Patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes after overnight orthokeratology

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 86, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 875-882

  Hiraoka, Takahiro ^a   Okamoto, Chikako ^a   Ishii, Yuko ^a   Kakita, Tetsuhiko ^b   Okamoto, Fumiki ^a   Takahashi, Hideto ^a   Oshika, Tetsuro ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TSUKUBA   (Japan)

^b Kakita Eye Clinic   (Japan)

Author keywords

Contrast sensitivity; Higher order aberrations; Mesopic vision; Overnight orthokeratology; Patient satisfaction

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; HIGHER-ORDER ABERRATIONS; MESOPIC VISION; OVERNIGHT ORTHOKERATOLOGY; PATIENT SATISFACTION;

ABERRATIONS; REFRACTION; VISION;

CONTACT LENSES;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; EYE REFRACTION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; MYOPIA; ORTHOKERATOLOGY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISION; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ADULT; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MYOPIA; ORTHOKERATOLOGIC PROCEDURES; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ACUITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 67651062409     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181ae34d5     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Swarbrick HA, Wong G, O'Leary DJ. Corneal response to orthokeratology. Optom Vis Sci 1998;75:791-799
2. Alharbi A, Swarbrick HA. The effects of overnight orthokeratology lens wear on corneal thickness. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:2518-2523 (Pubitemid 36618409)
3. Swarbrick HA. Orthokeratology review and update. Clin Exp Optom 2006;89:124-143
4. Nichols JJ, Marsich MM, Nguyen M, Barr JT, Bullimore MA. Overnight orthokeratology. Optom Vis Sci 2000;77:252-259
5. Mountford J. An analysis of the changes in corneal shape and refractive error induced by accelerated orthokeratology. Int Contact Lens Clin 1997;24:128-144 (Pubitemid 127165445)
6. Rah MJ, Jackson JM, Jones LA, Marsden HJ, Bailey MD, Barr JT. Overnight orthokeratology: preliminary results of the Lenses and Overnight Orthokeratology (LOOK) study. Optom Vis Sci 2002;79:598-605.
7. Cheung SW, Cho P. Subjective and objective assessments of the effect of orthokeratology - a cross-sectional study. Curr Eye Res 2004;28:121-127 (Pubitemid 38200946)
8. Hiraoka T, Furuya A, Matsumoto Y, Okamoto F, Sakata N, Hiratsuka K, Kakita T, Oshika T. Quantitative evaluation of regular and irregular corneal astigmatism in patients having overnight orthokeratology. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004;30:1425-1429 (Pubitemid 38802884)
9. Hiraoka T, Matsumoto Y, Okamoto F, Yamaguchi T, Hirohara Y, Mihashi T, Oshika T. Corneal higher-order aberrations induced by overnight orthokeratology. Am J Ophthalmol 2005;139:429-436 (Pubitemid 40379068)
10. Joslin CE, Wu SM, McMahon TT, Shahidi M. Higher-order wavefront aberrations in corneal refractive therapy. Optom Vis Sci 2003;80:805-811 (Pubitemid 38010098)
11. Berntsen DA, Barr JT, Mitchell GL. The effect of overnight contact lens corneal reshaping on higher-order aberrations and best-corrected visual acuity. Optom Vis Sci 2005;82:490-497
12. Hiraoka T, Okamoto C, Ishii Y, Kakita T, Oshika T. Contrast sensitivity function and ocular higher-order aberrations following overnight orthokeratology. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48:550-556 (Pubitemid 351260684)
13. Bourque LB, Cosand BB, Drews C, Waring GO III, Lynn M, Cartwright C. Reported satisfaction, fluctuation of vision, and glare among patients one year after surgery in the Prospective Evaluation of Radial Keratotomy (PERK) Study. Arch Ophthalmol 1986;104:356-363 (Pubitemid 16132993)
14. Kraff MC, Sanders DR, Karcher D, Raanan M, DeLuca M, Neumann G. Changing practice patterns in refractive surgery: results of a survey of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 1994;20:172-178 (Pubitemid 24100172)
15. Kahle G, Seiler T, Wollensak J. Report on psychosocial findings and satisfaction among patients 1 year after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. Refract Corneal Surg 1992;8:286-289
16. Gimbel HV, Van Westenbrugge JA, Johnson WH, Willerscheidt AB, Sun R, Ferensowicz M. Visual, refractive, and patient satisfaction results following bilateral photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. Refract Corneal Surg 1993;9(2 Suppl):S5-10. (Pubitemid 23117285)
17. Fichte CM, Bell AM. Ongoing results of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for myopia: subjective patient impressions. J Cataract Refract Surg 1994;20(Suppl):268-270 (Pubitemid 24106547)
18. Halliday BL. Refractive and visual results and patient satisfaction after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. Br J Ophthalmol 1995;79:881-887
19. Freitas C, Oliveiros BM, Marques E, Leite EB. Effect of photorefractive keratectomy on visual functioning and quality of life. J Refract Surg 1995;11:S327-34.
20. McGhee CN, Orr D, Kidd B, Stark C, Bryce IG, Anastas CN. Psychological aspects of excimer laser surgery for myopia: reasons for seeking treatment and patient satisfaction. Br J Ophthalmol 1996;80:874-879 (Pubitemid 26366554)
21. Shah SI, Hersh PS. Photorefractive keratectomy for myopia with a 6-mm beam diameter. J Refract Surg 1996;12:341-346 (Pubitemid 26114683)
22. Ben-Sira A, Loewenstein A, Lipshitz I, Levanon D, Lazar M. Patient satisfaction after 5.0-mm photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. J Refract Surg 1997;13:129-134 (Pubitemid 27203269)
23. Rushood AA, Nassim HM, Azeemuddin T. Patient satisfaction after photorefractive keratectomy for low myopia using the visual analogue scale. J Refract Surg 1997;13:S438-40. (Pubitemid 27513136)
24. Shah S, Perera S, Chatterjee A. Satisfaction after photorefractive keratectomy. J Refract Surg 1998;14:S226-7.
25. Knorz MC, Wiesinger B, Liermann A, Seiberth V, Liesenhoff H. Laser in situ keratomileusis for moderate and high myopia and myopic astigmatism. Ophthalmology 1998;105:932-940 (Pubitemid 28225504)
26. McGhee CN, Craig JP, Sachdev N, Weed KH, Brown AD. Functional, psychological, and satisfaction outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg 2000;26:497-509. (Pubitemid 30212951)
27. Miller AE, McCulley JP, Bowman RW, Cavanagh HD, Wang XH. Patient satisfaction after LASIK for myopia. CLAO J 2001;27:84-88
28. Bailey MD, Mitchell GL, Dhaliwal DK, Boxer Wachler BS, Zadnik K. Patient satisfaction and visual symptoms after laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology 2003;110:1371-1378 (Pubitemid 36842474)
29. Hammond SD Jr, Puri AK, Ambati BK. Quality of vision and patient satisfaction after LASIK. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2004;15:328-332 (Pubitemid 38962113)
30. Soroka M, Crump T, Bennett A. Patient satisfaction with LASIK surgery in New York State. Manag Care Interface 2005;18:59-62. (Pubitemid 40740547)
31. Lipson MJ, Sugar A, Musch DC. Overnight corneal reshaping versus soft disposable contact lenses: vision-related quality-of-life differences from a randomized clinical trial. Optom Vis Sci 2005;82:886-891 (Pubitemid 41566870)
32. Ritchey ER, Barr JT, Mitchell GL. The comparison of overnight lens modalities (COLM) study. Eye Contact Lens 2005;31:70-75
33. Berntsen DA, Mitchell GL, Barr JT. The effect of overnight contact lens corneal reshaping on refractive error-specific quality of life. Optom Vis Sci 2006;83:354-359
34. Kuroda T, Fujikado T, Maeda N, Oshika T, Hirohara Y, Mihashi T. Wavefront analysis of higher-order aberrations in patients with cataract. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002;28:438-444 (Pubitemid 34208020)
35. Yamane N, Miyata K, Samejima T, Hiraoka T, Kiuchi T, Okamoto F, Hirohara Y, Mihashi T, Oshika T. Ocular higher-order aberrations and contrast sensitivity after conventional laser in situ keratomileusis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:3986-3990 (Pubitemid 39411151)
36. Applegate RA, Howland HC, Sharp RP, Cottingham AJ, Yee RW. Corneal aberrations and visual performance after radial keratotomy. J Refract Surg 1998;14:397-407. (Pubitemid 28350703)
37. Ninomiya S, Maeda N, Kuroda T, Fujikado T, Tano Y. Comparison of ocular higher-order aberrations and visual performance between photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia. Semin Ophthalmol 2003;18:29-34. (Pubitemid 36993551)
38. Maeda N, Sato S, Watanabe H, Inoue Y, Fujikado T, Shimomura Y, Tano Y. Prediction of letter contrast sensitivity using videokeratographic indices. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;129:759-763 (Pubitemid 30604155)
39. Schlote T, Kriegerowski M, Bende T, Derse M, Thiel HJ, Jean B. Mesopic vision in myopia corrected by photorefractive keratectomy, soft contact lenses, and spectacles. J Cataract Refract Surg 1997;23:718-725 (Pubitemid 27357991)
40. Nagy ZZ, Munkacsy G, Krueger RR. Changes in mesopic vision after photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. J Refract Surg 2002;18:249-252 (Pubitemid 34553044)
41. Perez-Carrasco MJ, Puell MC, Sanchez-Ramos C, Lopez-Castro A, Langa A. Effect of a yellow filter on contrast sensitivity and disability glare after laser in situ keratomileusis under mesopic and photopic conditions. J Refract Surg 2005;21:158-165 (Pubitemid 40404437)
42. Puell MC, Palomo C, Sanchez-Ramos C, Villena C. Mesopic contrast sensitivity in the presence or absence of glare in a large driver population. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2004;242:755-761 (Pubitemid 39386375)
43. Hiraoka T, Okamoto C, Ishii Y, Takahira T, Kakita T, Oshika T. Mesopic contrast sensitivity and ocular higher-order aberrations after overnight orthokeratology. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;145:645-655 (Pubitemid 351260684)
44. Wachler BS, Krueger RR. Normalized contrast sensitivity values. J Refract Surg 1998;14:463-466
45. Pesudovs K, Garamendi E, Elliott DB. The Quality of Life Impact of Refractive Correction (QIRC) Questionnaire: development and validation. Optom Vis Sci 2004;81:769-777 (Pubitemid 39363472)
46. Garamendi E, Pesudovs K, Stevens MJ, Elliott DB. The Refractive Status and Vision Profile: evaluation of psychometric properties and comparison of Rasch and summated Likert-scaling. Vision Res 2006;46:1375-1383 (Pubitemid 43075312)
47. Pesudovs K, Garamendi E, Elliott DB. The Contact Lens Impact on Quality of Life (CLIQ) Questionnaire: development and validation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:2789-2796 (Pubitemid 351639748)
48. Nichols JJ, Mitchell GL, Saracino M, Zadnik K. Reliability and validity of refractive error-specific quality-of-life instruments. Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:1289-1296 (Pubitemid 37128407)
49. Berry S, Mangione CM, Lindblad AS, McDonnell PJ. Development of the National Eye Institute refractive error correction quality of life questionnaire: focus groups. Ophthalmology 2003;110:2285-2291 (Pubitemid 37485156)
50. Hays RD, Mangione CM, Ellwein L, Lindblad AS, Spritzer KL, McDonnell PJ. Psychometric properties of the National Eye Institute- Refractive Error Quality of Life instrument. Ophthalmology 2003;110:2292-2301 (Pubitemid 37485157)
51. McDonnell PJ, Mangione C, Lee P, Lindblad AS, Spritzer KL, Berry S, Hays RD. Responsiveness of the National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of Life instrument to surgical correction of refractive error. Ophthalmology 2003;110:2302-2309 (Pubitemid 37485158)
52. Nichols JJ, Twa MD, Mitchell GL. Sensitivity of the National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of Life instrument to refractive surgery outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31:2313-2318