Building a reference functional model for EHR systems

International Journal of Medical Informatics

Volumn 76, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 688-700

  Sumita, Yuki ^a   Takata, Mami ^a   Ishitsuka, Keiju ^b   Tominaga, Yasuyuki ^b   Ohe, Kazuhiko ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^b IBM JAPAN LTD   (Japan)

Author keywords

Electronic health record (EHR); Functional model; Functional representation; Medical record system, computerized; Meta functional model; Unified modeling language (UML)

Indexed keywords

ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD (EHR); FUNCTIONAL MODEL; FUNCTIONAL REPRESENTATION; MEDICAL RECORD SYSTEM; META FUNCTIONAL MODEL;

DATA ACQUISITION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; UNIFIED MODELING LANGUAGE;

ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT EXCHANGE;

ARTICLE; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; INTERVIEW; JAPAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS DESIGN; QUESTIONNAIRE; REFERENCE DATABASE; STANDARDIZATION; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; UNITED STATES;

JAPAN; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; SOFTWARE DESIGN; UNITED STATES;

EID: 34447502119     PISSN: 13865056     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.06.008     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ash J.S., and Bates D.W. Factors and forces affecting EHR system adoption: report of a 2004 ACMI discussion. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 12 1 (2005) 8-12
2. Institute of Medicine. Key Capabilities of an Electronic Health Record System: Letter Report (2003), National Academy Press, Washington, DC
3. Japan Association of Medical Informatics, JAMI Viewpoint Concerning the Definition of the Electronic Medical Record, 2003 (accessed October 18, 2005).
4. Middleton B., Hammond W.E., Brennan P.F., and Cooper G.F. Accelerating U.S. EHR adoption: how to get there from here. Recommendations based on the 2004 ACMI retreat. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 12 1 (2005) 13-19
5. Blobel B. Authorisation and access control for electronic health record systems. Int. J. Med. Inf. 73 3 (2004) 251-257
6. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Overview of Survey of Medical Institutions in 2002. URL: http://www.dbtk.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/data/160/2002/gaikyou/0004323/g232.htm l, 2002 (accessed September 16, 2005) (in Japanese).
7. Ohe K. Functional model of standardized computer-based patient record systems and directions. New Med. Jpn. 31 7 (2004) 73-76 (in Japanese)
8. Takata M., Sumita Y., Yanase T., Kumashiro T., and Ohe K. Analysis of the system functions based on investigation of EHR system operation hospitals. Proceedings of the 24th Joint Conference on Medical Informatics (2004) 1140-1141 (in Japanese)
9. OMG, UML 2.0 Infrastructure. URL: http://www.omg.org/technology/documents/formal/uml.htm, 2005 (accessed October 5, 2005).
10. Bauer B., and Odell J. UML 2.0 and agents: how to build agent-based systems with the new UML standard. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intel. 18 2 (2005) 141-157
11. Pilone D. UML Pocket Reference (2003), O'Reilly Media, Inc., Sebastopol, CA
12. HL7, Reference Information Model. URL: http://www.hl7.org/ (accessed October 9, 2005).
13. B. Blobel, Advanced and secure architectural EHR approaches, Int. J Med. Inf. (2005). URL: http://www.harcourt-international.com/journals/ijmi/ (accessed October 9, 2005) (e-pub ahead of print).
14. Goossen W.T., Jonker M.J., Heitmann K.U., Jongeneel-de Haas I.C., de Jong T., van der Slikke J.W., and Kabbes B.L. Electronic patient records: domain message information model perinatology. Int. J. Med. Inf. 70 2-3 (2003) 265-276
15. ISO/TS 18308:2004: Health Informatics-Requirements for an Electronic Health Record Architecture (2004) pp. 1-28
16. The Good European Health Record (GEHR). URL: http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/work-areas/ehrs/GEHR/index.htm, 2005 (accessed January 24, 2006).
17. Schramm I., and Webe V. Incremental EHR introduction considering the situation in health care and the current standards under development. Int. Congress Series 1230 (2001) 889-894
18. Duftschmid G., and Gall W. Representation of inter-patient relations within electronic healthcare record architectures. Med. Inform. Internet 29 1 (2004) 1-14
19. Open EHR, URL: http://www.openehr.org/, 2005 (accessed January 24, 2006).
20. Rhodes H., Mon D.T., and Dougherty M. The drive for an EHR standard picks up speed. J. Ahima 75 1 (2004) 18-22
21. HL7, EHR-S Functional Model and Standard July 2004 DSTU Package. URL: http://www.hl7.org/ehr/ (accessed September 16, 2005).
22. Chandrasekaran B., Goel A.K., and Iwasaki Y. Functional representation as design rationale. Computer 26 1 (1993) 48-56
23. Knowledge Based Systems, Inc. (KBSI). IDEF Family of Method for Concurrent Engineering and Business Re-engineering Applications (1992). http://www.idef.com/ URL: http://www.idef.com/ (accessed October 5, 2005)
24. Kim S.H., and Jang K.J. Designing performance analysis and IDEF0 for enterprise modelling in BPR. Int. J. Prod. Syst. 76 (2002) 121-133
25. Knowledge Based Systems, Inc. (KBSI), IDEFO Method Report: Draft Federal Information Standard Publication 183, 1993. URL: http://www.idef.com/ (accessed October 5, 2005).
26. Staccini P., Joubert M., Quaranta J.F., and Fieschi M. Mapping care processes within a hospital: from theory to a Web-based proposal merging enterprise modelling and ISO normative principles. Int. J. Med. Inf. 74 2-4 (2005) 335-344
27. Reimann D.M., and Sarkis J. Design for automating the inspection of manufacturing parts. Comput.-Integr. Manuf. Syst. 7 4 (1994) 262-278
28. Barreiro J., Labarga J., Rios J., and Vizan A. Functional model for the development of an inspection integration framework. Int. J. Mach. Tool. Manuf. 43 15 (2003) 1621-1632
29. IDEF0 overview. URL: http://www.idef.com/IDEF0.html, 2005 (accessed October 5, 2005).
30. Kitamura Y., and Mizoguchi R. Ontology-based description of functional knowledge and its use in a functional way server. Expert Syst. Appl. 24 2 (2003) 153-166
31. Kitamura Y., and Mizoguchi R. Ontology-based systemization of functional knowledge. J. Eng. Des. 15 4 (2004) 327-351
32. Kitamura Y., Kashiwase M., Fuse M., and Mizoguchi R. Deployment of an ontological framework of functional design knowledge. Adv. Eng. Inf. 18 (2004) 115-127
33. Saeki M. Ontology-based software development techniques. ERCIM News 58 (2004) 14
34. The list of the adoption status of electronic medical record system (hospitals). New Med. Jpn. 30 7 (2003) 93-107 (in Japanese)
35. SourceForge.net Project: TouchGraph. URL: http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/touchgraph/, 2001 (accessed October 10, 2005).
36. TouchGraph LLC. URL: http://www.touchgraph.com/, 2001 (accessed October 10, 2005).
37. Shadbolt N., Lewis P., Dasmahapatra S., Dupplaw D., Hu B., and Lewis H. MIAKT: combining grid and Web services for collaborative medical decision making. Proceedings of AHM2004 UK eScience All Hands Meeting (2004) 784-791
38. Alani H. TGVizTab: an ontology visualisation extension for Protégé. Proceedings of VIKE '03, Second International Conference on K-CAP 03 (2003)
39. OMG, XML Metadata Interchange (XMI) Specification. URL: http://www.omg.org/docs/formal/05-05-01.pdf (accessed October 10, 2005).
40. Cavalli A., Maag S., Papagiannaki S., and Verigakis G. From UML models to automatic generated tests for the dotLRN e-learning platform. Electr. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci. 116 19 (2005) 133-144
41. Knape T., Hederman L., Wade V.P., Gargan M., Harris C., and Rahman Y.A. UML approach to process modelling of clinical practice guidelines for enactment. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 95 (2003) 635-640
42. Chiorean D., Paşca M., Cârcu A., Botiza C., and Moldovan S. Ensuring UML models consistency using the OCL environment. Electr. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci. 102 2 (2004) 99-110
43. Siikarla M., Peltonen J., and Selonen P. Combining OCL and programming languages for UML model processing. Electr. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci. 102 2 (2004) 175-194