State expenditures for tobacco-control programs and the tobacco settlement

New England Journal of Medicine

Volumn 347, Issue 14, 2002, Pages 1080-1086

  Gross, Cary P ^a   Soffer, Benny ^a   Bach, Peter B ^b   Rajkumar, Rahul ^a   Forman, Howard P ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH HAZARD; HEALTH PROGRAM; MORBIDITY; MORTALITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SMOKING; TOBACCO DEPENDENCE; UNITED STATES;

HEALTH EXPENDITURES; HEALTH POLICY; HEALTH PROMOTION; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; STATE GOVERNMENT; TOBACCO INDUSTRY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0037015563     PISSN: 00284793     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsa012743     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Kessler DA, Myers ML. Beyond the tobacco settlement. N Engl J Med 2001;345:535-7.
2. Federal Trade Commission Cigarette Report for 1999. Washington, D.C.: Federal Trade Commission, 2001:2-3.
3. King C III, Siegel M. The Master Settlement Agreement with the tobacco industry and cigarette advertising in magazines. N Engl J Med 2001; 345:504-11.
4. Chung PJ, Garfield CF, Rathouz PJ, Lauderdale DS, Best D, Lantos J. Youth targeting by tobacco manufacturers since the Master Settlement Agreement: the first study to document violations of the youth-targeting ban in magazine ads by the three top U.S. tobacco companies. Health Aff (Millwood) 2002;21(2):254-63.
5. All urban consumers. Washington, D.C.: Department of Labor, 2002. (Accessed September 10, 2002, at www.bls.gov/data/home.htm.)
6. McCaffree DR. The "big tobacco" settlement: the ACCP viewpoint. Chest 1998;113:1682-3.
7. Master Settlement Agreement. Washington, D.C.: National Association of Attorneys General, 2002. (Accessed September 10, 2002, at http:// www.naag.org/tobaccopublic/library.cfm.)
8. Fichtenberg CM, Glantz SA. Association of the California Tobacco Control Program with declines in cigarette consumption and mortality from heart disease. N Engl J Med 2000;343:1772-7.
9. Biener L, Harris J, Hamilton W. Impact of the Massachusetts tobacco control programme: population based trend analysis. BMJ 2000;321:351-4.
10. Siegel M, Mowery PD, Pechacek TP, et al. Trends in adult cigarette smoking in California compared with the rest of the United States, 1978-1994. Am J Public Health 2000;90:372-9.
11. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Best practices for comprehensive tobacco control programs, August 1999. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1999.
12. Center for Tobacco Free Kids. Show us the money: a mid-year update on the states' allocation of the tobacco settlement dollars. Washington, D.C.: Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids, July 2002.
13. Farragher T. Up in smoke: little of the $246B deal fights tobacco. Boston Globe. August 9, 2001.
14. Investment in tobacco control: state highlights 2001. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2001:19.
15. Health Policy Tracking Service. State allocation of settlement funds: 1999-2001. Washington, D.C.: National Conference of State Legislatures, 2001.
16. Current cigarette smoking among adults 18 and older, 1999. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2002. (Accessed September 10, 2002, at http: //www2.cdc.gov/nccdphp/osh/state/report_index.htm.)
17. State tobacco activities tracking and evaluation: deaths related to smoking, 1990-94. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2002. (Accessed September 10, 2002, at http://www2.cdc.gov/nccdphp/osh/state/rpt_epi_display.asp?rpt_id=E5.)
18. Cigarette excise taxes. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2002. (Accessed September 10, 2002, at http://www2.cdc.gov/nccdphp/osh/state/report_index.htm.)
19. Ranking tables for states: population in 2000 and population change from 1990 to 2000 (PHC-T-2). Washington, D.C.: Census Bureau, 2002. (Accessed September 10, 2002, at http://www.census.gov/population/www/cen2000/phc-t2.html.)
20. Census Bureau, Mills R. Health insurance coverage. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 2000:10.
21. Bureau of Economic Analysis. Regional accounts data: annual state personal income: summary tables 1929-2000. Washington, D.C.: Department of Commerce, April 2002. (Accessed July 31, 2002, at http:// www.bea.doc.gov/bea/regional/spi/.)
22. Medicaid financial statistics tables (CMS-64 report). Washington, D.C.: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2002. (Accessed September 10, 2002, at http://cms.hhs.gov/medicaid/mbes/m64.asp.)
23. Miller LS, Zhang X, Novotny T, Rice DP, Max W. State estimates of Medicaid expenditures attributable to cigarette smoking, fiscal year 1993. Public Health Rep 1998;113:140-51.
24. National Agriculture Statistics Service. Crop production: 1999 summary. Washington, D.C.: Department of Agriculture, January 2000.
25. Keeler TE, Hu TW, Barnett PG, Manning WG. Taxation, regulation, and addiction: a demand function for cigarettes based on time-series evidence. J Health Econ 1993;12:1-18.
26. Lewitt EM, Coate D. The potential for using excise taxes to reduce smoking. J Health Econ 1982;1:121-45.
27. Wakefield M, Chaloupka F. Effectiveness of comprehensive tobacco control programmes in reducing teenage smoking in the USA. Tob Control 2000;9:177-86.
28. Palca J. Conflict over release of clinical research data. Science 1990; 251:374-5.
29. Finnegan M. Davis' budget plan rebuked by Riordan: proposal to use state's share of tobacco funds to close deficit is similar to the one made by the former L.A. mayor. Los Angeles Times. January 15, 2002:B6.
30. Mansnerus L. Corporate tax deal ends Trenton budget standoff New York Times. July 3, 2002:A1.
31. Kaufman M. Ashcroft signals support of tobacco lawsuit. Washington Post. October 6, 2001:A4.
32. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010. Vol. 2. McLean, Va.: International Medical Publishing, November 2000: 27-1-27-30.