Mitral annular shape, size, and motion in normals and in patients with cardiomyopathy: Evaluation with computed tomography

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 218-225

  Alkadhi, Hatem ^a   Desbiolles, Lotus ^a   Stolzmann, Paul ^a   Leschka, Sebastian ^a   Scheffel, Hans ^a   Plass, André ^a   Schertler, Thomas ^a   Trindade, Pedro Trigo ^a   Genoni, Michele ^a   Cattin, Philippe ^b,c   Marincek, Borut ^a   Frauenfelder, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Cardiomyopathy; Computed tomography; Mitral annulus; Motion

Indexed keywords

IOPROMIDE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CARDIOMYOPATHY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONGESTIVE CARDIOMYOPATHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART CYCLE; HUMAN; HYPERTROPHIC OBSTRUCTIVE CARDIOMYOPATHY; IMAGING SYSTEM; MALE; MITRAL ANNULOPLASTY; MITRAL VALVE; MITRAL VALVE DISEASE; MOTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RR INTERVAL;

AGED; CARDIOMYOPATHIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MITRAL VALVE; ORGAN SIZE; REFERENCE STANDARDS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 67651087220     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: 15360210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181994a73     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Timek TA, Miller DC. Experimental and clinical assessment of mitral annular area and dynamics: what are we actually measuring? Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72:966-974.
2. Boltwood CM, Tei C, Wong M, et al. Quantitative echocardiography of the mitral complex in dilated cardiomyopathy: the mechanism of functional mitral regurgitation. Circulation. 1983;68:498-508.
3. Duplessis LA, Marchand P. The Anatomy of the mitral valve and its associated structures. Thorax. 1964;19:221-227.
4. Flachskampf FA, Chandra S, Gaddipatti A, et al. Analysis of shape and motion of the mitral annulus in subjects with and without cardiomyopathy by echocardiographic 3-dimensional reconstruction. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2000;13:277-287.
5. Simonson JS, Schiller NB. Descent of the base of the left ventricle: an echocardiographic index of left ventricular function. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1989;2:25-35.
6. Lai DT, Tibayan FA, Myrmel T, et al. Mechanistic insights into posterior mitral leaflet inter-scallop malcoaptation during acute ischemic mitral regurgitation. Circulation. 2002;106:I40-I45.
7. Romano MA, Bolling SF. Update on mitral repair in dilated cardiomyopathy. J Card Surg. 2004;19:396-400.
8. Tahta SA, Oury JH, Maxwell JM, et al. Outcome after mitral valve repair for functional ischemic mitral regurgitation. J Heart Valve Dis. 2002;11:11-18; discussion 18-19.
9. Totaro P, Adragna N, Argano V. Restrictive annuloplasty to treat functional mitral regurgitation: optimize the restriction to improve the results? J Heart Valve Dis. 2008;17:155-160; discussion 161.
10. Cosgrove DM III, Arcidi JM, Rodriguez L, et al. Initial experience with the Cosgrove-Edwards Annuloplasty System. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;60:499-503.
11. Maselli D, Guarracino F, Chiaramonti F, et al. Percutaneous mitral annuloplasty: an anatomic study of human coronary sinus and its relation with mitral valve annulus and coronary arteries. Circulation. 2006;114:377-380.
12. Tsakiris AG, Von Bernuth G, Rastelli GC, et al. Size and motion of the mitral valve annulus in anesthetized intact dogs. J Appl Physiol. 1971;30:611-618.
13. Gorman JH III, Gupta KB, Streicher JT, et al. Dynamic three-dimensional imaging of the mitral valve and left ventricle by rapid sonomicrometry array localization. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;112:712-726.
14. Komoda T, Hetzer R, Uyama C, et al. Mitral annular function assessed by 3D imaging for mitral valve surgery. J Heart Valve Dis. 1994;3:483-490.
15. Ormiston JA, Shah PM, Tei C, et al. Size and motion of the mitral valve annulus in man. I. A two-dimensional echocardiographic method and findings in normal subjects. Circulation. 1981;64:113-120.
16. Dall'Agata A, Taams MA, Fioretti PM, et al. Cosgrove-Edwards mitral ring dynamics measured with transesophageal three-dimensional echocardiography. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;65:485-490.
17. Gillinov AM, Cosgrove DM III, Shiota T, et al. Cosgrove-Edwards Annuloplasty System: midterm results. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;69:717-721.
18. Pai RG, Tanimoto M, Jintapakorn W, et al. Volume-rendered three-dimensional dynamic anatomy of the mitral annulus using a transesophageal echocardiographic technique. J Heart Valve Dis. 1995;4:623-627.
19. Tibayan FA, Rodriguez F, Langer F, et al. Annular remodeling in chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation: ring selection implications. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;76:1549-1554; discussion 1554-1555.
20. Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A, et al. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J. 2005;26:1482-1487.
21. Jassal DS, Shapiro MD, Neilan TG, et al. 64-slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) for detection of aortic regurgitation and quantification of severity. Invest Radiol. 2007;42:507-512.
22. Lembcke A, Kivelitz DE, Borges AC. Quantification of aortic valve stenosis: head-to-head comparison of 64-slice spiral computed tomography with transesophageal and transethoracic echocardiography and cardiac catheterization. Invest Radiol. 2009;44:7-14.
23. Lembcke A, Thiele H, Lachnitt A, et al. Precision of forty slice spiral computed tomography for quantifying aortic valve stenosis: comparison with echocardiography and validation against cardiac catheterization. Invest Radiol. 2008;43:719-728.
24. Alkadhi H, Wildermuth S, Bettex DA, et al. Mitral regurgitation: quantification with 16-detector row CT-initial experience. Radiology. 2006;238:454-463.
25. Hess OM, McKenna WJ, Schultheiss HP. Myocardial disease. In: Camm AJ, Luescher TF, Serruys PW, eds. The ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2006:453-516.
26. Henry WL, Gardin JM, Ware JH. Echocardiographic measurements in normal subjects from infancy to old age. Circulation. 1980;62:1054-1061.
27. Wilson PW, D'Agostino RB, Levy D, et al. Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. Circulation. 1998;97:1837-1847.
28. Ho SY. Anatomy of the mitral valve. Heart. 2002;88(suppl 4):iv5-iv10.
29. Hoppe H, DeRose T, Duchamp T, et al. Surface reconstruction from unorganized points. Comput Graph. 1992;26:71-78.
30. Chiechi MA, Lees WM, Thompson R. Functional anatomy of the normal mitral valve. J Thorac Surg. 1956;32:378-398.
31. Mann DL, Bristow MR. Mechanisms and models in heart failure: the biomechanical model and beyond. Circulation. 2005;111:2837-2849.
32. Salgo IS, Gorman JH III, Gorman RC, et al. Effect of annular shape on leaflet curvature in reducing mitral leaflet stress. Circulation. 2002;106:711-717.
33. van Rijk-Zwikker GL, Mast F, Schipperheyn JJ, et al. Comparison of rigid and flexible rings for annuloplasty of the porcine mitral valve. Circulation.1990;82:IV58-IV64.
34. Borghetti V, Campana M, Scotti C, et al. Biological versus prosthetic ring in mitral-valve repair: enhancement of mitral annulus dynamics and left-ventricular function with pericardial annuloplasty at long term. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000;17:431-439.
35. Flohr TG, McCollough CH, Bruder H, et al. First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:256-268.