Fatigue life prediction of corrosion-damaged high-strength steel using an equivalent stress riser (ESR) model. Part I: Test development and results

International Journal of Fatigue

Volumn 31, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 1454-1463

  Rusk, D T ^a   Hoppe, W ^b  

^a NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Corrosion fatigue; Fatigue initiation; Life prediction; Notches; Probabilistic analysis

Indexed keywords

3-D SURFACE TOPOGRAPHY; 3.5%NACL; AFTER-HEAT TREATMENT; AIRCRAFT COMPONENTS; AIRCRAFT STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS; CORRODED REGIONS; CORROSION DAMAGE; CORROSION GROWTH; DAMAGED SURFACES; EQUIVALENT STRESS; EXPOSURE LEVEL; FATIGUE ASSESSMENTS; FATIGUE CRACKING; FATIGUE INITIATION; FATIGUE LIFE; FATIGUE LIFE PREDICTION; FATIGUE TESTS; FILTER PAPERS; FLAT PLATE; FRACTOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS; HIGH RESOLUTION; HIGH STRENGTH STEEL; HIGH-STRENGTH STEELS; LIFE PREDICTION; MODEL DEVELOPMENT; MODELING APPROACH; NOTCHES; PROBABILISTIC ANALYSIS; STRESS LEVELS; TEST DEVELOPMENT; TEST PLATE; TEST SPECIMENS; WHITE LIGHT INTERFERENCE;

BEARING PADS; CORROSION; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; FATIGUE DAMAGE; FATIGUE TESTING; HEAT TREATMENT; IMPACT STRENGTH; METAL ANALYSIS; MILITARY AIRCRAFT; PLATES (STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS); SODIUM CHLORIDE; STEEL; SURFACE ROUGHNESS; SURFACE TESTING; SURFACES; TESTING; THERMAL EFFECTS; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

CORROSION FATIGUE;

EID: 67651001725     PISSN: 01421123     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.05.006     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Hoffman M.E., and Hoffman P.C. Corrosion and fatigue - structural issues and relevance to naval aviation. Int J Fatigue 23 (2001) S1-S10
2. Fontana M. Corrosion engineering. 3rd ed. (1986), McGraw-Hill, New York p. 63
3. ASTM Standard E 8. Standard test methods for tension testing of metallic materials. West Conshohocken, PA (USA): ASTM International; 2008.
4. Hoppe W, Scott O, Braisted W, Abfalter G, Pierce J, Burke E, et al. Navy High-Strength Steel Corrosion-Fatigue Modeling Program, UDR-TR-2007-00039. Dayton, OH (USA): University of Dayton Research Institute; October 2006.
5. Rusk DT, Arocho A, Pierce J, Abfalter, G. Results of fatigue tests of bare AF1410 steel unnotched flat plates with surface corrosion damage, NAWCADPAX/EDR-2008/10. Naval Air Systems Command, Patuxent River, MD (USA); April 2008.
6. Phull B. Evaluating corrosion fatigue. Corrosion: fundamentals, testing and protection. ASM handbook, vol. 13A. ASM International; 2003. p. 625-38.
7. ASTM Standard G 5-94. Standard reference test method for making potentiostatic and potentiodynamic anodic polarization measurements. West Conshohocken, PA (USA): ASTM International; 2004.
8. ASTM Standard G 61-86. Standard test method for conducting cyclic potentiodynamic polarization measurements for localized corrosion susceptibility of iron-, nickel-, or cobalt-based alloys. West Conshohocken, PA (USA): ASTM International; 2003.
9. ASTM Standard B 117-07a. Standard practice for operating salt spray (Fog) apparatus. West Conshohocken, PA (USA): ASTM International; 2007.
10. GM9540P. General motors engineering standard. Accelerated Lab Corrosion Test; December 1997.
11. ASTM Standard G 85-02e1. Standard practice for modified salt spray (Fog) testing. West Conshohocken, PA (USA): ASTM International; 2002.
12. ASTM Standard G 44-99. Standard practice for exposure of metals and alloys by alternate immersion in neutral 3.5% sodium chloride solution. West Conshohocken, PA (USA): ASTM International; 2005.
13. ® 4181L™ alkaline rust remover. Henkel Corp. .
14. Barter S. Fatigue crack growth in 7050T7451 aluminum alloy thick section plate with a surface condition simulating some regions of the F/A-18 structure, DSTO-TR-1458. Fishermans Bend, Australia: DSTO Platform Sciences Laboratory; July 2003.
15. ASTM Standard E 466-07. Standard practice for conducting force controlled constant amplitude axial fatigue tests of metallic materials. West Conshohocken, PA (USA): ASTM International; 2007.