Overnight corneal reshaping versus soft disposable contact lenses: Vision-related quality-of-life differences from a randomized clinical trial

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 82, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 886-891

  Lipson, Michael J ^a,c   Sugar, Alan ^a   Musch, David C ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomedics 55 disposable lenses; CRT; Orthokeratology; Overnight corneal reshaping; Paragon; Visual quality of life

Indexed keywords

CATHODE RAY TUBES; LIGHT REFRACTION; MEDICAL IMAGING; MEDICAL PROBLEMS; PATIENT MONITORING; VISION;

BIOMEDICS 55 DISPOSABLE LENSES; ORTHOKERATOLOGY; OVERNIGHT CORNEAL RESHAPING (OCR); PARAGON; VISUAL QUALITY OF LIFE;

OPTICAL INSTRUMENT LENSES;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTACT LENS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA EPITHELIUM; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DEVICE; DISPOSABLE EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LENS IMPLANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REFRACTION ERROR; SLIT LAMP; SYMPTOMATOLOGY; VISION; VISUAL ACUITY;

ADULT; CIRCADIAN RHYTHM; CONTACT LENSES; CONTACT LENSES, HYDROPHILIC; CORNEA; CORNEAL TOPOGRAPHY; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; DISPOSABLE EQUIPMENT; HUMANS; MYOPIA; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITY OF LIFE; SLEEP; VISION; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 27644446132     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.opx.0000180818.40127.dc     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Barr J. The Contact Lens Spectrum Millennium Report. Contact Lens Spectrum 2000;14:24-30.
2. Hays RD, Spritzer KL. National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of Life Instrument (NEI-RQL-42 TM), version 1.0. A Manual for Use and Scoring. Los Angeles: Rand Corp, 2002.
3. Vitale S, Schein OD, Meinert CL, Steinberg EP. The refractive status and vision profile: a questionnaire to measure vision-related quality of life in persons with refractive error. Ophthalmology 2000;107: 1529-39.
4. Mangione CM, Berry S, Spritzer K, Janz NK, Klein R, Owsley C, Lee PP. Identifying the content area for the 51-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire: results from focus groups with visually impaired persons. Arch Ophthalmol 1998;116:227-33.
5. Walline JJ, Bailey MD, Zadnik K. Vision-specific quality of life and modes of refractive error correction. Optom Vis Sci 2000;77:648-52.
6. Bailey IL, Lovie JE. New design principles for visual acuity letter charts. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1976;53:740-5.
7. Camparini M, Cassinari P, Ferrigno L, Macaluso C. ETDRS-fast: implementing psychophysical adaptive methods to standardized visual acuity measurement with ETDRS charts. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42:1226-31.
8. Bailey IL, Bullimore MA, Raasch TW, Taylor HR. Clinical grading and the effects of scaling. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991;32: 422-32.
9. Hazel CA, Elliott DB. The dependency of logMAR visual acuity measurements on chart design and scoring rule. Optom Vis Sci 2002; 79:788-92.
10. Williams B. Footcandles and lux for architectural lighting, an introduction to illuminance, edition 2.1. Available at: http://wwvv.mts.net/ william5/library/illum.htm. Accessed October 5, 2004.
11. Oregon Department of Energy. Illuminance. Available at: http://www. energy.state.or.us/bus/light/illuminance.htm. Accessed April 11, 2005.
12. Lipson MJ, Sugar A, Musch DC. Overnight corneal reshaping versus soft daily wear: a visual quality of life study (interim results). Eye Contact Lens 2004;30:214-7.
13. Swarbrick HA, Wong G, O'Leary DJ. Corneal response to orthokeratology. Optom Vis Sci 1998;75:791-9.
14. Mountford J. An analysis of changes in corneal shape and refractive error induced by accelerated orthokeratology. ICLC 1997;24: 128-43.
15. Alharbi A, Swarbrick HA. The effects of overnight orthokeratology lens wear on corneal thickness. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44: 2518-23.
16. Sridharan R, Swarbrick H. Corneal response to short-term orthokeratology lens wear. Optom Vis Sci 2003;80:200-6.
17. Wang J, Fonn D, Simpson TL, Sorbara L, Kort R, Jones L. Topographical thickness of the epithelium and total cornea after overnight wear of reverse-geometry rigid contact lenses for myopia reduction. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:4742-6.
18. Nichols JJ, Marsich MM, Nguyen M, Barr JT, Bullimore MA. Overnight orthokeratology. Optom Vis Sci 2000;77:252-9.
19. Bergmanson JP, Ruben CM, Chu LW. Epithelial morphological response to soft hydrogel contact lenses. Br J Ophthalmol 1985;69: 373-9.
20. Nieuwendaal CP, Odenthal MT, Kok JH, Venema HW, Oosting J, Riemslag FC, Kijlstra A. Morphology and function of the corneal endothelium after long-term contact lens wear. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1994;35:3071-7.
21. Wang J, Fonn D, Simpson TL. Topographical thickness of the epithelium and total cornea after hydrogel and PMMA contact lens wear with eye closure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:1070-4.
22. Oliveira-Soto L, Efron N. Morphology of corneal nerves in soft contact lens wear. A comparative study using confocal microscopy. Ophthal Physiol Opt 2003;23:163-74.
23. US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Summary of Safety and Effectiveness, Premarket Approval Application Supplement #P870024/S43. January 18, 2002. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/ cdrh/pdf/P870024S043b.pdf. Accessed July 20, 2005.
24. Hiraoka T, Matsumoto Y, Okamoto F, Yamaguchi T, Hirohara Y, Mihashi T, Oshika T. Corneal higher-order aberrations induced by overnight orthokeratology. Invest Ophthal Vis Sci 2004;45:E-abstract 1548.
25. Berntsen DA, Barr JT, Mitchell GL. Higher-order aberration changes after corneal refractive therapy (CRT). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:E-abstract 1543.
26. Lee JJ, Sindt C, Fario AA. The effect of spherical aberration induced by a contact lens model on subjective and objective visual function. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:E-abstract 1558.
27. Dietze HH, Cox MJ. Correcting ocular spherical aberration with soft contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:E-abstract 3286.
28. Dietze HH, Cox MJ. On- and off-eye spherical aberration of soft contact lenses and consequent changes of effective lens power. Optom Vis Sci 2003;80:126-34.
29. Hiraoka T, Matsumoto Y, Okamoto F, Yamaguchi T, Hirohara Y, Mihashi T, Oshika T. Corneal higher-order aberrations induced by overnight orthokeratology. Am J Ophthalmol 2005;139:429-36.
30. Rah MJ, Bailey MD, Hayes J, Kwok A, Zadnik K. Comparison of NEI RQL-42 scores in LASIK vs CRT Patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004;45:E-abstract 1578.
31. Ucakhan OO, Sokol J, Brodie SE, Asbell PA. Characteristics of the myopic patient population applying for refractive surgery. CLAO J 2000;26:102-5.
32. Ritchey ER, Barr JT, Mitchell GL. The Comparison of Overnight Lens Modalities (COLM) study. Eye Contact Lens 2005;31:70-5.
33. Giese M, Weissman B. Contact lens associated corneal infection. Where do we go from here? Clin Exp Optom 2002;85:141-8.
34. Young AL, Leung AT, Cheng LL, Law RW, Wong AK, Lam DS. Orthokeratology lens-related corneal ulcers in children: a case series. Ophthalmology 2004;111:590-5.
35. Lang J, Rah MJ. Adverse corneal events associated with corneal reshaping: a case series. Eye Contact Lens 2004;30:231-3.