-
1
-
-
0033157130
-
Cost and effectiveness of the California triple marker prenatal screening program
-
Cunningham GC, Tompkinison DG. Cost and effectiveness of the California triple marker prenatal screening program. Genet Med 1999;1:199-206.
-
(1999)
Genet Med
, vol.1
, pp. 199-206
-
-
Cunningham, G.C.1
Tompkinison, D.G.2
-
2
-
-
84869541916
-
-
California Code of Regulations, Title 17, Section 6532. Current as of January 09, 2009. Available at: January 09, 2009
-
California Code of Regulations, Title 17, Section 6532. Current as of January 09, 2009. Available at: http://ccr.oal.ca.gov/ linkedslice/default.asp? SP=CCR-1000&Action=Welcome. Retrieved January 09, 2009.
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
0023726523
-
-
Wald NJ, Cuckle HS, DensemJW, Nanchahal K, Royston P, Chard T, et al. Maternal serum screening for Down's syndrome in early pregnancy [published erratum appears in BMJ 1988;297:1029]. BMJ 1988;297:883-7.
-
Wald NJ, Cuckle HS, DensemJW, Nanchahal K, Royston P, Chard T, et al. Maternal serum screening for Down's syndrome in early pregnancy [published erratum appears in BMJ 1988;297:1029]. BMJ 1988;297:883-7.
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
0029076149
-
Risk-based prenatal screening for trisomy 18 using alpha-fetoprotein, unconjugated oestriol and human chorionic gonadotropin
-
Palomaki GE, Haddow JE, Knight GJ, Wald NJ, Kennard A, Canick JA, et al. Risk-based prenatal screening for trisomy 18 using alpha-fetoprotein, unconjugated oestriol and human chorionic gonadotropin. Prenat Diagn 1995;15:713-23.
-
(1995)
Prenat Diagn
, vol.15
, pp. 713-723
-
-
Palomaki, G.E.1
Haddow, J.E.2
Knight, G.J.3
Wald, N.J.4
Kennard, A.5
Canick, J.A.6
-
5
-
-
0036227897
-
Revised estimates of the maternal age specific live birth prevalence of Down's syndrome
-
Morris JK, Mutton DE, Alberman E. Revised estimates of the maternal age specific live birth prevalence of Down's syndrome. J Med Screen 2002;9:2-6.
-
(2002)
J Med Screen
, vol.9
, pp. 2-6
-
-
Morris, J.K.1
Mutton, D.E.2
Alberman, E.3
-
7
-
-
20444448875
-
Down syndrome working group, ACMG Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee. Technical standards and guidelines: Prenatal screening for Down syndrome
-
Palomaki GE, Bradley LA, McDowell GA, Down syndrome working group, ACMG Laboratory Quality Assurance Committee. Technical standards and guidelines: prenatal screening for Down syndrome. Genet Med 2005;7:344-54.
-
(2005)
Genet Med
, vol.7
, pp. 344-354
-
-
Palomaki, G.E.1
Bradley, L.A.2
McDowell, G.A.3
-
8
-
-
67651040128
-
-
SAS Institute, Inc. SAS software of statistical analysis. Version 9.1.3. Cary NC, SAS Institute, Inc, 2005
-
SAS Institute, Inc. SAS software of statistical analysis. Version 9.1.3. Cary (NC): SAS Institute, Inc.; 2005.
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
67651015299
-
-
National Center for Health Statistics. 2006 birth tables. National Vital Statistics System. Hyattsville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, National Center for Health Statistics. Available at: http://205.207.175.93/ VitalStats/TableViewer/tableView.aspx?ReportId=15095.
-
National Center for Health Statistics. 2006 birth tables. National Vital Statistics System. Hyattsville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, National Center for Health Statistics. Available at: http://205.207.175.93/ VitalStats/TableViewer/tableView.aspx?ReportId=15095.
-
-
-
-
10
-
-
0030345497
-
Maternal serum screening. Number 228, September 1996 (replaces no. 154, April 1991). Committee on Educational Bulletins of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
-
ACOG educational bulletin
-
ACOG educational bulletin. Maternal serum screening. Number 228, September 1996 (replaces no. 154, April 1991). Committee on Educational Bulletins of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1996;55:299-308.
-
(1996)
Int J Gynaecol Obstet
, vol.55
, pp. 299-308
-
-
-
11
-
-
0031395671
-
-
Wald NJ, Kennard A, Hackshaw A, McGuire A. Antenatal screening for Down's syndrome [published erratum appears in J Med Screen 1998;5:110.J Med Screen 1998;5:166]. J Med Screen 1997;4:181-246.
-
Wald NJ, Kennard A, Hackshaw A, McGuire A. Antenatal screening for Down's syndrome [published erratum appears in J Med Screen 1998;5:110.J Med Screen 1998;5:166]. J Med Screen 1997;4:181-246.
-
-
-
-
12
-
-
0037704145
-
First and second trimester antenatal screening for Down's syndrome: The results of the Serum, Urine and Ultrasound Screening Study (SURUSS)
-
Wald NJ, Rodeck C, Hackshaw AK, Walters J, Chitty L, Mackinson AM. First and second trimester antenatal screening for Down's syndrome: the results of the Serum, Urine and Ultrasound Screening Study (SURUSS). J Med Screen 2003; 10:56-104.
-
(2003)
J Med Screen
, vol.10
, pp. 56-104
-
-
Wald, N.J.1
Rodeck, C.2
Hackshaw, A.K.3
Walters, J.4
Chitty, L.5
Mackinson, A.M.6
-
13
-
-
0031736506
-
Estimating the spontaneous loss of Down syndrome fetuses between the times of chorionic villus sampling, amniocentesis and livebirth
-
Bray IC, Wright DE. Estimating the spontaneous loss of Down syndrome fetuses between the times of chorionic villus sampling, amniocentesis and livebirth. Prenat Diagn 1998;18: 1045-54.
-
(1998)
Prenat Diagn
, vol.18
, pp. 1045-1054
-
-
Bray, I.C.1
Wright, D.E.2
-
14
-
-
0032730221
-
Down syndrome fetal loss rate in early pregnancy
-
Cuckle H. Down syndrome fetal loss rate in early pregnancy. Prenat Diagn 1999;19:1177-9.
-
(1999)
Prenat Diagn
, vol.19
, pp. 1177-1179
-
-
Cuckle, H.1
-
15
-
-
0029029162
-
New estimates of Down syndrome risks at chorionic villus sampling, amniocentesis, and livebirth in women of advanced maternal age from a uniquely defined population
-
Halliday JL, Watson LF, Lumley J, Danks DM, Sheffield LJ. New estimates of Down syndrome risks at chorionic villus sampling, amniocentesis, and livebirth in women of advanced maternal age from a uniquely defined population. Prenat Diagn 1995;15:455-65.
-
(1995)
Prenat Diagn
, vol.15
, pp. 455-465
-
-
Halliday, J.L.1
Watson, L.F.2
Lumley, J.3
Danks, D.M.4
Sheffield, L.J.5
-
16
-
-
27744477773
-
First-trimester or second-trimester screening, or both, for Down's syndrome
-
Malone FD, Canick JA, Ball RH, Nyberg DA, Comstock CH, Bukowski R, et al. First-trimester or second-trimester screening, or both, for Down's syndrome. N Engl J Med 2005;353: 2001-11.
-
(2005)
N Engl J Med
, vol.353
, pp. 2001-2011
-
-
Malone, F.D.1
Canick, J.A.2
Ball, R.H.3
Nyberg, D.A.4
Comstock, C.H.5
Bukowski, R.6
-
17
-
-
0141863495
-
First-trimester screening for trisomies 21 and 18
-
Wapner R, Thom E, Simpson JL, Pergament E, Silver R, Filkins K, et al. First-trimester screening for trisomies 21 and 18. N EnglJ Med 2003;349:1405-13.
-
(2003)
N EnglJ Med
, vol.349
, pp. 1405-1413
-
-
Wapner, R.1
Thom, E.2
Simpson, J.L.3
Pergament, E.4
Silver, R.5
Filkins, K.6
-
18
-
-
15944409220
-
Multicenter study of first-trimester screening for trisomy 21 in 75 821 pregnancies: Results and estimation of the potential impact of individual risk-orientated two-stage first-trimester screening
-
Nicolaides KH, Spencer K, Avgidou K, Faiola S, Falcon O. Multicenter study of first-trimester screening for trisomy 21 in 75 821 pregnancies: results and estimation of the potential impact of individual risk-orientated two-stage first-trimester screening. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005;25:221-6.
-
(2005)
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
, vol.25
, pp. 221-226
-
-
Nicolaides, K.H.1
Spencer, K.2
Avgidou, K.3
Faiola, S.4
Falcon, O.5
-
19
-
-
34548450638
-
First- and second trimester screening: Detection of aneuploidies other than Down syndrome
-
Breathnach FM, Malone FD, Lambert-Messerlian G, Cuckle HS, Porter TF, Nyberg DA. First- and second trimester screening: detection of aneuploidies other than Down syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110:651-7.
-
(2007)
Obstet Gynecol
, vol.110
, pp. 651-657
-
-
Breathnach, F.M.1
Malone, F.D.2
Lambert-Messerlian, G.3
Cuckle, H.S.4
Porter, T.F.5
Nyberg, D.A.6
-
20
-
-
33845942655
-
ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 77: Screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities
-
ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins
-
ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 77: screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:217-27.
-
(2007)
Obstet Gynecol
, vol.109
, pp. 217-227
-
-
|