR; MOHR-COULOMB; NON-ASSOCIATED FLOW RULE; OVERCONSOLIDATED SOILS; PLASTIC POTENTIAL FUNCTION; PRINCIPAL STRESS; SAMPLING PLANES; SLOPE STABILITY ANALYSIS; SLOPES; SOFT CLAYS; STRESS STRAIN BEHAVIOURS; STRUCTURAL TENSORS; THREE-DIMENSIONAL STRESS; TRIAXIAL STRESS PATH; TRIAXIAL TEST; UNDRAINED; VOLUMETRIC YIELD; YIELD SURFACE;

ANISOTROPY; CEMENTS; CLAY MINERALS; CONSTITUTIVE MODELS; FUNCTIONS; PLASTICITY; SLOPE STABILITY; SOILS; STRESSES; SURFACES;

GEOLOGIC MODELS;

ANISOTROPY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; NUMERICAL MODEL; OVERCONSOLIDATION; PLASTICITY; SHEAR STRESS; SLOPE STABILITY; SOIL PROFILE; STRESS-STRAIN RELATIONSHIP; TRIAXIAL TEST;

EID: 68049083814     PISSN: 00168505     EISSN: 00168505     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1680/geot.2008.3770     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Bažant, Z. P. & Oh, B. H. (1985). Microplane model for progressive fracture of concrete and rock. J. Engng Mech. 111, No. 4, 559-582.
2. Bažant, Z. P. & Prat, P. C. (1988). Microplane model for brittleplastic material: I. theory. J. Engng Mech. 114, No. 10, 1672-1688.
3. Bažant, Z. P., Caner, F. C., Adley, M. D. & Akers, S. A. (2000). Microplane model M4 for concrete I. J. Engng Mech. ASCE 126, No. 9, 944-953.
4. Brinkgreve, R. B. J. (2002). PLAXIS, finite element code for soil and rock analyses: User manual. Rotterdam: Balkema.
5. Calladine, C. R. (1971). A microstructural view of the mechanical properties of saturated clay. Géotechnique 21, No. 4, 391-415.
6. Casagrande, A. & Carrillo, N. (1944). Shear failure of anisotropic soils. J. Boston Soc. Civ. Engrs Contrib. Soil Mech. 1941-1953, 1944, 122-135
7. Cudny, M. & Vermeer, P. A. (2004). On the modelling of anisotropy and destructuration of soft clays within the multilaminate framework. Comput. Geotech. 31, No. 1, 1-22.
8. Fliege, J. & Maier, U. (1996). A two-stage approach for computing cubature formulae for the sphere. Ergebnisberichte Angewandte Mathematik, Fachbereich Mathematik, Dortmund University, Germany, No. 139T.
9. Koskinen, M. (2001). Anisotropy and destructuration of soft clays. MSc thesis, Helsinki University of Technology, Helsinki, Finland.
10. Krajewski, W. (1986). Mathematisch-numerische und experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Bestimmung der Tragfähigkeit von in Sand gegründeten, vertikal belasteten Pfählen. Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Grundbau, Bodenmechanik, Felsmechanik und Verkehrswasserbau der RWTH Aachen, Heft 13.
11. Kuhl, E., D'Addetta, G. A., Herrmann, H. J. & Ramm, E. (2000). A comparison of discrete granular material models with continuous microplane formulations. J. Granular Matter 2, No. 3, 113-121.
12. Näätänen, A. & Lojander, M. (2000). Modelling of anisotropy of Finnish clays. Proc. 7th Finnish Symp. on Mechanics, Tampere, 589-599.
13. Neher, H. P., Vermeer, P. A. & Bonnier, P. G. (2001). Strain-rate effects in soft soils modelling and application. Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Soft Soil Engineering, Hong Kong, 361-367.
14. Neher, H. P., Cudny, M., Wiltafsky, C. & Schweiger, H. F. (2002). Modelling principal stress rotation effects with multilaminate type constitutive models for clay. Proc. 8th Int. Symp. Numerical Models in Geomechanics (NUMOG), Rome, 41-47.
15. Pande, G. N. & Sharma, K. G. (1983). Multilaminate model of clays: a numerical evaluation of the influence of rotation of the principal stress axes. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech. 7, No. 4, 397-418.
16. Pande, G. N. & Yamada, M. (1994). The multilaminate framework of models for rock and soil masses. Proc. 1st Int. Workshop on Applications of Computational Mechanics in Geotechnical Engineering, Rio de Janeiro, 105-123.
17. Pestana, J. M., Whittle, A. J. & Gens, A. (2002). Evaluation of a constitutive model for clays and sands. Part II: Clay behaviour. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech. 26, No. 11, 1123-1146.
18. Pietruszczak, S. (1999). On inelastic behaviour of anisotropic frictional materials. J. Mech. Cohesive-Frictional Mater. 4, No. 3, 281-293.
19. Pietruszczak, S. & Mroz, Z. (2000). Formulation of anisotropic failure criteria incorporating a microstructure tensor. Comput. Geotech. 26, No. 2, 105-112.
20. Pietruszczak, S. & Pande, G. N. (1987). Multilaminate framework of soil models: plasticity formulation. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 11, No. 6, 651-658.
21. Pietruszczak, S. & Pande, G. N. (2001). Description of soil anisotropy based on multilaminate framework. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech. 25, No. 2, 197-206.
22. Potts, D. M. & Zdravković, L. (1999). Finite element analysis in geotechnical engineering: Theory. London: Thomas Telford.
23. Prat, P. C., Sánchez, F. & Gens, A. (1997). Equivalent continuum anisotropic microplane model for rock: theory and applications to finite element analysis. Proc. 6th Int. Symp. Numerical Models in Geomechanics (NUMOG), Montreal, 159-164.
24. Rowe P. W. (1962). The stress-dilatancy relation for static equilibrium of an assembly of particles in contact. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A 269, 500-557.
25. Sadrnejad, S. A. & Pande, G. N. (1989). A multilaminate model for sands. Proc. 3rd Int. Symp. on Numerical Models in Geomechanics, Niagara Falls, 17-27.
26. Scharinger, F. & Schweiger, H. F. (2005). Undrained response of a double hardening multilaminate model for soils. Proc. 11th Int. Conf. Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics, Turin, 505-512.
27. Scharinger, F., Schweiger, H. F. & Galavi, V. (2005). FE-analysis of deep excavations in lacustrine clay with different constitutive models. Proc. 16th Int. Conf. Soil Mech. Geotech. Engng, Osaka, 971-974.
28. Scharinger, F., Schweiger, H. F. & Pande, G. N. (2008). On a multilaminate model for soil incorporating small-strain stiffness. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech., published ahead of print, 12/05/2008, doi: 10.1002/nag.710.
29. Schuller, H. (2000). A multilaminate model for soils and its application to numerical analysis of tunnel excavation. PhD thesis, Graz University of Technology, Austria.
30. Schuller, H. & Schweiger, H. F. (2002). Application of a multilaminate model to simulation of shear band formation in NATM-tunnelling. Comput. Geotech. 29, No. 7, 501-524.
31. Schweiger, H. F. (2003). Standsicherheitsnachweise für Böschungen und Baugruben mittels FE-Methode durch Abminderung der Scherfestigkeit. In Workshop: Nachweise für Böschungen und Baugruben mit numerischen Methoden (ed. T. Schanz), Schriftenreihe Geotechnik, Vol. 11, pp. 19-36. Bauhaus-Universität Weimar.
32. Schweiger, H. F. & Schuller, H. (2000). New developments and practical applications of the multilaminate model for soils. Proc. John Booker Memorial Symp., Sydney, 329-350.
33. Søreide, O. K. (2003). Mixed hardening models for frictional soils. PhD thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
34. Taylor, G. I. (1938). Plastic strain in metals. J. Inst. Metals 62, 307-324. Reprinted in The Scientific Papers of G. I. Taylor, Vol. 1, 1958. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Vermeer, P. A. & Neher, H. P. (1999). A soft soil model that accounts for creep. In: Brinkgreve, R. B. J. (ed.), Proc. Int. Symp. Beyond 2000 in Computational Geotechnics, Amsterdam, 249-261.
36. Vermeer, P. A., Stolle, D. F. E. & Bonnier, P. G. (1997). From classical theory of secondary compression to modern creep. Proc. 9th Int. Conf. Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics, Wuhan 4, 2469-2478.
37. Wiltafsky, C. (2003). A multilaminate model for normally consolidated clay. PhD thesis, Graz University of Technology, Austria.
38. Wiltafsky, C., Messerklinger, S. & Schweiger, H. F. (2002). An advanced multilaminate model for clay. Proc. 8th Int. Symp. Numerical Models in Geomechanics (NUMOG), Rome, 67-73.
39. Wiltafsky, C., Scharinger, F., Schweiger, H. F., Krenn, H., Zentar, R., Karstunen, M., Cudny, M., Neher, H. & Vermeer, P. A. (2003). Results from a geotechnical benchmark exercises of an embankment on soft clay. Proc. Int. Workshop on Geotechnics of Soft Soil, Noordwijkerhout, 381-388.
40. Zienkiewicz, O. C. & Pande, G. N. (1977). Time dependent multilaminate model of rocks: a numerical study of deformation and failure of rock masses. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech. 1, No. 3, 219-247.
41. Zdravkovic, L. & Potts, D. M. (1999). Advances in modelling soil anisotropy. In Constitutive modelling of granular material (ed. D. Kolymbas), pp. 491-521. Berlin: Springer.