Breaking the seals: Efficient mRNA detection from human archival paraffin-embedded tissue

RNA

Volumn 15, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 1588-1596

  Illig, Romana ^a   Fritsch, Helga ^a   Schwarzer, Christoph ^a  

^a INNSBRUCK MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

Author keywords

Chromogenic mRNA detection; Embryonic development; Hindgut; Human ontogeny; Target retrieval; Tumor

Indexed keywords

MESSENGER RNA; PARAFFIN; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR CDX2; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR HOXA13; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR HOXD12; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR HOXD13; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ABDOMEN; ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER TISSUE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO; EMBRYONAL TISSUE; FLUORESCENCE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; LIMB; MECHANICAL PROBE; PELVIS FLOOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; RECTUM; ROOM TEMPERATURE; STAINING;

ADULT; ANTISENSE ELEMENTS (GENETICS); BASE SEQUENCE; EMBRYO, MAMMALIAN; GENE EXPRESSION; GENES, HOMEOBOX; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEINS; HUMANS; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; PARAFFIN EMBEDDING; RECTUM; RNA, MESSENGER; TIME FACTORS; TISSUE FIXATION; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS;

EID: 67651002699     PISSN: 13558382     EISSN: 14699001     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1261/rna.1278109     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Beck F. 2002. Homeobox genes in gut development. Gut 51: 450-454.
2. Blumer MJ, Schwarzer C, Perez MT, Konakci KZ, Fritsch H. 2006. Identification and location of bone-forming cells within cartilage canals on their course into the secondary ossification centre. J Anat 208: 695-707.
3. Breitschopf H, Suchanek G, Gould RM, Colman DR, Lassmann H. 1992. In situ hybridization with digoxigenin-labeled probes: Sensitive and reliable detection method applied to myelinating rat brain. Acta Neuropathol 84: 581-587.
4. Capodieci P, Donovan M, Buchinsky H, Jeffers Y, Cordon-Cardo C, Gerald W, Edelson J, Shenoy SM, Singer RH. 2005. Gene expression profiling in single cells within tissue. Nat Methods 2: 663-665.
5. de Santa Barbara P, Roberts DJ. 2002. Tail gut endoderm and gut/ genitourinary/tail development: A new tissue-specific role for Hoxa13. Development 129: 551-561.
6. Dolle P, Dierich A, LeMeur M, Schimmang T, Schuhbaur B, Chambon P, Duboule D. 1993a. Disruption of the Hoxd-13 gene induces localized heterochrony leading to mice with neotenic limbs. Cell 75: 431-441.
7. Dolle P, Izpisua-Belmonte JC, Brown J, Tickle C, Duboule D. 1993b. Hox genes and the morphogenesis of the vertebrate limb. Prog Clin Biol Res 383A: 11-20.
8. Duboule D. 1994. How to make a limb? Science 266: 575-576.
9. Gehring WJ. 1987. Homeoboxes in the study of development. Science 236: 1245-1252.
10. Grier DG, Thompson A, Kwasniewska A, McGonigle GJ, Halliday HL, Lappin TR. 2005. The pathophysiology of HOX genes and their role in cancer. J Pathol 205: 154-171.
11. Johnson F. 1914. The development of the rectum in the human embryo. Am J Anat 16: 1-57.
12. Kluth D, Hillen M, Lambrecht W. 1995. The principles of normal and abnormal hindgut development. J Pediatr Surg 30: 1143-1147.
13. Kondo T, Dolle P, Zakany J, Duboule D. 1996. Function of posterior HoxD genes in the morphogenesis of the anal sphincter. Development 122: 2651-2659.
14. Krumlauf R. 1994. Hox genes in vertebrate development. Cell 78: 191-201.
15. Lewis EB. 1978. A gene complex controlling segmentation in Drosophila. Nature 276: 565-570.
16. Li MK, Folpe AL. 2004. CDX-2, a new marker for adenocarcinoma of gastrointestinal origin. Adv Anat Pathol 11: 101-105.
17. Mark M, Rijli FM, Chambon P. 1997. Homeobox genes in embryogenesis and pathogenesis. Pediatr Res 42: 421-429.
18. Roberts DJ, Johnson RL, Burke AC, Nelson CE, Morgan BA, Tabin C. 1995. Sonic hedgehog is an endodermal signal inducing Bmp-4 and Hox genes during induction and regionalization of the chick hindgut. Development 121: 3163-3174.
19. Roberts DJ, SmithDM,Goff DJ, Tabin CJ. 1998. Epithelial-mesenchymal signaling during the regionalization of the chick gut. Development 125: 2791-2801.
20. Samuel S, Naora H. 2005. Homeobox gene expression in cancer: Insights from developmental regulation and deregulation. Eur J Cancer 41: 2428-2437.
21. Spurr AR. 1969. A low-viscosity epoxy resin embedding medium for electron microscopy. J Ultrastruct Res 26: 31-43.
22. Warot X, Fromental-Ramain C, Fraulob V, Chambon P, Dolle P. 1997. Gene dosage-dependent effects of the Hoxa-13and Hoxd-13 mutations on morphogenesis of the terminal parts of the digestive and urogenital tracts. Development 124: 4781-4791.
23. Yahagi N, Kosaki R, Ito T, Mitsuhashi T, Shimada H, Tomita M, Takahashi T, Kosaki K. 2004. Position-specific expression of Hox genes along the gastrointestinal tract. Congenit Anom (Kyoto) 44: 18-26.
24. Yokouchi Y, Nakazato S, Yamamoto M, Goto Y, Kameda T, Iba H, Kuroiwa A. 1995. Misexpression of Hoxa-13 induces cartilage homeotic transformation and changes cell adhesiveness in chick limb buds. Genes & Dev 9: 2509-2522.
25. Zakany J, Gerard M, Favier B, Potter SS, Duboule D. 1996. Functional equivalence and rescue among group 11 Hox gene products in vertebral patterning. Dev Biol 176: 325-328.
26. Zakany J, Fromental-Ramain C, Warot X, Duboule D. 1997. Regulation of number and size of digits by posterior Hox genes: A dosedependent mechanism with potential evolutionary implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci 94: 13695-13700.