Biopsy of colorectal polyps is not adequate for grading of neoplasia

Endoscopy

Volumn 37, Issue 12, 2005, Pages 1193-1197

  Gondal, G ^a   Grotmol, Tom ^a   Hofstad, B ^b   Bretthauer, M ^a   Eide, T J ^c   Hoff, G ^a  

^a CANCER REGISTRY OF NORWAY   (Norway)

^b ULLEVÅL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^c OSLO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ADVANCED CANCER; ARTICLE; CANCER GRADING; CANCER PREVENTION; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER SIZE; CLINICAL FEATURE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLON BIOPSY; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL ADENOMA; COLORECTAL CARCINOMA; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NORWAY; POLYPECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECTUM BIOPSY; SIGMOIDOSCOPY; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ADENOMA; ADULT; AGED; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; COHORT STUDIES; COLECTOMY; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; ENDOSCOPY; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEOPLASM STAGING; REGISTRIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGMOIDOSCOPY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 28844453696     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-921031     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Pugliese V, Gatteschi B, Aste H et al. Value of multiple forceps biopsies in assessing the malignant potential of colonic polyps. Tumori 1981; 67: 57-62
2. Thiis-Evensen E, Hoff GS, Sauar J et al. Population-based surveillance by colonoscopy: effect on the incidence of colorectal cancer. Scand J Gastroenterol 1999; 34: 414-20
3. Bretthauer M, Gondal G, Larsen IK et al. Design, organization and management of a controlled population screening study for detection of colorectal neoplasia. Scand J Gastroenterol 2002; 37: 568-573
4. Gondal G, Grotmol T, Hofstad B et al. The Norwegian colorectal cancer prevention (NORCCAP) screening study. Baseline finding and implementations for clinical work-up in age groups 50-64 years. Scand J Gastroenterol 2003; 38: 635-642
5. Jass J. Sobin LH. Histologic typing of intestinal tumours. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1989
6. Rex DK, Culter CS, Lemmel GT, Rahmani EY, Clark DW, Helper DJ, Lehman GA, Mark DG. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 1997; 112: 24-28
7. Hixson LJ, Fennerty MB, Sampliner RE, Garewal HS. Prospective blinded trail of the colonoscopic miss-rate of large colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 1991; 37: 125-127
8. Rex DK, Alikhan M, Cummings O et al. Accuracy of pathologic interpretation of colorectal polyps by general pathologists in community practice. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 50: 468-474
9. Costantini M, Sciallero S, Giannini A et al. Interobserver agreement in the histologic diagnosis of colorectal polyps. The experience of the multicenter adenoma colorectal study (SMAC). J Clin Epidemiol 2003; 56: 209-214
10. Brown LJR, Smeeton NC, Dixon MF. Assessment of dysplasia in colorectal adenomas: an observer variation and morphometric study. J Clin Pathol 1985; 38: 174-179
11. Jensen P, Krogsgaard MR, Christiansen J et al. Observer variability in the assessment of type and dysplasia of colorectal adenomas, analyzed using kappa statistics. Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38: 195-198
12. Fung CHK, Goldman H. The incidence and significance of villous change in adenomatous polyps. Am J Clin Pathol 1970; 53: 21-25
13. Lane N, Fenoglio CM. Observation on the adenoma as precursor to ordinary large bowel carcinoma. Gastrointest Radiol 1976; 1: 111-119
14. Silverberg SG. Focally malignant adenomatous polyps of the colon and rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1970; 131: 103-114