Ground motion and probabilistic hazard

Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 575-589

  Musson, R M W ^a  

^a BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Attenuation; Distance; Magnitude; Seismic hazard; Strong ground motion

Indexed keywords

ATTENUATION; DISTANCE; MAGNITUDE; SEISMIC HAZARD; STRONG GROUND MOTION;

APPROXIMATION THEORY; EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMOLOGY;

HAZARDS;

ANNUAL REVIEW; DATA ACQUISITION; EARTHQUAKE PREDICTION; GROUND MOTION; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; NUMERICAL MODEL; PARAMETERIZATION; PROBABILITY; SEISMIC HAZARD;

EID: 67651024495     PISSN: 1570761X     EISSN: 15731456     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-009-9108-7     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Abrahamson NA (2006) Seismic hazard assessment: problems with current practice and future developments. First European conference on earthquake engineering and seismology. Geneva, Paper K2
2. S Akkar JJ Bommer 2007 Empirical prediction equations for peak ground velocity derived from strong-motion records from Europe and the middle east Bull Seismol Soc Am 97 511 530 10.1785/0120060141
3. NN Ambraseys 1995 The prediction of earthquake peak ground acceleration in Europe Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 24 467 490 10.1002/eqe.4290240402 (Pubitemid 26465010)
4. NN Ambraseys JJ Bommer 1991 The attenuation of ground accelerations in Europe Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 20 1179 1202 10.1002/eqe.4290201207
5. NN Ambraseys KA Simpson JJ Bommer 1996 Prediction of horizontal response spectra in Europe Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 25 371 400 10.1002/(SICI)1096- 9845(199604)25:4<371::AID-EQE550>3.0.CO;2-A
6. NN Ambraseys J Douglas SK Sarma P Smit 2005 Equations for the estimation of strong ground motions from shallow crustal earthquakes using data from Europe and the Middle East: horizontal peak ground acceleration and spectral acceleration Bull Earthq Eng 3 1 53 10.1007/s10518-005-0183-0
7. Benjamin JR (1989) Lower-bound magnitude for probabilistic seismic hazard assessment. EPRI, EPRI NP-6496 Project 2556-25, Mountain View
8. Bommer JJ, Scherbaum F (2005) Capturing and limiting ground motion uncertainty in seismic hazard assessment. In: Gulkan P, Anderson JG (eds) Future directions of strong motion instrumentation. Kluwer, Hingham, pp 25-40
9. JJ Bommer PJ Stafford JE Alarcón S Akkar 2007 The influence of magnitude range on empirical ground-motion prediction Bull Seismol Soc Am 97 2152 2170 10.1785/0120070081
10. JN Brune 1999 Precarious rocks along the Mojave section of the San Andreas fault, California: constraints on ground motion from great earthquakes Seismol Res Lett 70 29 33
11. Campbell KW, Bozorgnia Y (2007) Campbell-Bozorgnia NGA empirical ground motion model for the geometric mean horizontal component of peak and spectral ground motion parameters. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley
12. KW Campbell Y Bozorgnia 2008 NGA ground motion model for the geometric mean horizontal component of PGA, PGV, PGD and 5% damped linear elastic response spectra for periods ranging from 0.01 to 10 s Earthq Spectra 24 139 172 10.1193/1.2857546
13. B Chiou R Darragh N Gregor WJ Silva 2008 NGA project strong-motion database Earthq Spectra 24 23 44 10.1193/1.2894831
14. CH Cramer 2006 An assessment of the impact of the 2003 EPRI ground-motion prediction models on the USGS national seismic-hazard maps Bull Seismol Soc Am 96 1159 1169 10.1785/0120050079
15. J Douglas 2003 Earthquake ground motion estimation using strong-motion records: a review of equations for the estimation of peak ground acceleration and response spectral ordinates Earth Sci Rev 61 43 104 10.1016/S0012-8252(02) 00112-5
16. AM Lombardi A Akinci L Malagnini CS Mueller 2005 Uncertainty analysis for seismic hazard in northern and central Italy Ann Geophys 48 853 866
17. RMW Musson 1999 Determination of design earthquakes in seismic hazard analysis through Monte Carlo simulation J Earthq Eng 3 463 474 10.1142/S1363246999000193
18. RMW Musson D Long JW Pappin ZA Lubkowski E Booth 1997 UK continental shelf seismic hazard Norwich Health Saf Exec OTH 93 416
19. Musson RMW, Sargeant SL (2007) Eurocode 8 seismic hazard zoning maps for the UK. British Geological Survey Technical Report, CR/07/125
20. Power M, Chiou B, Abrahamson NA, Roblee C (2006) The next generation of ground motion attenuation models (NGA) project: an overview. Proceedings of the 8th US National conference on earthquake engineering. Paper no 2022
21. M Power B Chiou NA Abrahamson Y Bozorgnia T Shantz C Roblee 2008 An overview of the NGA project Earthq Spectra 24 3 22 10.1193/1.2894833
22. K Sadigh C-Y Chang JA Egan F Makdisi RR Youngs 1997 Attenuation relationships for shallow crustal earthquakes based on California strong motion data Seismol Res Lett 68 180 189
23. PJ Stafford FO Strasser JJ Bommer 2008 An evaluation of the applicability of the NGA models to ground-motion prediction in the Euro-Mediterranean region Bull Earthq Eng 6 149 177 10.1007/s10518-007-9053-2
24. RR Youngs NA Abrahamson F Makdisi K Sadigh 1995 Magnitude dependent variance of peak ground acceleration Bull Seismol Soc Am 85 1161 1176 (Pubitemid 26457702)