Response to 'Net reclassification improvement and decision theory' by Vickers et al

Statistics in Medicine

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 526-528

  D'Agostino Jr , Ralph B ^a   Vasan, Ramachandran S ^b  

^a WAKE FOREST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER INCIDENCE; DECISION THEORY; HUMAN; LETTER; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PROBABILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TUMOR BIOPSY;

EID: 67651095747     PISSN: 02776715     EISSN: 10970258     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sim.3475     Document Type: Letter

References (3)

1. Vickers AJ, Elkin EB, Steyerberg EW. Net reclassification improvement and decision theory. Statistics in Medicine 2008; DOI: 10.1002/ sim.3087.
2. Vergouwe Y, Steyerberg EW, Eijkemans MJ, Habbema JD. Validity of prognostic models: when is a model clinically useful? Seminars in Urologic Oncology 2002; 20:96-107.
3. Pencina MJ, D'Agostino Sr RB, D'Agostino Jr RB, Vasan RS. Comments on integrated discrimination and net reclassification improvements - practical advice. Statistics in Medicine 2008; 27(2):207-212.