Manipulation of flowering time: Phenological integration and maternal effects

Ecology

Volumn 90, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 2139-2148

  Galloway, Laura F ^a   Burgess, Kevin S ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^b University System of Georgia   (United States)

Author keywords

Campanulastrum americanum; Flowering time; Indirect genetic effects; Life history evolution; Maternal effects; Phenotypic integration; Phenotypic manipulation; Reproductive phenology

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; ANNUAL VARIATION; CLIMATE CHANGE; FLOWERING; GROWTH RATE; MATERNAL EFFECT; PHENOLOGY; POPULATION ECOLOGY; REPRODUCTIVE BEHAVIOR; REPRODUCTIVE CYCLE; SEED DISPERSAL;

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; CAMPANULACEAE; ECOSYSTEM; FLOWER; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTION; TIME;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; CAMPANULACEAE; ECOSYSTEM; FLOWERS; REPRODUCTION; TIME FACTORS;

CAMPANULASTRUM AMERICANUM; MAGNOLIOPHYTA;

EID: 67651001119     PISSN: 00129658     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1890/08-0948.1     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Arathi, H. S., and J. K. Kelly. 2004. Corolla morphology facilitates both autogamy and bumblebee pollination in Mimulus guttatus. International Journal of Plant Sciences 165:1039-1045.
2. Baskin, J. M., and C. C. Baskin. 1984. The ecological life cycle of Campanula americana in northcentral Kentucky. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 111:329-337.
3. Bishop, J. G., and D. W. Schemske. 1998. Variation in flowering phenology and its consequences for lupines colonizing Mount St. Helens. Ecology 79:534-546.
4. Bradley, N. L., A. C. Leopold, J. Ross, and W. Huffaker. 1999. Phenological changes reflect climate change in Wisconsin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 96: 9701-9704.
5. Brody, A. K. 1997. Effects of pollinators, herbivores, and seed predators on flowering phenology. Ecology 78:1624-1631.
6. Burgess, K. S., J. R. Etterson, and L. F. Galloway. 2007. Artificial selection shifts flowering phenology and other correlated traits in an autotetraploid herb. Heredity 99: 641-648.
7. Conner, J. K., and D. L. Hartl. 2004. A primer of ecological genetics. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
8. Donohue, K. 1999. Seed dispersal as a maternally influenced character: mechanistic basis of maternal effects and selection on maternal characters in an annual plant. American Naturalist 154:674-689.
9. Donohue, K., L. Dorn, C. Griffith, E. Kim, A. Aguilera, C. R. Polisetty, and J. Schmitt. 2005. Environmental and genetic influences on the germination of Arabidopsis thaliana in the field. Evolution 59:740-757.
10. Dunne, J. A., J. Harte, and K. J. Taylor. 2003. Subalpine meadow flowering phenology responses to climate change: integrating experimental and gradient methods. Ecological Monographs 73:69-86.
11. Evanhoe, L., and L. F. Galloway. 2002. Floral longevity in Campanula americana (Campanulaceae): a comparison of morphological and functional gender phases. American Journal of Botany 89:587-591.
12. Fitter, A. H., and R. S. R. Fitter. 2002. Rapid changes in flowering time in British plants. Science 296:1689-1691.
13. Galloway, L. F. 2001. Parental environmental effects on life history in the herbaceous plant Campanula americana. Ecology 82:2781-2789.
14. Galloway, L. F. 2002. The effect of maternal phenology on offspring life history in the herbaceous plant Campanula americana. Journal of Ecology 90:851-858.
15. Galloway, L. F., T. Cirigliano, and K. Gremski. 2002. The contribution of display size and dichogamy to potential geitonogamy in Campanula americana. International Journal of Plant Sciences 163:133-139.
16. Galloway, L. F., and J. R. Etterson. 2007. Transgenerational plasticity is adaptive in the wild. Science 318:1134-1136.
17. Galloway, L. F., J. R. Etterson, and J. L. Hamrick. 2003. Outcrossing rates and inbreeding depression in the herbaceous autotetraploid Campanula americana. Heredity 90:308-315.
18. Giménez-Benavides, L., A. Escudero, and J. M. Iriondo. 2007. Reproductive limits of a late-flowering high-mountain Mediterranean plant along an elevational climate gradient. New Phytologist 173:367-382.
19. Griffith, T., and M. A. Watson. 2006. Is evolution necessary for range expansion? Manipulating reproductive timing of a weedy annual transplanted beyond its range. American Naturalist 167:153-164.
20. Haggerty, B. P. 2006. Responses to growing season length in the American bellflower, Campanulastrum americanum: implications for climate change. Thesis. University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
21. Kilkenny, F. F., and L. F. Galloway. 2008. Reproductive success in varying light environments: direct and indirect effects of light on plants and pollinators. Oecologia 155:247-255.
22. Kirkpatrick, M., and R. Lande. 1989. The evolution of maternal characters. Evolution 43:485-503.
23. Lacey, E. P., and R. Pace. 1983. Effect of parental flowering and dispersal times on offspring fate in Daucus carota (Apiaceae). Oecologia 60:274-278.
24. Lacey, E. P., D. A. Roach, D. Herr, S. Kincaid, and R. Perrott. 2003. Multigenerational effects of flowering and fruiting phenology in Plantago lanceolata. Ecology 84:2462-2475.
25. Lenssen, J. P. M., C. Shock, T. Speek, H. J. During, and H. de Kroon. 2005. Experimental ramet aggregation in the clonal plant Agrostis stolonifera reduces its competitive ability. Ecology 86:1358-1365.
26. Nuismer, S. L., and B. M. Cunningham. 2005. Selection for phenotypic divergence between diploid and autotetraploid Heuchera grossulariifolia. Evolution 59:1928-1935.
27. Parmesan, C., and G. Yohe. 2003. A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421:37-42.
28. Peñuelas, J., I. Filella, and P. Comas. 2002. Changed plant and animal life cycles from 1952 to 2000 in the Mediterranean region. Global Change Biology 8:531-544.
29. Picó, F. X., and J. Retana. 2000. Temporal variation in the female components of reproductive success over the extended flowering season of a Mediterranean perennial herb. Oikos 89:485-492.
30. Pigliucci, M. 2003. Phenotypic integration: studying the ecology and evolution of complex phenotypes. Ecology Letters 6: 265-272.
31. Pilson, D. 2000. Herbivory and natural selection on flowering phenology in wild sunflower, Helianthus annuus. Oecologia 122:72-82.
32. Post, E. S., C. Pederson, C. C. Wilmers, and M. C. Forchhammer. 2008. Phenological sequences reveal aggregate life history response to climatic warming. Ecology 89:363-370.
33. Price, M. V., and N. M. Waser. 1998. Effects of experimental warming on plant reproductive phenology in a subalpine meadow. Ecology 79:1261-1271.
34. SAS Institute. 2005. SAS/STAT. Version 9.1.3. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA.
35. Schmitt, J., S. A. Dudley, and M. Pigliucci. 1999. Manipulative approaches to testing adaptive plasticity: phytochrome-mediated shade-avoidance responses in plants. American Naturalist 154:S43-S54.
36. Sherry, R. A., X. H. Zhou, S. L. Gu, J. A. Arnone, D. S. Schimel, P. S. Verbürg, L. L. Wallace, and Y. Q. Luo. 2007. Divergence of reproductive phenology under climate warming. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA) 104:198-202.
37. Stanton, M. L., and C. Galen. 1989. Consequences of flower heliotropism for reproduction in an alpine buttercup (Ranunculus adoneus). Oecologia 78:477-485.
38. Wade, M. J., and S. Kalisz. 1990. The causes of natural selection. Evolution 44:1947-1955.
39. Wolf, J. B., E. D. Brodie III, J. M. Cheverud, A. J. Moore, and M. J. Wade. 1998. Evolutionary consequences of indirect genetic effects. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 13:64-69.