North carolina tobacco farmers' changing perceptions of tobacco control and tobacco manufacturers

Journal of Rural Health

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 233-239

  Crankshaw, Erik C ^a,d   Beach, Robert H ^a   Austin, W David ^a   Altman, David G ^b   Jones, Alison Snow ^c  

^a RTI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

^b Global Research and Evaluation   (United States)

^c WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

^d NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67949102104     PISSN: 0890765X     EISSN: 17480361     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2009.00224.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Givel MS, Glantz SA. Tobacco lobby political influence on US state legislatures in the 1990s. Tob Control. 2001;10(2):124-134.
2. Pollack HA, Jacobson PD. Political economy of youth smoking regulation. Addiction. 2003;98(Suppl 1):123-138.
3. Morley CP, Cummings KM, Hyland A, Giovino GA, Horan JK. Tobacco Institute lobbying at the state and local levels of government in the 1990s. Tob Control. 2002;11:I102-I109.
4. Tsoukalas TH, Glantz SA. Development and destruction of the first state funded anti-smoking campaign in the USA. Tob Control. 2003;12(2):214-220.
5. Trochimn WMK, Stillman FA, Clark PI, Schmitt CL. Development of a model of the tobacco industry's interference with tobacco control programmes. Tob Control. 2003;12(2):140-147.
6. Merlo E. Philip Morris Tobacco Company legal document produced in the case of: State of Minnesota, et. al v. Philip Morris, Inc., et. all No. Cl-94-8565, 2nd District, Minnesota, Minneapolis: Minnesota Tobacco Document Depository. 1996 Jan. Report No.: Bates No. 2047296451-2047296459.
7. Dowdell JS. Tobacco grower relations. Internal RJ Reynolds memo to WD Hobbs and FH Christopher. 1977 Mar 9. Report No.: Bates No.: 500000418/0422.
8. Tobacco Growers' Information Committee. Putting 14,000 farmers out of work, won't solve the health care crisis. 1993 Sep 20. Report No.: Bates No.: 523170654.
9. American Tobacco. Americans reject FDA tobacco regulation. American Tobacco - The Quarterly Tobacco Issues Newsletter for America's Tobacco Growers. 1995; First Quarter (Bates No. 94817152/7155). Available at: http://legacy.library. ucsf.edu/tid/hxl53c00/pdf. Accessed February 20, 2008.
10. US Census Bureau. Annual Estimates of the resident population for the United States, regions, states, and Puerto Rico: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2008 (NST-EST2008-01). National and State Population Estimates. 2008; Available at: http://www. census.gov/popest/states/NST-ann-est.html.Accessed December 23, 2008.
11. Gale HF, Foreman LCT. Tobacco and the economy: farms, jobs and communities. 2000. Report No.: Economic Research Service, USDA; Agricultural Economic Report No. 789.
12. Butzen AY. An Analysis of the Relationship Between Tobacco Production and Tobacco Use, Tobacco-Related Disease Burden, and Tobacco Prevention Policies. UNC-Chapel Hill, N.C.: Dept.of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health; 2006.
13. Beach RH, Austin WD, Crankshaw EC, Jones AS. Dependence on Tobacco Revenue and Adoption of Comprehensive Tobacco-Free School Policies in North Carolina Counties. 2008. Working Paper, RTI International.
14. Farrelly MC, Nimsch CT. Impact of cigarette excise tax increases in low-tax southern states on cigarette sales, cigarette excise tax revenue, tax evasion, and economic activity. 2003 Jul. Report No.: Report prepared for the Tobacco Technical Assistance Consortium.
15. Jones AS, Austin WD, Beach RH, Altman DG. Funding of North Carolina tobacco control programs through the Master Settlement Agreement. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(1): 36-44.
16. Gross CP, Soffer B, Bach PB, Rajkumar R, Forman HP. State expenditures for tobacco-control programs and the tobacco settlement. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(14):1080-1086.
17. Lineberger L, O'Connor J, Blair NA, et al. Preemptive state smoke-free indoor air laws-United States, 1999-2004. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2005;54(10):250-253.
18. Wilson RW, Higgins CW. Smoking behavior and the tobacco crop. J Sch Health. 1984;54(9):343-346.
19. Noland MP, Kryscio RJ, Riggs RS, Linville LH, Perritt LJ, Tucker TC. Use of snuff, chewing tobacco, and cigarettes among adolescents in a tobacco-producing area. Addict Behav. 1990;15(6):517-530.
20. Higgins CW, Whitley KN, Dunn JD. A comparison of smoking related attitudes and behaviors among Kentucky public school children whose families are and are not involved in tobacco production. J Sch Health. 1984;54(5):185-187.
21. Wilson R, Duncan DF, Nicholson T. Public attitudes toward smoking bans in a tobacco-producing county. South Med J. 2004;97(7):645-650.
22. Altman DG, Levine DW, Howard G, Hamilton H. Tobacco farming and public health: attitudes of the general public and farmers. J Soc Issues. 1997;53(1):113-128.
23. Altman DG, Zaccaro DJ, Levine DW, et al. Predictors of crop diversification: a survey of tobacco farmers in North Carolina (USA). Tob Control. 1998;7(4):376-382.
24. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using Multivariate Statistics. 4th ed. Boston, Mass: Allyn and Bacon; 2001.
25. Beach RH, Jones AS, Tooze J. Tobacco farmer interest and success in income diversification. J Agric Appl Econ. 2008;40(1):53-71.
26. SAS Institute I. SAS Institute PROC GLIMMIX. SAS Institute, Inc 2007; Available at: http://www.sas.com. Accessed November 26, 2007.
27. Jha P. Curbing the Epidemic : Governments and the Economics of Tobacco Control. Washington, DC: World Bank; 1999.
28. Lindblom E. False friends: the US cigarette companies' betrayal of American tobacco farmers. Report to the American Heart Association, American Cancer Society, and Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids 1999; Available at: http://www.tobaccofreekids.org/reports/falsefriends/campaign.pdf. Accessed May 31, 2006.
29. Funding Universe. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc. Company history. Funding Universe com 2000; Available at: http://www.fundinguniverse.com/ company-histories/RJReynolds-Tobacco-Holdings-Inc-Company-History.html. Accessed May 31, 2006.
30. Reeve RH. The changing political environment for tobacco: implications for southern tobacco farmers, rural economies, taxpayers and consumers. J Agric Appl Econ. 1999;31: 323-331.