Robust model updating with insufficient data

Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering

Volumn 198, Issue 37-40, 2009, Pages 3096-3104

  Goller, B ^a   Pradlwarter, H J ^a   Schueller G I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK   (Austria)

Author keywords

Bootstrap method; Kernel density; Model updating; Robustness; Stochastic analysis

Indexed keywords

BOOTSTRAP METHOD; KERNEL DENSITY; MODEL UPDATING; ROBUSTNESS; STOCHASTIC ANALYSIS;

MODAL ANALYSIS; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS;

STOCHASTIC MODELS;

EID: 67949106469     PISSN: 00457825     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2009.05.009     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Abramson I. On bandwidth variation in kernel estimation - a square root law. Ann. Stat. 10 4 (1982) 1217-1223
2. I.M. Babuska, K.J. Dowding, T.L. Paez (Eds.), Validation Challenge Workshop. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 197 (29-32) (2008) 2373-2665.
3. Beck J.L., and Katafygiotis L.S. Updating models and their uncertainties. I: Bayesian statistical framework. J. Engrg. Mech. 128 4 (1998) 380-391
4. Zang C., Schwingshackl C.W., and Ewins D.J. Model validation for structural dynamic analysis: an approach to the Sandia structural dynamics challenge. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 197 29-32 (2008) 2645-2659
5. Calvi A. Uncertainty-based loads analysis for spacecraft: finite element model validation and dynamic responses. Comput. Struct. 83 14 (2005) 1103-1112
6. Datta B.N. Finite-element model updating, eigenstructure assignment and eigenvalue embedding techniques for vibrating systems. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 16 1 (2002) 83-96
7. Dowding K.J., Red-Horse J.R., Paez T.L., Babuska I.M., Hills R.G., and Tempone R. Validation challenge workshop summary. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 197 29-32 (2008) 2381-2384
8. Fonseca J.R., Friswell M.I., Mottershead J.E., and Lees A.W. Uncertainty identification by the maximum likelihood method. J. Sound Vib. 288 3 (2005) 587-599
9. Foster P. A comparative-study of some bias correction techniques for kernel-based density estimators. J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 51 2-4 (1995) 137-152
10. Friswell M.I., and Mottershead J.E. Finite Element Model Updating in Structural Dynamics (1995), Kluwer Academic Publishers
11. M.I. Friswell, J.E. Mottershead, C. Mares, Stochastic model updating in structural dynamics, in: M. Papadrakakis, D.C. Charmpis, N.D. Lagaros, Y. Tsompanakis (Eds.), ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Rethymno, Greece, 2007.
12. Ghanem R.G., Doostan A., and Red-Horse J. A probabilistic construction of model validation. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 197 29-32 (2008) 2585-2595
13. Hall P., Hu T.C., and Marron J.S. Improved variable window kernel estimates of probability densities. Ann. Stat. 23 1 (1995) 1-10
14. Hasselman T., and Lloyd G. A top-down approach to, calibration, validation, uncertainty quantification and predictive accuracy assessment. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 197 29-32 (2008) 2596-2606
15. Horta L.G., Kenny S.P., Crespo L.G., and Elliott K.B. NASA Langley's approach to the Sandia's structural dynamics challenge problem. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 197 29-32 (2008) 2607-2620
16. Jaynes E.T. Prior probabilities. IEEE Trans. Syst. Sci. Cybern. SSC4 3 (1968) 227-241
17. Katafygiotis L.S., and Beck J.L. Updating models and their uncertainties. II: Model identifiability. J. Engrg. Mech. 124 4 (1998) 463-467
18. McFarland J., and Mahadevan S. Error and variability characterization in structural dynamics modeling. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 197 29-32 (2008) 2621-2631
19. Oberkampf W.L., and Barone M.F. Measures of agreement between computation and experiment: validation metrics. J. Comput. Phys. 217 1 (2006) 5-36
20. The American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Guide for the verification and validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations, AIAA Standards Series (G-077), 1998.
21. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Guide for verification and validation in computational solid mechanics, ASME V&V (10), 2006.
22. Paez T.L., and Red-Horse J.R. Structural dynamics challenge problem: summary. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 197 29-32 (2008) 2660-2665
23. Park G.-J., Lee T.-H., Lee K.H., and Hwang K.-H. Robust design: an overview. AIAA J. 44 1 (2006) 181-191
24. Pradlwarter H.J., and Schuëller G.I. The use of kernel densities and confidence intervals to cope with insufficient data in validation experiments. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 197 29-32 (2008) 2550-2560
25. Red-Horse J.R., and Paez T.L. Sandia National Laboratories validation workshop: structural dynamics application. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 197 29-32 (2008) 2578-2584
26. Hills R.G., Pilch M., Dowding K.J., Red-Horse J., Paez T.L., Babuska I., and Tempone R. Validation challenge workshop. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 197 29-32 (2008) 2375-2380
27. V.J. Romero, Type X and Y errors and data and model conditioning for systematic uncertainty in model calibration, validation, and extrapolation. Technical Report 2008-01-1368, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification Process Department, Sandia National Laboratories, 2008.
28. R.Y. Rubinstein, D.P. Kroese, Simulation and the Monte Carlo Method, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, 2008.
29. Rutherford B.M. Computational modeling issues and methods for the regulatory problem in engineering - solutions to the structural dynamics and static frame problems. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 197 29-32 (2008) 2632-2644