A top-down approach to calibration, validation, uncertainty quantification and predictive accuracy assessment

Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering

Volumn 197, Issue 29-32, 2008, Pages 2596-2606

  Hasselman, Timothy ^a   Lloyd, George ^a  

^a ACTA Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Accreditation; Calibration; Predictive accuracy assessment; Top down; Uncertainty quantification; Validation

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION; DAMPING; STATISTICAL METHODS; STOCHASTIC MODELS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; VIBRATIONS (MECHANICAL);

PREDICTIVE ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; STOCHASTIC SUBSYSTEM MODEL; UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION;

STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS;

CALIBRATION; DAMPING; STATISTICAL METHODS; STOCHASTIC MODELS; STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; VIBRATIONS (MECHANICAL);

EID: 43049107996     PISSN: 00457825     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2007.07.031     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Hasselman T.K. Quantification of uncertainty in structural dynamic models. ASCE J. Aerosp. Engrg. 14 4 (2001)
2. T.K. Hasselman, R.N. Coppolino, D.C. Zimmerman, Criteria for modeling accuracy: A state of the practice survey, Paper No. 269, in: Proceedings of the 18th International Modal Analysis Conference, San Antonio TX, February 7-9, 2000.
3. MSFC-HDBK-1974, Guidelines for loads analyses and dynamic model verification of shuttle cargo elements, George C. Marshall Space Flight Center, MSFC, AL, October 1991.
4. NASA-STD-5002, Load Analyses of Spacecraft and Payloads, June 1996.
5. DoD Handbook-304A (USAF), Test Requirements for Launch, Upper-stage, and Space Vehicles, vol. II: Applications Guidelines, April 1999.
6. Loeve M. Probability Theory. fourth ed. (1977), Springer-Verlag, New York
7. Silverman B.W. Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis (1990), Chapman & Hall
8. ASME V&V 10-2006, Guide for Verification and Validation in Computational Solid Mechanics, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, 2006.