An Efficient and Conservative Hybrid Method for Solving Multidimensional Conservation Laws

Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 1029-1066

  Manzini, Glanmarco ^a,b  

^a CNR   (Italy)

^b CNR   (Italy)

Author keywords

Conservative hybrid method; Eno scheme; Multidimensional conservation laws; Tvd scheme; Weno scheme

Indexed keywords

EID: 67849097123     PISSN: 0749159X     EISSN: 10982426     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/num.20385     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. 1 P. D. Lax, Hyperbolic systems of conservation laws and the mathematical theory of shock waves, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA., 1973. Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics, No. 11.
2. 2 E. Bertolazzi and G. Manzini, Limiting strategies for polynomial reconstructions in the finite volume approximation of the linear advection equation, Appl Numer Math 49 ( 2004), 277–289.
3. 3 B. Engquist and S. Osher, One‐sided difference approximations for non‐linear conservation laws, Math Comp 36 ( 1981), 321–351.
4. 4 S. Osher, Convergence of generalized MUSCL schemes, SIAM J Numer Anal 22 ( 1985), 947–961.
5. 5 A. Harten, B. Engquist, S. Osher, and S. R. Chakravarthy, Uniformly high‐order accurate essentially non‐oscillatory schemes. III, J Comput Phys 71 ( 1987), 231–303.
6. 6 A. Harten, S. Osher, B. Engquist, and S. R. Chakravarthy, An overview of uniformly high‐order essentially non‐oscillatory schemes, J Appl Numer Math 2 ( 1986), 347.
7. 7 G.‐S. Jiang and C.‐W. Shu, Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes, J Comput Phys 126 ( 1996), 202–228.
8. 8 X. Liu, S. Osher, and T. Chan, Weighted essentially non‐oscillatory schemes, J Comput Phys 115 ( 1994), 200–212.
9. 9 D. Levy, G. Puppo, and G. Russo, Compact central WENO schemes for multidimensional conservation laws, SIAM J Sci Comput 22 ( 2000), 656–672.
10. 10 D. Levy, G. Puppo, and G. Russo, A third order central WENO scheme for 2D conservation laws, App Numer Math 33 ( 2000), 415–421.
11. 11 B. Cockburn, C. Johnson, C.‐W. Shu, and E. Tadmor, Advanced numerical approximation of nonlinear hyperbolic equations, A. Quarteroni, editor, Lectures notes in mathematics, vol. 1697, Springer, Berlin, 1998.
12. 12 G.‐S. Jiang and E. Tadmor, Nonoscillatory central schemes for multidimensional hyperbolic conservation laws, SIAM J Sci Comput 19 ( 1998), 1892–1917.
13. 13 A. Kurganov, S. Noelle, and G. Petrova, Semidiscrete central‐upwind schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws and Hamilton‐Jacobi equations, SIAM J Sci Comput 23 ( 2001), 707–740.
14. 14 B. van Leer, Upwind and high‐resolution methods for compressible flow: from donor cell to residual‐distribution schemes, Commun Comput Phys 1 ( 2006), 192–206.
15. 15 I. Chrisite, Upwind compact finite‐difference schemes, J Comput Phys 59 ( 1985), 205–232.
16. 16 M. Sizov, M. Anthonissen, and R. Mattheij, Analysis of local defect correction and high‐order compact finite differences, Numer Methods Partial Differential Eq 22 ( 2006), 128–144.
17. 17 C.‐W. Shu and S. Osher, Efficient implementation of essentially non‐oscillatory shock‐capturing schemes, J Comput Phys 77 ( 1988), 439.
18. 18 C.‐W. Shu and S. Osher, Efficient implementation of essentially non‐oscillatory shock‐capturing schemes, II, J Comput Phys 83 ( 1989), 32–78.
19. 19 R. B. Bauer, A hybrid adaptive ENO scheme, J Comput Phys 136 ( 1997), 180–196.
20. 20 A. Harten, Multi‐resolution algorithms for the numerical solution of hyperbolic conservation laws, Commum Pure Appl Math 48 ( 1995), 1305–1342.
21. 21 E. Harabetian and R. Pego, Nonconservative hybrid shock capturing schemes, J Comput Phys 105 ( 1993), 1–13.
22. 22 T. F. Chan and H. M. Zhou, Adaptive ENO‐wavelet transforms for discontinuous functions, T. Chan, T. Kako, H. Kawarada, and O. Pironneau, editors, 12th International Conference on domain decomposition methods, ddm.org, Chiba (Japan), 2001.
23. 23 D. Kröner, Numerical schemes for conservation laws, Wiley, Chichester, 1997.
24. 24 C.‐W. Shu, Total‐variation‐diminishing time discretizations, SIAM J Sci Statist Comput 9 ( 1988), 1073–1084.
25. 25 C.‐W. Shu, Numerical experiments on the accuracy of ENO and modified ENO schemes, J Sci Comput 5 ( 1990), 127–149.
26. 26 A. Ben‐Israel and T. N. E. Greville, Generalized inverses: Theory and applications, 2nd Ed., Springer Verlag, New York, 2002.
27. 27 S. Gottlieb, C.‐W. Shu, and E. Tadmor, Strong stability‐preserving high‐order time discretization methods, SIAM Rev 43 ( 2001), 89–112.
28. 28 D. Levy, G. Puppo, and G. Russo, On the behavior of the total variation in CWENO methods for conservation laws, App Numer Math 33 ( 2000), 407–414.
29. 29 M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, editors, Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables, Dover Publications Inc., New York, 1992. Reprint of the 1972 edition.
30. 30 N. A. Adams and K. Shariff, A high‐resolution hybrid compact‐ENO scheme for shock‐turbulence interaction problems, J Comput Phys 127 ( 1996), 27–51.
31. 31 R. Davies‐Jones, Comments on a kinematic analysis of frontogenesis associated with a nondivergent vortex, J Atmos Sci 42 ( 1985), 2073–2075.
32. 32 A. V. Titaerev, Derivative Riemann problem and ADER schemes, PhD Thesis, University of Trento, Italy, 2005.