Biomechanical analysis of a disc prosthesis distal to a scoliosis model

Spine

Volumn 34, Issue 14, 2009, Pages 1470-1475

  Quirno, Martin ^a   Kamerlink, Jonathan R ^a   Valdevit, Antonio ^a   Kang, Matthew ^a   Yaszay, Burt ^b   Duncan, Naphysah ^a   Boachie Adjei, Oheneba ^c   Lonner, Baron S ^a   Errico, Thomas J ^a,d  

^a NYU HOSPITAL FOR JOINT DISEASES   (United States)

^b RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY   (United States)

^d NEW YORK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Adjacent segment disease; Biomechanics; FlexiCore; Scoliosis model; Total disc arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BONE PROSTHESIS; BONE SCREW; CONTROLLED STUDY; COW; DISEASE MODEL; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCOLIOSIS; SPINE FUSION; SPINE MOBILITY; THORACOLUMBAR SPINE;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; CATTLE; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; SCOLIOSIS; SPINAL FUSION; THORACIC VERTEBRAE;

EID: 67651152777     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a8e418     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Kahanovitz N, Arnoczky SP, Levine DB, et al. The effects of internal fixation on the articular cartilage of unfused canine facet joint cartilage. Spine 1984;9:268-272 (Pubitemid 14109080)
2. Nagata H, Schendel MJ, Transfeldt EE, et al. The effects of immobilization of long segments of the spine on the adjacent and distal facet force and lumbosacral motion. Spine 1993;18:2471-2479 (Pubitemid 24001357)
3. Bushell GR, Ghosh P, Taylor TF, et al. The effect of spinal fusion on the collagen and proteoglycans of the canine intervertebral disc. J Surg Res 1978;25:61-69 (Pubitemid 8403944)
4. Lee CK, Langrana NA. Lumbosacral spinal fusion: a biomechanical study. Spine 1984;9:574-581
5. Shono Y, Kaneda K, Abumi K, et al. Stability of posterior spinal instrumentation and its effect on adjacent motion segments in the lumbosacral spine. Spine 1998;23:1550-1558 (Pubitemid 28459959)
6. Kuhns CA, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Thoracolumbar deformity arthrodesis stopping at L5: fate of the L5-S1 disc, minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine 2007;32:2771-2776
7. Gillet P. The fate of the adjacent motion segments after lumbar fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003;16:338-345 (Pubitemid 36959446)
8. Park P, Garton HJ, Gala VC, et al. Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. Spine 2004;29:1938-1944 (Pubitemid 39181056)
9. Ghiselli G, Wang JC, Bhatia NN, et al. Adjacent segment. Degeneration in the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86:1497-1503 (Pubitemid 38886539)
10. Cheh G, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Adjacent segment disease following lumbar/thoracolumbar fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation: a minimum 5-year follow-up. Spine 2007;32:2253-2257 (Pubitemid 47415109)
11. Violas P, Estivalezes E, Briot J, et al. Quantification of intervertebral disc volume properties below spine fusion, using magnetic resonance imaging, in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery. Spine 2007;32:E405-12. (Pubitemid 47051859)
12. Schlegel JD, Smith JA, Schleusener RL. Lumbar motion segment pathology adjacent to thoracolumbar, lumbar, and lumbosacral fusions. Spine 1996;21:970-981
13. Miyakoshi N, Abe E, Shimada Y, et al. Outcome of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis and postoperative intervertebral disc degeneration adjacent to the fusion. Spine 2000;25:1837-1842 (Pubitemid 30469663)
14. Lenke LG, Eisermann L, Bilancini ME, et al. Biomechanics of disc arthroplasty placed below a simulated long spinal fusion construct: is it stable and feasible? Paper presented at: 68th International Meeting on Advanced Spine Techniques (IMAST) 11th Annual Meeting; July 1-3, 2004; South Hampton, Bermuda.
15. Lehman RA Jr, Lenke LG. Long-segment fusion of the thoracolumbar spine in conjunction with a motion-preserving artificial disc replacement: case report and review of the literature. Spine 2007;32:E240-5.
16. Bertagnoli R, Yue JJ, Shah RV, et al. The treatment of disabling multilevel lumbar discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up. Spine 2005;30:2192-2199 (Pubitemid 41429200)
17. Hannibal M, Thomas DJ, Low J, et al. ProDisc-L total disc replacement: a comparison of 1-level versus 2-level arthroplasty patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Spine 2007;32:2322-2326 (Pubitemid 47508839)
18. Huang RC, Tropiano P, Marnay T, et al. Range of motion and adjacent level degeneration after lumbar total disc replacement. Spine J 2006;6:242-247
19. Grauer JN, Biyani A, Faizan A, et al. Biomechanics of two-level Charite artificial disc placement in comparison to fusion plus single-level disc placement combination. Spine J 2006;6:659-666 (Pubitemid 44752632)
20. McAfee PC, Cunningham B, Hayes V, et al. Biomechanical analysis of rotational motions after disc arthroplasty: implications for patients with adult deformities. Spine 2006;31(suppl):S152- 60. (Pubitemid 44339460)
21. Kostuik JP, Valdevit A, Chang HG, et al. Mechanical loading of the lumbar spine. Spine 1998;23:1721-1728
22. Aaro S, Ohlen G. The effect of Harrington instrumentation on sagittal con- figuration and mobility of the spine in scoliosis. Spine 1983;8:570-575 (Pubitemid 14244158)
23. Cochran T, Irstam L, Nachemson A. Long-term anatomic and functional changes in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated by Harrington rod fusion. Spine 1983;8:576-584 (Pubitemid 14244159)
24. Casey MP, Asher MA, Jacobs RR, et al. The effect of Harrington rod contouring on lumbar lordosis. Spine 19887;12:750-753
25. van Dam BE, Bradford DS, Lonstein JE, et al. Adult idiopathic scoliosis treated by posterior spinal fusion and Harrington instrumentation, Spine 1987;12:32-36
26. Swank SM, Mauri TM, Brown JC. The lumbar lordosis below Harrington instrumentation for scoliosis. Spine 1990;15:181-186
27. Swank S, Lonstein JE, Moe JH, et al. Surgical treatment of adult scoliosis. A review of two hundred and twenty-two cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1981;63:268-287 (Pubitemid 11154540)
28. Lagrone MO, Bradford DS, Moe JH, et al. Treatment of symptomatic flatback after spinal fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988;70:569-580
29. Farcy J. Management of flatback and related kyphotic decompensation syndromes. Spine 1997;22:2452-2457 (Pubitemid 28069117)
30. Booth KC, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, et al. Complications and predictive factors for the successful treatment of flatback deformity (fixed sagittal imbalance). Spine 1999;24:1712-1720
31. Slosar PJ, Reynolds JB, Schofferman J, et al. Patient satisfaction after circumferential lumbar fusion. Spine 2000;25:722-726 (Pubitemid 30169779)
32. Fritzell P, Hägg O, Wessberg P, et al; Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Chronic low back pain and fusion: a comparison of three surgical techniques: a prospective multicenter randomized study from the Swedish lumbar spine study group. Spine 2002;27:1131-1141 (Pubitemid 34596329)
33. Zigler J. Delamarter R. Spivak JM, et al. Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease. Spine 2007;32:1155-1162 (Pubitemid 46743014)
34. Balderston RA, Winter RB, Moe JH, et al. Fusion to the sacrum for nonparalytic scoliosis in the adult. Spine 1986;11:824-829
35. Grubb SA, Lipscomb HJ, Suh PB. Results of surgical treatment of painful adult scoliosis: results of surgical treatment of painful adult scoliosis. Spine 1994;19:1619-1627
36. Kostuik JP, Musha Y. Extension to the sacrum of previous adolescent scoliosis fusions in adult life. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999:53-60. (Pubitemid 29333985)
37. Islam NC, Wood KB, Transfeldt EE, et al. Extension of fusions to the pelvis in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2001;26:166-173
38. Edwards CC II, Bridwell KH, Patel A, et al. Long adult deformity fusions to L5 and the sacrum: a matched cohort analysis. Spine 2004;29:1996-2005. (Pubitemid 40202270)
39. McAfee PC, Cunningham B, Holsapple G, et al. A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part II: evaluation of radiographic outcomes and correlation of surgical technique accuracy with clinical outcomes. Spine 2005;30:1576-83; discussion E388-90. (Pubitemid 41022418)
40. Levin DA, Bendo JA, Quirno M, et al. Comparative charge analysis of one- and two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion. Spine 2007;32:2905-2909 (Pubitemid 351339364)
41. Auerbach JD. Wills BP. McIntosh TC, et al. Evaluation of spinal kinematics following lumbar total disc replacement and circumferential fusion using in vivo fluoroscopy. Spine 2007;32:527-536
42. Guyer RD, Tromanhauser SG, Regan JJ. An economic model of one-level lumbar arthroplasty versus fusion. Spine J 2007;7:558-562