Acquiring Linguistic Structure

Blackwell Handbook of Language Development

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 173-190

  Gerken, Louann ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

Language development; Linguistics; Native language; Phonetics; Syntactic structute

Indexed keywords

EID: 67749147742     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470757833.ch9     Document Type: Chapter

References (66)

1. Aslin, R. N., Pisoni, D. B., & Jusczyk, P. W. (1983). Auditory development and speech perception in infancy. In M. M. Haith & J. J. Campos (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Infant development New York: Wiley.
2. Baker, M. C. (2001). The atoms of language. New York: Basic Books.
3. Best, C. T. (1995). Learning to perceive the sound pattern of English. In C. Rovee-Collier & L. Lipsitt (Eds.), Advances in infancy research (pp. 217-304).Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Co.
4. Braine, M. D. S. (1987). What is learned in acquiring word classes-a step toward an acquisition theory. In B. MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 65-87).Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Chambers, K. E., Onishi, K. H., & Fisher, C. L. (2003). Infants learn phonotactic regularities from brief auditory experience. Cognition, 87, B69-B77.
6. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Chomsky, N. (1980). The linguistic approach. In M. Piattelli-Palmarini (Ed.), Language and learning (pp. 109-116).Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
9. Cumming, W. W., & Berryman, R. (1961). Some data on matching behavior in the pigeon. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 281-284.
10. Cutler, A., & Carter, D. (1987). The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary. Computer Speech and Language, 2, 133-142.
11. Echols, C., Crowhurst, M., & Childers, J. B. (1997). The perception of rhythmic units in speech by infants and adults. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 202-225.
12. Eimas, P., Siqueland, E., Jusczyk, P. W., & Vigorrito, K. (1971). Speech perception in infants. Science, 171, 303-306.
13. Elman, J. (2003). Generalization from sparse input. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14. Fitch, W. T., & Hauser, M. D. (2004). Computational constraints on syntactic processing in a nonhuman primate. Science, 303, 377-380.
15. Frigo, L., & McDonald, J. (1998). Properties of phonological markers that affect the acquisition of gender-like subclasses. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 218-245.
16. Gerken, L. A. (2004). Nine-month-olds extract structural principles required for natural language. Cognition, 93, B89-B96.
17. Gerken, L. A. (2006). Decisions, decisions: Infant language learning when multiple generalizations are possible. Cognition, 98, B67-B74.
18. Gerken, L. A., Wilson, R., & Lewis, W. (2005). 17-month-olds can use distributional cues to form syntactic categories. Journal of Child Language, 32, 249-268.
19. Gerken, L. A., & Zamuner, T. (in press). Exploring the basis for generalization in language acquisition. In J. Cole & J. Hualde (Eds.), LabPhon IX: Change in phonology. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.
20. Giurfa, M., Zhang, S. W., Jenett, A., Menzel, R., & Srinivasan, M. V. (2001). The concepts of "sameness" and "difference" in an insect. Nature, 410, 930-933.
21. Gómez, R. L. (2002). Variability and detection of invariant structure. Psychological Science, 13, 431-436.
22. Gómez, R. L., & Gerken, L. A. (1998, April). Determining the basis of abstraction in artificial language acquisition. Paper presented at the International Society on Infant Studies, Atlanta, GA.
23. Gómez, R. L., & Gerken, L. A. (1999). Artificial grammar learning by 1-year-olds leads to specific and abstract knowledge. Cognition, 70, 109-135.
24. Gómez, R. L., & Gerken, L. A. (2000). Infant artificial language learning and language acquisition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 178-186.
25. Gómez, R. L., & LaKusta, L. (2004). A first step in form-based category abstraction by 12-month-old infants. Developmental Science, 7, 567-580.
26. Guenther, F. H., & Gjaja, M. N. (1996). The perceptual magnet effect as an emergent property of neural map formation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100, 1111-1121.
27. Guest, D. J., Dell, G. S., & Cole, J. S. (2000). Violable constraints in language production: Testing the transitivity assumption of Optimal Theory. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 272-299.
28. Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, T. (2002). The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298, 1569-1579.
29. Hauser, M. D., Newport, E. L., & Aslin, R. N. (2001). Segmentation of the speech stream in a non-human primate: Statistical learning in cotton-top tamarins. Cognition, 78, B53-B64.
30. Hauser, M. D., Weiss, D., & Marcus, G. F. (2002). Rule learning by cotton-top tamarins. Cognition, 86, B15-B22.
31. Hirsh-Pasek, K., Kemler Nelson, D., Jusczyk, P. W., Wright Cassidy, K., Druss, B., & Kennedy, L. (1987). Clauses are perceptual units for prelinguistic infants. Cognition, 26, 269-286.
32. Hogg, R., & McCully, C. B. (1987). Metrical phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Höhle, B., Weissenborn, J., Kiefer, D., Schulz, A., & Schmitz, M. (2004). Functional elements in infants' speech processing: The role of determiners in segmentation and categorization of lexical elements. Infancy, 5, 341-353.
34. Hyams, N. (1986). Language acquisition and the theory of parameters. Dordrecht: Reidel.
35. Jusczyk, P. W. (1985). On characterizing the development of speech perception. In J. Mehler & R. Fox (Eds.), Neonate cognition: Beyond the blooming buzzing confusion Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
36. Jusczyk, P. W., & Aslin, R. N. (1995). Infants' detection of the sound patterns of words in fluent speech. Cognitive Psychology, 29, 1-23.
37. Jusczyk, P. W., Cutler, A., & Redanz, N. (1993). Infants' sensitivity to predominant word stress patterns in English. Child Development, 64, 675-687.
38. Jusczyk, P. W., Friederici, A. D., Wessels, J. M., Svenkerud, V. Y., & Jusczyk, A. M. (1993). Infants' sensitivity to the sound patterns of native language words. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 402-420.
39. Jusczyk, P. W., Luce, P. A., & Charles-Luce, J. (1994). Infants' sensitivity to phonotactic patterns in the native language. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 630-645.
40. Kuhl, P. K., & Miller, J. D. (1975). Speech perception in the chinchilla: Voiced-voiceless distinction in alveolar plosive consonants. Science, 190, 69-72.
41. Kuhl, P. K., Williams, K. A., Lacerda, F., Stevens, K. N., & Lindblom, B. (1992). Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. Science, 255, 606-608.
42. Lewis, J. D., & Elman, J. L. (2001). A connectionist investigation of linguistic arguments from the poverty of the stimulus: Learning the unlearnable. In J. D. Moore & K. Stenning (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 552-557).Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. MacKain, C. (1982). Assessing the role of experience in infant speech discrimination. Journal of Child Language, 9, 527-542.
44. Marcus, G. F., Vijayan, S., Rao, S. B., & Vishton, P. M. (1999). Rule learning by seven-month-old infants. Science, 283, 77-80.
45. Maye, J., & Gerken, L. A. (2001). Learning phonemes: How far can the input take us? In H.-J. Do, L. Dominguez, & A. Johansen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 480-490).Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
46. Maye, J., & Weiss, D. J. (2003). Statistical cues facilitate infants' discrimination of difficult phonetic contrasts. In B. Beachley, A. Brown, & F. Conlin (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 508-518).Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
47. Maye, J., Werker, J. F., & Gerken, L. A. (2002). Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination. Cognition, 82, B101-B111.
48. Mintz, T. (2002). Category induction from distributional cues in an artificial language. Memory and Cognition, 30, 678-686.
49. Naigles, L. R. (2002). Form is easy, meaning is hard: Resolving a paradox in early child language. Cognition, 86, 157-199.
50. Pinker, S. (1984). Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
51. Polka, L., & Werker, J. F. (1994). Developmental changes in perception of nonnative vowel contrasts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 421-435.
52. Pullum, G. K., & Scholz, B. C. (2002). Empirical assessment of stimulus poverty arguments. Linguistic Review, 19, 9-50.
53. Saffran, J. R., & Thiessen, E. D. (2003). Pattern induction by infant language learners. Developmental Psychology, 39, 484-494.
54. Santelmann, L. M., & Jusczyk, P. W. (1998). Sensitivity to discontinuous dependencies in language learners: Evidence for limitations in processing space. Cognition, 69, 105-134.
55. Sebastián Gallés, N., & Bosch, L. (2002). The building of phonotactic knowledge in bilinguals: The role of early exposure. Perception and Psychophysics, 28, 974-989.
56. Seidl, A., & Buckley, E. (2005). On the learning of arbitrary phonological rules. Language Learning and Development, 3-4, 289-316.
57. Shady, M. E. (1996). Infants' sensitivity to function morphemes. Unpublished PhD dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY.
58. Shady, M. E., Gerken, L. A., & Jusczyk, P. W. (1995). Some evidence of sensitivity to prosody and word order in ten-month-olds. In D. MacLaughlin & S. McEwan (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Boston University Conference on Language Development: Vol. 2. Somerville, MA: Cas-cadilla Press.
59. Shafer, V. L., Shucard, D. W., Shucard, J. L., & Gerken, L. A. (1998). An electrophysiological study of infants' sensitivity to the sound patterns of English speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 874-886.
60. Stager, C. L., & Werker, J. F. (1997). Infants listen for more phonetic detail in speech perception than in word-learning tasks. Nature, 388, 381-382.
61. Thiessen, E. D., & Saffran, J. R. (2003). When cues collide: Use of stress and statistical cues to word boundaries by 7-to 9-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 39, 706-716.
62. Turk, A., Jusczyk, P. W., & Gerken, L. A. (1995). Infants' sensitivity to syllable weight as a determinant of English stress. Language and Speech, 38, 143-158.
63. Werker, J. F., Fennell, C., Corcoran, K., & Stager, C. L. (2002). Infants' ability to learn phonetically similar words: Effects of age and vocabulary size. Infancy, 3, 1-30.
64. Werker, J. F., & Pegg, J. E. (1992). Infant speech perception and phonological acquisition. In C.A. Ferguson, L. Menn, & C. Stoel-Gammon (Eds.), Phonological development: Models, research, implications (pp. 285-311).Timonium, MD: York Press.
65. Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1984). Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior and Development, 7, 49-63.
66. Wilson, R. (2000). Category learning in second language acquisition: What artificial grammars can tell us. Unpublished Masters thesis, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.