Assessing Student Problem-Solving Skills

Structural Equation Modeling

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 609-621

  Kyriakides, Leonidas ^a   Gagatsis, Athanasios ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CYPRUS   (Cyprus)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67749142468     PISSN: 10705511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15328007SEM1004_7     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. American Educational Research Association (AERA), American Psychological Association (APA), & National Council of Measurement in Education (NCME). (1985). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: Author.
2. Allen, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction to measurement theory. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
3. Assessment Systems Corporation. (1996). User's manual for the ITEMAN Conventional Item Analysis Program. St. Paul, MN: Author.
4. Banerji, M. (1999). Validation of scores/measures from a K-2 developmental assessment in mathematics. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59, 694-715.
5. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
6. Bentler, P.M. (1995). EQS: Structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software Inc.
7. Brown, A.L., Campione, J. C., Webber, L. S., & McGilly, K. (1992). Interactive learning environments: A new look at assessment and instruction. In B. R. Gifford & M. C. O'Connor (Eds.), Changing assessments: Alternative views of aptitude, achievement and instruction (pp. 121-211). Boston: Kluwer.
8. Burton, L. (1984). Thinking things through. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
9. Byrne, B. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
10. Calfee, R. (1995). Implications of cognitive psychology for authentic assessment and instruction. In T. Oakland & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), International perspectives on academic assessment (pp. 25-48). Boston: Kluwer Academic.
11. Charles, R., Lester, F. K., & O'Daffer, P. (1987). How to evaluate progress in problem solving.Virginia: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM).
12. Chi, M., Hutchinson, J., & Robin, A. (1989). How inferences about novel domain-related concepts can be constrained by structured knowledge. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 35, 27-62.
13. Cronbach, L. J. (1990). Essentials of psychological testing (3rd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
14. Department for Education and Employment (DfEE). (1999). The national curriculum for England. London: Author.
15. English, L. D. (1999). Profiles of development in 12-year-olds' participation in a thought-revealing problem program. In O. Zaslavski (Ed.), Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 297-304). Haifa: Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Department of Education in Technology and Science.
16. Geary, D. (1994). Children's mathematical development: Research and practical applications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
17. Ginsburg, H. P. (1989). Children's arithmetic: How they learn it and how you teach it (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
18. Greer, R. (1987). Nonconservation of multiplication and division involving decimals. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 18, 37-45.
19. Hambleton, R. K. (1995). Meeting the measurement challenges of the 1990s and beyond: New assessment models and methods. In T. Oakland & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), International perspectives on academic assessment (pp. 83-104). Boston: Kluwer Academic.
20. Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.
21. Kyriakides, L. (1997). English and Cypriot primary teachers' perceptions of policy for curriculum reform in mathematics. Educational Research and Evaluation, 3, 214-242.
22. Kyriakides, L. (1999). Baseline assessment and school improvement: Research on attainment and progress in mathematics. In O. Zaslavski (Ed.), Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 185-192). Haifa: Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Department of Education in Technology and Science.
23. Kyriakides, L. (2000). Towards a new developmental model of assessment of problem solving skills. In A. Gagatsis, C. Constantinou, & L. Kyriakides (Eds.), Learning and assessment in mathematics and science (pp. 317-331). Nicosia: University of Cyprus.
24. Lester, F. K., & Kroll, D. (1990). Assessing student growth in mathematical problem solving. In G. Kulm (Ed.), Assessing higher order thinking in mathematics (pp. 53-70). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
25. Maruyama, G. M. (1998). Basics of structural equation modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13-103). New York: Macmillan.
27. Ministry of Education. (1994). The new curriculum. Nicosia, Cyprus: Author.
28. National Assessment Governing Board. (1994). Mathematics framework for the 1996 and 2000 national assessment of educational progress. Washington, DC: Author
29. National Association for the Education of Young Children. (1988). Position statement on standardized testing of young children 3 through 8 years of age. Young Children, 43(3), 42-47.
30. National Commission on Testing and Public Policy. (1990). From gatekeeper to gateway: Transforming testing in America. Chestnut Hill, MA: Author.
31. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
32. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
33. Romberg, T. A., Zarinnia, E. A., & Collis. K. F. (1990). A new world view of assessment. In G. Kulm (Ed.), Assessing higher order thinking in mathematics (pp. 21-38). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
34. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, FL: Academic.
35. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation. (UNESCO). (1997). Appraisal study on the Cyprus education system. Paris: International Institute in Educational Planning (IIEP).