Dynamic positioning of scoliotic patients during spine instrumentation surgery

Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 190-196

  Duke, Kajsa ^a,b   Aubin, Carl Eric ^a,b   Dansereau, Jean ^a,b   Koller, Annick ^a,b   Labelle, Hubert ^b  

^a ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MONTREAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Positioning frame; Scoliosis; Surgery; Trunk geometry

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BODY POSTURE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DEVICE; DYNAMIC POSITIONING FRAME; FEMALE; FORCE; GEOMETRY; HOSPITAL EQUIPMENT; HUMAN; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MALE; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; PATIENT POSITIONING; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCOLIOSIS; SENSOR; SPINE SURGERY; STANDING; THORACOLUMBAR SPINE; TRUNK; BED; CHILD; EVALUATION; INSTRUMENTATION; INTERNAL FIXATOR; KYPHOSIS; METHODOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT MONITORING; PEROPERATIVE CARE; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PRESSURE; SPINE FUSION; STANDARD;

ADOLESCENT; BEDDING AND LINENS; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNAL FIXATORS; INTRAOPERATIVE CARE; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; KYPHOSIS; MALE; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; POSTURE; PRESSURE; SCOLIOSIS; SPINAL FUSION;

EID: 67651152921     PISSN: 15360652     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181753afd     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Delorme S, Labelle H, Poitras B, et al. Pre-, intra-, and postoperative three-dimensional evaluation of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Spinal Disord. 2000;13:93-101.
2. Schonauer C, Bocchetti A, Barbagallo G, et al. Positioning on surgical table. Eur Spine J. 2004;13:S50-S55.
3. Relton JE, Hall JE. An operation frame for spinal fusion. A new apparatus designed to reduce haemorrhage during operation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1967;49:327-332.
4. Marsicano JG, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. The lordotic effect of the OSI frame on operative adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients. Spine. 1998;23:1341-1348.
5. Peterson MD, Nelson LM, McManus AC, et al. The effect of operative position on lumbar lordosis. A radiographic study of patients under anesthesia in the prone and 90-90 positions. Spine. 1995;20:1419-1424.
6. Stephens GC, Yoo JU, Wilbur G. Comparison of lumbar sagittal alignment produced by different operative positions. Spine. 1996;21:1802-1806; discussion 1807. (Pubitemid 26260298)
7. Tan SB, Kozak JA, Dickson JH, et al. Effect of operative position on sagittal alignment of the lumbar spine. Spine. 1994;19: 314-318.
8. Tribus CB, Belanger TA, Zdeblick TA. The effect of operative position and short-segment fusion on maintenance of sagittal alignment of the lumbar spine. Spine. 1999;24:58-61.
9. Behairy Y, Hauser D, Hill D, et al. Partial correction of Cobb angle prior to posterior spinal instrumentation. Ann Saudi Med. 2000;20:398-401. (Pubitemid 32851341)
10. Labelle H, Dansereau J, Bellefleur C, et al. Peroperative three-dimensional correction of idiopathic scoliosis with the Cotrel- Dubousset procedure. Spine. 1995;20:1406-1409.
11. Duke K, Dansereau J, Labelle H, et al. Study of patient positioning on a dynamic frame for scoliosis surgery. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2002;91:144-148.
12. Mac-Thiong JM, Labelle H, Vandal S, et al. Intra-operative tracking of the trunk during surgical correction of scoliosis: a feasibility study. Comput Aided Surg. 2000;5:333-342. (Pubitemid 32049054)
13. Labelle H, Aubin, C-E, Dansereau J, et al. Dynamic frame for prone surgical positioning. 2005: US patent 6,941,951.
14. Mac-Thiong JM, Labelle H, Petit Y, et al. The effect of the Relton- Hall operative frame on trunk deformity in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2002;11:556-560. (Pubitemid 35439174)
15. Klepps SJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. Prospective comparison of flexibility radiographs in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2001;26:E74-E79.
16. Majdouline Y, Aubin CE, Robitaille M, et al. Scoliosis correction objectives in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2007; 27:775-781. (Pubitemid 47428998)
17. Raso VJ, Lou E, Hill DL, et al. Trunk distortion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 1998;18:222-226. (Pubitemid 28119513)
18. Suzuki N, Inami K, Ono T, et al. Analysis of Posterior Trunk Symmetry Index (POTSI) in Scoliosis. Part 1. Stokes, I. A. F. Research into Spinal Deformities 1999;2:81-84. IOS Press.
19. de Jonge T, Dubousset JF, Illes T. Sagittal plane correction in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2002;27:754-760. (Pubitemid 34259943)
20. Cheh G, Lenke LG, Lehman RA Jr, et al. The reliability of preoperative supine radiographs to predict the amount of curve flexibility in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2007;32:2668-2672. (Pubitemid 350135377)
21. Jaremko JL, Poncet P, Ronsky J, et al. Indices of torso asymmetry related to spinal deformity in scoliosis. Clin Biomech. 2002;17:559-568. (Pubitemid 35292061)
22. Mac-Thiong JM, Labelle H, Poitras B, et al. The effect of intraoperative traction during posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2004;29: 1549-1554. (Pubitemid 38943839)
23. Duke K, Aubin CE, Dansereau J, et al. Biomechanical simulations of scoliotic spine correction due to prone position and anaesthesia prior to surgical instrumentation. Clin Biomech. 2005; 20:923-931. (Pubitemid 41379372)
24. Duke K, Aubin CE, Dansereau J, et al. Computer simulation for the optimization of patient positioning in spinal deformity instrumentation surgery. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2008;46:33-41.