Modelling principal stress rotation effects with multilaminate type constitutive models for clay

Numerical Models in Geomechanics - 8th Proceedings of the International Symposium on Numerical Models in Geomechanics, NUMOG 2002

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages 41-47

  Neher, H P ^a   Cudny, M ^a   Wiltafsky, C ^b   Schweiger, H F ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

^b GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSTITUTIVE MODELS; ELASTICITY; GEOMECHANICS; HARDENING; NUMERICAL MODELS; ROTATION; STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

CONSTITUTIVE RELATIONS; INELASTIC CONTRIBUTIONS; PHYSICAL MEANINGS; PLASTIC EFFECTS; PRINCIPAL STRESS AXES ROTATION; PRINCIPAL STRESS ROTATION; STRESS INVARIANTS; YIELD SURFACE;

SHEAR FLOW;

EID: 68049102893     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1201/9781439833797-c6     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Akagi, H. & Saitoh, J. 1994. Dilatancy characteristics of clayey soil under principal axes rotation. In Shibuya, S., Mitachi, T. & Miura, S. (Eds), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Prefailure Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterial, Volume 1: 311–314, Sapporo. A.A. Balkema.
2. Akagi, H. & Yamamoto, H. 1997. Stress–dilatancy relation of undisturbed clay under principal axes rotation. Deformation and Progressive Failure in Geomechanics: 211–216.
3. Arthur, J.R.F., Chua, K.S., Dunstan, T. & Roderiguez del C., J.I. 1980. Principal stress rotation: a missing parameter. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division ASCE 106(4): 419–433.
4. Bažant, Z.P. & Oh, B.H. 1985. Microplane model for progressive fracture of concrete and rock. Journal of Engineering Mechanics ASCE 11(4): 559–582.
5. Calladine, C.R. 1971.Amicrostructural view of the mechanical properties of saturated clay. Géotechnique 21(4): 391–415.
6. Hight, D.W., Gens, A. & Symes, M.J. 1983. The development of a new hollow cylinder apparatus for investigating the effects of principal stress rotation in soils. Géotechnique 33(4): 355–383.
7. Neher, H.P., Vermeer, P.A. & Bonnier, P.G. 2001. Strain-rate effects in soft soils modelling and application. In Lee, C.F., Lau, C.K., Ng, C.W.W., Kwong, A.K.L., Pang, P.L.R., Yin, J.-H. & Yue, Z.Q. (Eds), Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Soft Soil Engineering: 361–367, Hong Kong, A.A. Balkema.
8. Pande, G.N. & Sharma, K.G. 1983. Multi-laminate model of clays – a numerical evaluation of the influence of rotation of principal stress axes. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech. 7(4): 397–418.
9. Pietruszczak, S. & Pande, G.N. 1987. Multi-laminate framework of soil models – plasticity formulation. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech. 11(6): 651–658.
10. Pietruszczak, S. & Pande, G.N. 2001. Description of soil anisotropy based on multi-laminate framework. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech. 25(2): 197–206.
11. Schweiger, H.F. & Schuller, H. 2000. New developments and practical applications of the multilaminate model for soils. In Smith & Carter (Eds), Proceedings of Developments in Theoretical Geomechanics – John Booker Memorial Symposium, Sydney: 329–350.
12. Taylor, G.I. 1938. Plastic strain in metals. J. Inst. Metals 62: 307–324.
13. Vermeer, P.A. 1978. A double hardening model for sand. Géotechnique 28(4): 413–433.
14. Vermeer, P.A., Stolle, D.F.E. & Bonnier, P.G. 1997. From classical theory of secondary compression to modern creep. In Yuan, J.-X. (Ed.), Proceedings of Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics, Volume 4: 2469–2478, Wuhan, A.A. Balkema.
15. Vermeer, P.A. & Neher, H.P. 1999. A soft soil model that accounts for creep. In Brinkgreve, R.B.J. (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Symposium “Beyond 2000 in Computational Geotechnics”: 249–261, Amsterdam, A.A. Balkema.
16. Wiltafsky, C., Messerklinger, S. & Schweiger, H.F. 2002. An advanced multilaminate model for clay. Submitted for publication, NUMOG VIII, Rome.
17. Zienkiewicz, O.C. & Pande, G.N. 1977. Time-dependent multilaminate model of rocks – a numerical study of deformation and failure of rock masses. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech. 1(3): 219–247.