Fatigue life prediction of corrosion-damaged high-strength steel using an equivalent stress riser (ESR) model. Part II: Model development and results

International Journal of Fatigue

Volumn 31, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 1464-1475

  Rusk, D T ^a   Hoppe, W ^b   Braisted, W ^b   Powar, N ^b  

^a NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Corrosion fatigue; Fatigue initiation; Life prediction; Notches; Probabilistic analysis

Indexed keywords

AIRCRAFT COMPONENTS; AIRCRAFT STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS; ANALYTICAL METHOD; APPROXIMATE METHODS; CORRODED SURFACE; DEGREE OF CONFIDENCE; EMPIRICAL APPROACH; EQUIVALENT STRESS; FATIGUE ASSESSMENTS; FATIGUE CRACKING; FATIGUE CYCLES; FATIGUE INITIATION; FATIGUE LIFE; FATIGUE LIFE PREDICTION; FATIGUE LIFE REDUCTION; FATIGUE NOTCH SENSITIVITY; FATIGUE SPECIMEN; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; GENERAL CORROSION; HIGH STRESS; HIGH-STRENGTH STEELS; LIFE ANALYSIS; LIFE PREDICTION; LIFE PREDICTIONS; MATERIAL LOSS; MODEL DEVELOPMENT; MODELING TECHNIQUE; NOTCH FACTOR; NOTCHES; PETERSON; PROBABILISTIC ANALYSIS; REGION OF INTEREST; REGIONS OF INTEREST; STEEL COMPONENTS; SURFACE DAMAGES;

CONTROL THEORY; CRACK INITIATION; CRACKS; FATIGUE DAMAGE; FORECASTING; IMPACT STRENGTH; METAL ANALYSIS; MILITARY AIRCRAFT; STEEL; STRESS CORROSION CRACKING; SURFACE ROUGHNESS; SURFACES;

CORROSION FATIGUE;

EID: 67651094141     PISSN: 01421123     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.06.008     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Hoffman M.E., and Hoffman P.C. Corrosion and fatigue - structural issues and relevance to naval aviation. Int J Fatigue 23 (2001) S1-S10
2. Rusk DT, Hoppe W. Fatigue life prediction of corrosion-damaged high-strength steel using an equivalent stress riser (ESR) model. Part I: test development and results. Int J Fatigue, in press.
3. Fontana M. Corrosion engineering. 3rd ed. (1986), McGraw-Hill, New York p. 63
4. Mills T, Sharp PK, Loader C. The incorporation of pitting corrosion damage into F-111 fatigue life modeling, DSTO-RR-0237. Fishermans Bend, Australia: DSTO Aeronautical and Maritime Research Laboratory; June 2002.
5. Komai K. Life estimation of stress corrosion cracking and corrosion fatigue in structural materials. Kanazawa Kogyo Diagaku Zairyo Sisutemu (Mater Syst), Japan 19 19 (2000) 7-14
6. Harlow D.G., and Wei R.P. Probability approach for prediction of corrosion and corrosion fatigue life. AIAA J 32 10 (1994) 2073-2079
7. Wang Q.Y., Pidaparti R.M., and Palakal M.J. Comparative study of corrosion-fatigue in aircraft materials. AIAA J 39 2 (2001) 325-330
8. Shi P., and Mahadevan S. Damage tolerance approach for probabilistic pitting corrosion fatigue life prediction. Eng Fract Mech 68 (2001) 1493-1507
9. Dowling N.E. Mechanical behavior of materials. 2nd ed. (1999), Prentice Hall, New Jersey
10. Bannantine J.A., Comer J.J., and Handrock J.L. Fundamentals of metal fatigue analysis (1990), Prentice Hall, New Jersey
11. Peterson RE. Analytical approach to stress concentration effects in aircraft materials, TR 59-507. In: US Air Force - WADC symposium on the fatigue of metals, Dayton, OH, USA; 1959.
12. Neuber H. Theory of notch stresses: principle for exact stress calculations (1946), J.W. Edwards, Ann Arbor
13. Young W.C. Roark's formulas for stress and strain. 6th ed. (1989), Springer, New York
14. Pilkey W.D. Peterson's stress concentration factors. 2nd ed. (1997), John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York
15. Rungta R., Landgraf R., and Stephens R. Material properties. SAE fatigue design handbook. 3rd ed. (1997), SAE International, Warrendale (PA, USA)
16. Brown WF. Aerospace structural metals handbook, vol. 1. Columbus (OH, USA): Metals and Ceramics Information Center, Battelle Columbus Division; 1987.
17. ASTM Standard E 606. Standard practice for strain-controlled fatigue testing. West Conshohocken (PA, USA): ASTM International; 2004.
18. Weibull W. A statistical representation of fatigue failures in solids (1949), Transactions of the Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
19. ASTM Standard E 466. Standard practice for conducting force controlled constant amplitude axial fatigue tests of metallic materials. West Conshohocken (PA, USA): ASTM International; 1996.
20. Pascual F.G., and Meeker W.Q. Estimating fatigue curves with the random fatigue-limit model. Technometrics 41 4 (1999) 277-290
21. Socie D.F., and Marquis G.B. Multiaxial fatigue (2000), SAE International, Warrendale (PA, USA) p. 351
22. Myers R.H. Classical and modern regression with applications. 2nd ed. (1990), PWS-Kent
23. Hoppe W, Scott O, Braisted W, Abfalter G, Pierce J, Burke E, et al. Navy high-strength steel corrosion-fatigue modeling program, UDR-TR-2007-00039. Dayton (OH, USA): University of Dayton Research Institute; 2006.
24. Rasband W. ImageJ. Bethesda (MD, USA): US National Institutes of Health; 1997-2008. .
25. Rusk DT, Hoppe W, Braisted W, Powar N. Corrosion fatigue life prediction using an equivalent stress riser model. In: Proceedings of the eleventh joint NASA/FAA/DoD aging aircraft conference, Phoenix, AZ, USA, 21-24 April 2008.