Comments on 'Integrated discrimination and net reclassification improvements - Practical advice'

Statistics in Medicine

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 207-212

  Pencina, Michael J ^a   D'Agostino, Ralph B ^a,b   Vasan, Ramachandra S ^c  

^a Boston University   (United States)

^b WAKE FOREST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c FRAMINGHAM HEART STUDY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HIGH DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN;

CALIBRATION; CHI SQUARE TEST; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; INTEGRATED DISCRIMINATION AND NET RECLASSIFICATION IMPROVEMENT; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; NOTE; PREDICTION; PROBABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICAL MODEL; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 38849199636     PISSN: 02776715     EISSN: 10970258     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sim.3106     Document Type: Note

References (13)

1. Pencina MJ, D'Agostino Sr RB, D'Agostino Jr RB, Vasan RS. Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond. Statistics in Medicine 2007; DOI: 10.1002/sim.2929.
2. Pepe MS, Feng Z, Gu JW. Commentary on 'Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond'. Statistics in Medicine 2007; DOI: 10.1002/sim.2991.
3. Chi YY, Zhou XH. Commentary on 'Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker'. Statistics in Medicine 2007; DOI: 10.1002/ sim.2986.
4. Ware JH, Cai T. Commentary on 'Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond'. Statistics in Medicine 2007; DOI: 10.1002/sim.2985.
5. Greenland P. Commentary on 'Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond'. Statistics in Medicine 2007; DOI: 10.1002/sim.2976.
6. Cook NR. Commentary on 'Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker'. Statistics in Medicine 2007; DOI: 10.1002/sim.2987.
7. Kraemer HC. Commentary on 'Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker'. Statistics in Medicine 2007; DOI: 10.1002/sim.2948.
8. Greenland S. Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: the need for reorientation toward cost-effective prediction. Statistics in Medicine 2007; DOI: 10.1002/sim.2995.
9. 2 statistics for logistic regression. Statistics in Medicine 2006; 25: 1383-1395.
10. Korn EL, Graubard BI, Midhune D. Time-to-event analysis of longitudinal follow-up of a survey: choice of time scale. American Journal of Epidemiology 1997; 145(1):72-80.
11. Pencina MJ, Larson MG, D'Agostino RB. Choice of time scale and its effect on significance of predictors in longitudinal studies. Statistics in Medicine 2007; 26:1343-1359.
12. Kraemer H. Evaluating Medical Tests: Objective and Quantitative Guidelines. Sage Publications: Newbury Park, CA, 1992.
13. D'Agostino RB, Nam BH. Evaluation of the performance of survival analysis models: discrimination and calibration measures. Handbook of Statistics 2004; 23:1-25.