Agent-based modeling within a dynamic network

Chaos and Complexity in Psychology: The Theory of Nonlinear Dynamical Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 475-505

  Frantz, Terrill L ^a   Carley, Kathleen M ^a  

^a Carnegie Mellon University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 67650995509     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139058544.017     Document Type: Chapter

References (151)

1. Albert, R., Jeong, H., & Barabási, A. (2000). Error and attack tolerance of complex networks, Nature, 406, 378–482.
2. Anghel, M., Toroczkai, Z., Bassler, K. E., & Korniss, G. (2004). Competition in social networks: Emergence of a scale-free leadership structure and collective efficiency. Physical Review Letters, 92, 058701–068704.
3. Arthur, W. B. (1994). Inductive reasoning and bounded rationality. The American Economic Review, 84, 406–411.
4. Ashworth, M., & Carley, K. M. (2004, June). Toward unified organization theory: Perspec-tivesonthe state of computational modeling. Paper presented to the North American Association for Computational Social and Organization Science 2004 Conference, Pittsburgh, PA.
5. Ashworth, M., & Carley, K. M. (2007). Can tools help unify organization theory? Perspectives on the state of computational modeling. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory,13, 89–111.
6. Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York:BasicBooks.
7. Axelrod, R. M. (1987). The evolution of strategies in the iterated prisoner’s dilemma. In W. Davis (Ed.), Genetic algorithms and simulated annealing(pp. 32–41). London: Pitman.
8. Axelrod, R. M. (1997). Advancing the art of simulation in the social sciences. In R. Conte, R. Hegselmann, & P. Terna (Eds.), Simulating social phenomena(pp. 21–40). Berlin: Springer Publishing Company.
9. Axelrod, R. M. (2006). Agent-based modeling as a bridge between disciplines. In Leigh Tesfatsion & Kenneth L. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of computational economics, Vol. 2: Agent-based computational economics(pp. 1565–1584). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
10. Axelrod, R. M., & Dion, D. (1988). The further evolution of cooperation. Science, 242, 1385–1390.
11. Axelrod, R. M., & Tesfatsion, L. (2006). Guide for newcomers to agent-based modelingin the social sciences. In Leigh Tesfatsion & Kenneth L. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of computational economics, Vol. 2: Agent-based computational economics, pp. 1647–1659. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
12. Axelrod, R. M., & Tesfatsion, L. (2007). On-line guide for newcomers to agent-based modeling in the social sciences. Retrieved February 3, 2008, from http://www.econ.iastate.edu/tesfatsi/abmread.htm
13. Axtell, R. (2000). Why agents? On the varied motivations for agent computing in the social sciences. Center on Social and Economic Dynamics, Working Paper No. 17. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
14. Bankes, S. (2002). Agent-based modeling: A revolution? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(Suppl. 3), 7199–7200.
15. Barabasi, A.-L. (2003). Linked: How everything is connected to everything else and what it means. New York:Plume.
16. Barabasi, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286, 509–512.
17. Blau, P. M. (1970). A formal theory of differentiation in organizations. American Sociological Review,35, 201–218.
18. Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
19. Borgatti, S., Everett, M., & Freeman, L. C. (1992). UCINET IV, Version 1.0. Columbia, MD: Analytic Technologies.
20. Bowen, D. D. (1987). Developing a personal theory of experiential learning: A dispatch from the trenches. Simulation & Gaming, 18, 192–206.
21. Burt, R. S. (1973). The differential impact of social integration on participation in the diffusion of innovations. Social Science Research, 2, 125–144.
22. Burt, R. S. (1976). Positions in networks. Social Forces, 55, 93–122.
23. Burt, R. S. (1980). Innovation as a structural interest: Rethinking the impact of network position in innovation adoption. Social Networks, 4, 337–355.
24. Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25. Burt, R. S., & Cook, K. (Eds.). (2001). Social capital: Theory and research. New York: Aldine.
26. Burton, R. (1998). Validating and docking: An overview, summary and challenge. In M.Prietula, K. Carley, & L. Gasser (Eds.), Simulating organizations: Computational models of institutions and groups(pp. 215–228). Cambridge, MA: American Association for Artificial Intelligence/MIT Press.
27. Carley, K. M. (1986). An approach for relating social structure to cognitive structure. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 12, 137–189.
28. Carley, K. M. (1990). Group stability: Socio-cognitive approach. In A. E. Lawler, B. Markovsky, C. Ridgeway, & H. Walker (Eds.), Advances in group processes, Vol. 7(pp. 1–44). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
29. Carley, K. M. (1991a). A theory of group stability. American Sociological Review, 56, 331–354.
30. Carley, K. M. (1991b). Designing organizational structures to cope with communication breakdowns: A simulation model. Industrial Crisis Quarterly, 5, 19–57.
31. Carley, K. M. (1992). Organizational learning and personnel turnover. Organizational Science, 3, 2–46.
32. Carley, K. M. (1995a). Computational and mathematical organization theory: Perspective and directions. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 1, 39–56.
33. Carley, K. M. (1995b). Communication technologies and their effect on cultural homogeneity, consensus, and the diffusion of new ideas. Sociological Perspectives, 38, 547–571.
34. Carley, K. M. (1999). On the evolution of social and organizational networks. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 16, 3–30.
35. Carley, K. M. (2002). Smart agents and organizations of the future. In L. A. Lievrouw & S. Livingstone (Eds.), The handbook of new media, social shaping and consequences of ICTS(pp. 206–220). London: Sage.
36. Carley, K. M. (2003). Dynamics network analysis. In R. Breiger, K. Carley, & P. Pattison (Eds.), Dynamic social network modelling and analysis: Workshop summary and papers(pp. 133–145). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
37. Carley, K. M., Columbus, D., DeReno, M., Reminga, J., & Moon, I. (2007). ORA user’s guide 2007 (Technical Report, CMU-ISRI-07–115). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University, School of Computer Science, Institute for Software Research.
38. Carley, K. M., & Hill, V. (2001). Structural change and learning within organizations. In A. Lomi & E. R. Larsen (Eds.), Dynamics of organizations: Computational modeling and organizational theories(pp. 63–92). Menlo Park: MIT Press.
39. Carley, K. M., & Newell, A. (1994). The nature of the social agent. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 19, 221–262.
40. Carley, K. M., & Palmquist, M. (1992). Extracting, representing and analyzing mental models. Social Forces, 70, 601–636.
41. Carley, K. M., & Prietula, M. J. (1994a). ACTS theory: Extending the model of bounded rationality. In K. M. Carley & M. J. Prietula (Eds.), Computational organization theory(pp. 55–88). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. Carley, K. M., & Reminga, J. (2004). ORA: Organization risk analyzer (Technical Report CMU-ISRI-04-106). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University, School of Computer Science, Institute for Software Research International.
43. Carley, K. M., Reminga, J., & Kamneva, N. (2003, June). Destabilizing terrorist networks. Paper presented to the NAACSOS conference, Pittsburgh, PA.
44. Carley, K. M., & Ren, Y. (2001). Tradeoffs netween performance and adaptability for C3I architectures. Working Paper, Center for Computational Analysis of Social and Organizational Systems. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University.
45. Carley, K. M., & Svoboda, D. (1996). Modeling organizational adaptation as a simulated annealing process. Sociological Methods Research, 25, 138–168.
46. Carley, K. M., & Wendt, K. (1991). Electronic mail and scientific communication: A study of the soar extended research group. Knowledge Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 12, 406–440.
47. Center for Computational Analysis of Social and Organizational Systems (2008). Retrieved February 3, 2008 from http://www.casos.cs.cmu.edu
48. Chang, M. H., & Harrington, J. (2006). Agent-based models of organizations. In LeighTesfatsion & Kenneth L. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of computational economics, Vol. 2(pp. 1274–1337). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
49. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.
50. Crowston, K. (1994). Evolving novel organizational forms. In K. M. Carley & M. J. Prietula (Eds.), Computational Organization Theory(pp. 19–38). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
51. Crowston, K. (1998). An approach to evolving novel organizational forms. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 2, 29–47.
52. Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Oxford: Blackwell.
53. Dal Forno, A., & Merlone, U. (2004). Personnel turnover in organizations: An agent-based simulation model. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 8, 205–230.
54. Dal Forno, A., & Merlone, U. (2006). The emergence of effective leaders: An experimental and computational approach. Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 8(4), 36–51.
55. Davis, J. P., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Bingham, C. B. (2007). Developing theory through simulation methods. Academy of Management Review, 32, 480–499.
56. Davis, M. S. (1973). Intimate relations. New York: Free Press.
57. Dawson, R. E. (1962). Simulation in the social sciences. In H. S. Guetzkow (Ed.), Simulation in social science: Readings(pp. 1–15). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
58. DiMaggio, P. J. (1986). Structural analysis of organizational fields: A block model approach. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 35–370.
59. Dooley, K. (2002). Simulation research methods. In J. Baum (Ed.), Companion to organizations(pp. 829–848). London: Blackwell.
60. Dooley, K., & Corman, S. (2002). Agent-based, genetic, and emergent computational models of complex systems. In L. D. Kiel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of life support systems (EOLSS). Oxford, UK: UNESCO/EOLSS.
61. Dooley, K., & Corman, S. (2004). Dynamic analysis of new streams: Institutional versus environmental effects. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 8, 403–428.
62. Dooley, K. J., Corman, S. R., McPhee, R. D., & Kuhn, T. (2003). Modeling high-resolution broadband discourse in complex adaptive systems. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 7, 61–86.
63. Elliott, E., & Kiel, L. D. (2004). Agent-based modeling in the social and behavioral sciences. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 8, 121–130.
64. Epstein, J. M. (1999). Agent-based computational models and generative social science. Complexity, 4, 41–60.
65. Epstein, J. M., & Axtell, R. (1996). Growing artificial societies: Social science from the bottom up. Cambridge: MIT Press.
66. Faloutsos, M., Faloutsos, P., & Faloutsos, C. (1999). On power-law relationships of the Internet topology. Proceedings of the conference on applications, technoloiges, architectures and protocols for computer simulation, SIGCOMM(pp. 251–262). New York: Association for Computing Machines.
67. Forrester, J. (1958). Industrial dynamics: A major breakthrough for decision makers. Harvard Business Review, 36, 37–66.
68. Forrester, J. (1969) Urban dynamics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
69. Freeman, L. C. (2004). The development of social network analysis. Vancouver: Empirical Press.
70. Galbraith, J. R. (1973). Designing complex organizations. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
71. Galbraith, J. R. (1977). Organization design. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
72. Gardner, M. (1970). Mathematical games: The fantastic combinations of John Conway’s new solitaire game “Life.” Scientific American, 223, 120–123.
73. Garfield, E. (1955). Citation indexes for science. Science, 122(3159), 108–111.
74. Gilbert, N. (1996). Simulation as a research strategy. In K. G. Troitzsch, U. Mueller, G. N. Gilbert, & J. E. Doran (Eds.), Social Science Microsimulation(pp. 448–454). Berlin: Springer Publishing Company.
75. Gladwell, M. (1999, January 11). Six degrees of Lois Weisberg. The New Yorker, 52–63.
76. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.
77. Granovetter, M. S. (1974). Getting a job: A study of contacts and careers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
78. Guastello, S. J. (2002). Managing emergent phenomena: Nonlinear dynamics in work organizations. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
79. Harary, F., & Norman, R. Z. (1953). Graph theory as a mathematical model in social science. Research Center for Group Dynamics, Monograph No. 2. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
80. Harrison, J. R., Lin, Z., Carroll, G. R., & Carley, K. M. (2007). Simulation modeling in organizational and management research. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1229–1245.
81. Hazy, J. K. (2007). Computer models of leadership: Foundations for a new discipline or meaningless diversion? The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 391–410.
82. Hazy, J. K. (2008). Toward a theory of leadership in complex systems: Computational modeling explorations. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 12, 281–310.
83. Henrickson, L. (2004). Trends in complexity and computation in the social sciences. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 8, 279–302.
84. Hirshman, B. R., Carley, K. M., & Kowalchuck, M. J. (2007). Specifying agents in Construct (Technical Report, CMU-ISRI-07-107). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University, School ofComputer Science, Institute for Software Research.
85. Holland, J. H. (1975). Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. Ann Arbor: Universityof Michigan Press.
86. Holland, J. H. (1995). Hidden order: How adaptation builds complexity. Cambridge: Perseus.
87. Holland, J. H., & Miller, J. (1991). Artificial adaptive agents in economic theory. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 81, 365–370.
88. Homans, G. C. (1950). The human group. NY: Harcourt.
89. Hubler, A., & Pines, D. (1994). Prediction and adaptation in an evolving chaotic environment. In G. Cowan, D. Pines & D. Meltzer (Eds.), Complexity: Metaphors, models and reality, Vol. XIX(pp. 343–382). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
90. International Network for Social Network Analysis (2007). Homepage. Retrieved February 3, 2008 from http://www.insna.org
91. Iwanaga, S., & Namatame, A. (2002). The complexity of collective decision. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 6, 137–158.
92. Kaizoji, T. (2002). Speculative price dynamics in a heterogeneous agent model. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 6, 217–229.
93. Keller-McNulty, S., Bellman, K. L., Carley, K. M., Davis, P. K., Ivanetich, R., et al. (2006) Defense modeling, simulation, and analysis: Meeting the challenge. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
94. Keys, J. B., & Bell, R. R. (1977). A comparative evaluation of the management of learning grid applied to the business policy learning environment. Journal of Management, 3, 33–39.
95. Keys, J. B., & Wolfe, J. (1990). The role of management games and simulations in education and research. Journal of Management, 16, 307–336.
96. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
97. Krackhardt, D. (1987). Cognitive social structures. Social Networks, 9, 109–134.
98. Krackhardt, D. (1990). Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition, and power in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 342–369.
99. Krackhardt, D. (1991). The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. In N. Nohira & R. Eccles (Eds.), Organizations and networks: Theory and practice(pp. 216–239). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
100. Krackhardt, D., & Brass, D. (1994). Intra-organizational networks: The micro side. In S. Wasserman & J. Galaskiewicz (Eds.), Advances in the social and behavioral sciences from social network analysis(pp. 209–230). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
101. Krackhardt, D., & Carley, K. M. (1998). A PCANS model of structure in organization. In Proceedings of the 1998 International Symposium on Command and Control Research and Technology (June 1998), Monterrey, CA(pp. 113–119). Vienna, VA: Evidence Based Research.
102. Krackhardt, D., & Porter, L. W. (1985). When friends leave: A structural analysis of the relationship between turnover and stayers’ attitudes. Administrative Science Quarterly,30, 242–261.
103. Krackhardt, D., & Porter, L. W. (1986). The snowball effect: Turnover embedded in communication networks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 50–55.
104. LeBon, G. (1897/1998). The crowd. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
105. Lee, J.-S., & Carley, K. M. (2004). OrgAhead: A computational model of organizational learning and decision making (Technical Report CMU-ISRI-04–117). Carnegie Mellon University, School of Computer Science, Institute for Software Research International.
106. Lin, Z., & Carley, K. M. (1998). Organizational response: The cost performance tradeoff. Management Science, 43, 217–234.
107. March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.
108. Marschak, J. (1955). Elements for a theory of teams. Management Science, 1, 127–137.
109. Masuch, M., & Warglien, M. (1992). Artificial intelligence in organization and management theory. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
110. McGuire C. B., & Radner, R. (1986). Decision and organization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
111. Mihavics, K., & Ouksel, A. M. (1996). Learning to align organizational design and data. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 1, 143–155.
112. Milgram, S. (1967). The small-world problem. Psychology Today, 1, 60–67.
113. Minar, N., Burkhart, R., Langton, C., & Askenazi, M. (1996). The Swarm simulation system: A toolkit for building multi-agent simulations. Working papers No. 96-06-042. Sante Fe: Santa Fe Institute.
114. Moreno, J. (1934). Who shall survive?Washington, DC: Nervous and Mental Disease Publishing.
115. Moreno, J., & Jennings, H. H. (1938). Statistics of social configurations. Sociometry, 1, 342–374.
116. Nohria, N., & Eccles, R. (1992). Networks and organizations: structure, form, and action. Boston: Harvard Business Press.
117. Ostrom, T. (1988). Computer simulation: The third symbol system. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 381–392.
118. Padgett, J. F. (1997). The emergence of simple ecologies of skill. In B. Arthur, S. Durlauf, & D. Lane (Eds.), The economy as a complex evolving system, II(pp. 199–222). Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.
119. Pool, I. S., & Kochen, M. (1978). Contacts and influence. Social Networks, 1, 5–51.
120. Prietula, M. J., & Carley, K. M. (1994). Computational organization theory: Autonomous agents and emergent behavior. Journal of Organizational Computing, 4, 41–83.
121. Radner, R. (1993). The organization of decentralized information processing. Econometrica, 6, 1109–1146.
122. Repenning, N. P. (2002). A simulation-based approach to understanding the dynamics of innovation implementation. Organization Science, 14, 109–127.
123. Reynolds, C. (1987). Flocks, herds, and schools: A distributed behavioral model. Computer Graphics, 21, 25–34.
124. Rice, R. E., & Aydin, C. (1991). Attitudes toward new organizational technology: Network proximity as a mechanism for social information processing. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2, 219–244.
125. Robinson, S. (1997). Simulation model verification and validation: Increasing the users’ confidence. In S. Andradcttir, K.J.Healy, D. H. Withers, & B. L. Nelson (Eds.), Proceeding of the 1997 Winter Simulation Conference(pp. 53–59). San Diego, CA: Society for Computer Simulation.
126. Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information professing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 224–253.
127. Sastry, M. A. (1997). Problems and paradoxes in a model of punctuated organizational change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 237–275.
128. Schelling, T. (1971). Dynamic models of segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1, 143–186.
129. Schreiber, C. (2006). Human and organizational risk modeling: Critical personnel and leadership in network organizations (Technical Report CMU-ISRI-06-120). Carnegie Mellon University, School of Computer Science, Institute for Software Research International.
130. Schreiber, C., & Carley, K. M. (2004a). Key personnel: Identification and assessment of turnover risk. CASOS working paper. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University.
131. Schreiber, C., & Carley, K. M. (2004b). Construct – A multi-agent network model for the co-evolution of agents and socio-cultural environments (Technical Report CMU-ISRI-04-109). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University, School of Computer Science, Institute for Software Research International.
132. Schreiber, C., & Carley, K. M. (2005). Ineffective organizational practices at NASA: A dynamic network analysis (Technical Report, CMU-ISRI-05-135). Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University, School of Computer Science, Institute for Software Research International.
133. Schreiber, C., & Carley, K. M. (2007, March). Agent interactions in construct: An empirical validation using calibrated grounding. Paper presented to the 2007 BRIMS Behavior Representation in Modeling Simulation Conference, Norfolk, VA.
134. Schultz, R., & Sullivan, E. M. (1972). Developments in simulation in social and adminis-trativescience. In H. S. Guetzkow, P. Kotler, & R. L. Schultz (Eds.), Simulation in social and administrative science; overviews and case-examples(pp. 3–47). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
135. Shoham, Y., & Tennenholtz, M. (1994). Co-learning and the evolution of social activity (Technical Report No. STAN-CS-TR-94-1511). Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Department of Computer Science.
136. Simmel, G. (1908/1971). On individuality and social forms. Chicago:University of Chicago.
137. Simon, H. A. (1945). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization. New York: Macmillan.
138. Simon, H. A. (1952). A formal theory of interaction in social groups. American Sociological Review, 17, 202–211.
139. Simon, H. A. (1957). Models of man: Social and rational; Mathematical essays on rational human behavior in a social setting. New York: Wiley.
140. Simon, H. A. (1962). The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106, 467–482.
141. Simon, H. A. (1969). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
142. Simon, H. A., & Guetzkow, H. (1955). A model of short- and long-run mechanisms involved in pressures toward uniformity in groups. Psychological Review, 62, 56–68.
143. Society for Chaos Theory in Psychology & Life Sciences. (2008). Chaos and complexity resources for students and teachers. Retrieved February 3, 2008, from http://www.societyforchaostheory.org/tutorials/
144. Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic interactionism: A social structure version. MenloPark, CA: Benjamin/Cummings Publishing.
145. Verhagen, H., & Masuch, M. (1994). TASCCS: A synthesis of double-AISS and plural-SOAR. In K. M. Carley & M. J. Prietula (Eds.), Computational organization theory(pp. 39–54). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
146. Watts, D. J. (1999). Small worlds: The dynamics of networks between order and randomness. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
147. Watts, D. J. (2004). Six degrees: The science of a connected age. New York:Norton.
148. Wegner, D. M., Giuliano, T., & Hertel, P. (1985). Cognitive interdependence in closerelationships. InW.J.Ickes(Ed.), Compatible and incompatible relationships(pp. 253–276). New York: Springer-Verlag.
149. Wegner, D. M., Erber, R., & Raymond, P. (1991). Transactive memory in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 923–929.
150. White, H. C. (2004). Markets from networks: Socioeconomic models of production. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
151. Zipf, G. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort: An introduction to human ecology. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.