'I want hold Postman Pat': An investigation into the acquisition of infinitival marker 'to'

First Language

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 313-339

  Kirjavainen, Minna ^a   Theakston, Anna ^a   Lieven, Elena ^b   Tomasello, Michael ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR EVOLUTIONARY ANTHROPOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Frequency; Infinitival to; Omission errors; To infinitive clauses; Two word chunks

Indexed keywords

EID: 67749091207     PISSN: 01427237     EISSN: 17402344     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0142723709105312     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Abbot-Smith, K., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Exemplar-learning and schematization in a usage-based account of syntactic acquisition. Linguistic Review, 23, 275-290.
2. Bannard, C., & Matthews, D. (2008). Stored word sequences in language learning: The effect of familiarity on children's repetition of four-word combinations. Psychological Science, 19, 241-248.
3. Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1987). Competition, variation, and language learning. In E. MacWhinney (Ed.), Mechanisms of language acquisition (pp. 157-193). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4. Bloom, L., Tackeff, J., & Lahey, M. (1984). Learning to in complement constructions. Journal of Child Language, 11, 391-406.
5. Brown, R. (1973). A first language: The early stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6. Bybee, J. (1998). The emergent lexicon. Papers from the regional meetings. Chicago Linguistics Society, 2, 421-435.
7. Cameron-Faulkner, T., Lieven, E., & Theakston, A. (2007). What part of no do children not understand? A usage-based account of multiword negation. Journal of Child Language, 34, 251-282.
8. Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.
9. Chomsky, N. (2000). New horizons in the study of language and mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10. Clahsen, H., & Felser, C. (2006). Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 3-42.
11. Diessel, H. (2004). The acquisition of complex sentences. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12. Diessel, H., & Tomasello, M. (2001). The acquisition of finite complement clauses in English: A corpus-based analysis. Cognitive Linguistics, 12, 97-141.
13. Gentner, D., & Medina, J. (1998). Similarity and the development of rules. Cognition, 65, 263-297.
14. Huttenlocher, J., Vasilyeva, M., Cymerman, E., & Levine, S. (2001). Language input and child syntax. Cognitive Psychology, 45, 337-374.
15. Hyams, N. (1986). Language acquisition and the theory of parameters. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
16. Kallestinova, E. (2007). Three stages of foot infinitive production in early child Russian. First Language, 27, 99-131.
17. Kidd, E., Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2006). Examining the role of lexical frequency in the acquisition and processing of sentential complements. Cognitive Development, 21, 93-107.
18. Kirjavainen, M., Theakston, A., & Lieven, E. (in press). Can input explain children's me-for-I errors? Journal of Child Language.
19. Kuczaj, S. (1976). -ing, -s and -ed: A study of the acquisition of certain verb inflections. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.
20. Lieven E., Behrens, H., Spears, J., & Tomasello, M. (2003). Early syntactic creativity: A usage-based approach. Journal of Child Language, 30, 333-370.
21. Lieven, E.V., Pine, J.M., & Dresner-Barnes, H.D. (1992). Individual differences in early vocabulary development: Redefining the referential- expressive distinction. Journal of Child Language, 19, 287-310.
22. Limber, J. (1973). The genesis of complex sentences. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and acquisition of language (pp. 169-185). London: Academic Press.
23. MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. MacWhinney, B., Leinbach, J., Taraban, R., & McDonald, J. (1989). Language learning: Cues or rules ? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 255-277.
25. Peters, A.M. (2001). Filler syllables: What is their status in emerging grammar? Journal of Child Language, 28, 229-242.
26. Pine, J.M., & Lieven, E.V.M. (1997). Slot-and-frame patterns and the development of the determiner category. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18, 123-138.
27. Pinker, S. (1984). Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28. Pinker, S. (1991). Rules of language. Science, 253, 530-535.
29. Radford, A. (1990). Syntactic theory and the acquisition of English syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.
30. Radford, A., Atkinson, M., Britain, D., Clahsen, H., & Spencer, A. (1999). Linguistics: An introduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31. Reali, F., & Christiansen, M. (2005). Uncovering the richness of the stimulus: Structure dependence and indirect statistical evidence. Cognitive Science, 29, 1007-1028.
32. Rice, S. (1999). Patterns of acquisition in the emerging mental lexicon: The case of to and for in English. Brain and Language, 68, 268-276.
33. Rice, S. (2003). Growth of a lexical network: Nine English prepositions in acquisition. In H. Cuyckens, R. Dirven, & J. R. Taylor (Eds.), Cognitive approaches to lexical semantics (pp. 243-280). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
34. Rowland, C. (2007). Explaining errors in children's questions. Cognition, 104, 106-134.
35. Rowland, C.F., & Pine, J.M. (2000). Subject-auxiliary inversion errors and wh- question acquisition: 'What children do know?'. Journal of Child Language, 27, 157-181.
36. Sachs, J. (1983). Talking about the there and then: The emergence of displaced preference in parent-child discourse. In K. E. Nelson (Ed.), Children's language (Vol. 4, pp. 1-28). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37. Theakston, A., & Lieven, E.V.M. (2008). The influence of discourse context on children's provision of auxiliary BE. Journal of Child Language, 35, 129-158.
38. Theakston, A.L., Lieven, E.V.M., Pine, J.M., & Rowland, C.F. (2001). The role of performance limitations in the acquisition of verb-argument structure: An alternative account. Journal of Child Language, 28, 127-152.
39. Theakston, A.L., Lieven, E.V.M., Pine, J.M., & Rowland, C.F. (2002). Going, going, gone: The acquisition of the verb 'go'. Journal of Child Language, 29, 783-811.
40. Theakston, A.L., Lieven, E.V.M., & Tomasello, M. (2003). The role of the input in the acquisition of the third person singular verbs in English. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 863-883.
41. Tomasello, M. (1987). Learning to use prepositions: A case study. Journal of Child Language, 14, 79-98.
42. Valian, V., & Aubry, S. (2005). When opportunity knocks twice: Two-year-olds' repetition of sentence subjects. Journal of Child Language, 32, 617-641.
43. Valian, V., Hoeffner, J., & Aubry, S. (1996). Young children's imitation of sentence subjects: Evidence of processing limitations. Developmental Psychology, 32, 153-164.
44. Wexler, K. (1994). Optional infinitives, head movement and the economy of derivations. In D. Lightfoot & N. Horstein (Eds.), Verb movement (pp. 305-350). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
45. Wexler, K. (1998). Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint: A new explanation of the optional infinitive stage. Lingua, 106, 23-79.
46. Wijnen, F. (1998). The temporal interpretation of Dutch children's root infinitivals: The effect of eventivity. First Language, 18, 379-402.
47. Wilson, S. (2003). Lexically specific constructions in the acquisition of inflection in English. Journal of Child Language, 30, 75-115.