Efficacy of the revised Vienna Classification for diagnosing colorectal epithelial neoplasias

World Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 15, Issue 19, 2009, Pages 2351-2356

  Tominaga, Kenji ^a   Fujinuma, Sumio ^a   Endo, Takuro ^a   Saida, Yoshihisa ^a   Takahashi, Kei ^a   Maetani, Iruru ^a  

^a TOHO UNIVERSITY OHASHI MEDICAL CENTER   (Japan)

Author keywords

Biopsy; Cancer; Colonoscopy; Colorectal epithelial neoplasia; Revised Vienna Classification

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER GRADING; CANCER INVASION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLON POLYP; COLORECTAL CARCINOMA; COLORECTAL EPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; COLORECTAL TUMOR; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTESTINE BIOPSY; INTESTINE MUCOSA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; RECTUM POLYP; REFERENCE VALUE; REVISED VIENNA CLASSIFICATION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TUMOR CLASSIFICATION; TUMOR DIAGNOSIS; TUMOR DIFFERENTIATION; TUMOR VOLUME;

EID: 67651250585     PISSN: 10079327     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.15.2351     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Schlemper RJ, Itabashi M, Kato Y, Lewin KJ, Riddell RH, Shimoda T, Sipponen P, Stolte M, Watanabe H. Differences in the diagnostic criteria used by Japanese and Western pathologists to diagnose colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 1998; 82: 60-69
2. Schlemper RJ, Kato Y, Stolte M. Diagnostic criteria for gastrointestinal carcinomas in Japan and Western countries: proposal for a new classification system of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2000; 15 Suppl: G49-G57
3. Dixon MF. Gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia: Vienna revisited. Gut 2002; 51: 130-131
4. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. Response assessment of nonsurgical treatment for colorectal carcinoma. Japanese classification of colorectal carcinoma. 1st English ed. Tokyo: Kanehara & Co Ltd, 1997: 77-82
5. Muto T, Bussey HJ, Morson BC. The evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum. Cancer 1975; 36: 2251-2270
6. Williams CB, Talbot IC. Polyps and tumors of the colon. In: Sivak MV Jr, ed. Gastroenterologic Endoscopy. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 2000: 1351-1378
7. Jass JR. Discrepancies between East and West. Cancer 2000; 88: 969-970
8. Willis J, Riddell RH. Biology versus terminology: East meets West in surgical pathology. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 57: 369-376
9. Schlemper RJ, Riddell RH, Kato Y, Borchard F, Cooper HS, Dawsey SM, Dixon MF, Fenoglio-Preiser CM, Fléjou JF, Geboes K, Hattori T, Hirota T, Itabashi M, Iwafuchi M, Iwashita A, Kim YI, Kirchner T, Klimpfinger M, Koike M, Lauwers GY, Lewin KJ, Oberhuber G, Offner F, Price AB, Rubio CA, Shimizu M, Shimoda T, Sipponen P, Solcia E, Stolte M, Watanabe H, Yamabe H. The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia. Gut 2000; 47: 251-255
10. Hamilton SR, Aaltonen LA. World Health Organization classification of tumours: Pathology and genetics of tumours of the digestive system. Lyon: IARC Press, 2000
11. Straus SE, Richardson WS, Glasziou P, Haynes RB. Evidence-based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM. 3rd ed. Edinburgh, New York: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone, 2005
12. Livstone EM, Troncale FJ, Sheahan DG. Value of a single forceps biopsy of colonic polyps. Gastroenterology 1977; 73: 1296-1298
13. Pugliese V, Gatteschi B, Aste H, Nicolò G, Munizzi F, Giacchero A, Bruzzi P. Value of multiple forceps biopsies in assessing the malignant potential of colonic polyps. Tumori 1981; 67: 57-62
14. Gondal G, Grotmol T, Hofstad B, Bretthauer M, Eide TJ, Hoff G. Biopsy of colorectal polyps is not adequate for grading of neoplasia. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 1193-1197
15. Tominaga K, Nakanishi Y, Nimura S, Yoshimura K, Sakai Y, Shimoda T. Predictive histopathologic factors for lymph node metastasis in patients with nonpedunculated submucosal invasive colorectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48: 92-100