Adoption of information technology in primary care physician offices in New Zealand and Denmark, part 5: Final comparisons

Informatics in Primary Care

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 17-22

  Protti, Denis ^a   Bowden, Tom ^b   Johansen, Ib ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

^b HealthLink   (New Zealand)

^c Danish Health Data Network   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Critical success factors; Electronic medical records systems; Evaluation and comparison; Medical and health informatics

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DATA BASE; DENMARK; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; MASS COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL RECORD; NEW ZEALAND; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

DATABASES AS TOPIC; DENMARK; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; NEW ZEALAND; PHYSICIANS' OFFICES; PHYSICIANS, FAMILY;

EID: 67651148153     PISSN: 14760320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14236/jhi.v17i1.710     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Dobrev A, Haesner M, Hüsing T, Korte WB and Meyer I. Benchmarking ICT Use Among General Practitioners in Europe. Bonn: Empirica for the European Commission. ec.europa.eu/informationsociety/eeurope/i2010/docs/bechmarking/gp- survey-final-report.pdf
2. Schoen C, Osborn R, Huynh PT, Doty M and Peugh J. On the front lines of care: primary care doctors' office systems, experiences, and views in seven countries. Health Affairs 2006;25:w555-71.
3. Baxley E and Campbell T. Electronic health records in academic family medicine practices: a tale of progress and opportunity. Annals of Family Medicine 2008;6:88- 9.
4. Langley J and Beasley C. Health Information Technology for Improving Quality of Care in Primary Care Settings. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2007.
5. Protti DJ. A comparison of information technology in general practice in ten countries. Healthcare Quarterly 2007;10:107-16.
6. Protti DJ, Wright G, Treweek S and Johansen I. Primary care computing in England and Scotland: a comparison with Denmark. Informatics in Primary Care2006;14:93-9. (Pubitemid 44687600)
7. Protti DJ. Lessons to be learned from England about the potential of GP computer systems to improve patient safety. Healthcare Quarterly 2004;7:76-80.
8. Yusof MM, Kuljis J, Papazafeiropoulou A and Stergioulas L. An evaluation framework for Health Information Systems: human, organization and technology-fit factors (HOT-fit). International Journal of Medical Informatics 2008;77:377-85.
9. Ammenwerth E, Graber S, Herrmann G, Biirkle T and Konig J. Evaluation of health information systems - problems and challenges. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2003;71:125-35. (Pubitemid 37168048)
10. Croll PR and Croll J. Investigating risk exposure in e- health systems. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2007;76:460-5. (Pubitemid 46498974)
11. Westbrook JI, Braithwaite J, Georgious A et al. Multi- method evaluation of information and communication technologies in health in the context ofwicked problems and socio-technical theory. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2007;14:746-55. (Pubitemid 350026422)
12. Sumita Y, Takata M, Ishitsuka K, Tominaga Y and Ohe K. Building a reference functional model for EHR systems. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2007;76:688-700. (Pubitemid 47079006)
13. Bossen C. Evaluation of a computerized problem- oriented medical record in a hospital department: does it support daily clinical practice? International Journal of Medical Informatics 2007;76:592-600. (Pubitemid 46874259)
14. Jaana M, Ward M, Paré G and Wakefield D. Clinical information technology in hospitals: a comparison between the state of Iowa and two provinces in Canada. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2005;74: 719-31. (Pubitemid 41207420)
15. Protti DJ. Moving toward a single comprehensive electronic health record for every citizen in Andalucía, Spain. Healthcare Quarterly 2007;10:114-23.
16. Egnell P-O. Northern Sweden's framework for innovation in ehealth. British Journal of Healthcare Computing and Information Management 2005;22:16-18.
17. Perlin JB, Kolodner RM and Roswell RH. The Veterans Health Administration: quality, value, accountability, and information as transforming strategies for patient- centered care. American Journal of Managed Care 2004; 10:828-36.
18. Healthcare IT and the Davies Awards of Excellence. Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society. 2006.
19. Protti DJ, Edworthy S and Johansen I. Adoption of information technology in primary care physician offices in Alberta and Denmark: part 1 - historical, technical and cultural forces. Electronic Healthcare 2007;6: 95-102.
20. DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, Rao SR et al. Electronic health records in ambulatory care: a national survey of physicians. New England Journal of Medicine 2008;359: 50-60.
21. Protti DJ. US RHIOs and the US nationwide health information network (NHIN): any lessons for Canadians? Healthcare Quarterly 2008;6:96-101.