In vivo comparison of force development with various materials of implant-supported prostheses

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

Volumn 36, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 616-625

  Kim, H K ^a   Heo, S J ^b   Koak, J Y ^b   Kim, S K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Bending moment; Fibre reinforced composite; Implant prosthetic material; Strain gauged abutment; TesceraTM ATLTM

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DENTURE; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ADULT; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; FEMALE; HUMANS; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 67650912268     PISSN: 0305182X     EISSN: 13652842     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.01972.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. van Steenberghe D, Lekholm U, Bolender C, Folmer T, Henry P, Herrmann I, et al. Applicability of osseointegrated oral implants in the rehabilitation partial edentulism: a prospective multicenter study on 558 fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990 5 : 272 281.
2. Jemt T, Linden B, Lekholm U. Failures and complications in 127 consecutively placed fixed partial prostheses supported by Branemark implants: from prosthetic treatment to first annual checkup. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992 7 : 40 44.
3. Naert I, Qurynen M, van Steenberghe D, Darius P. A six year prosthodontic study of 509 consecutively inserted implants for the treatment of partial edentulism. J Prosthet Dent. 1992 7 : 236 245.
4. Pylant T, Triplette RG, Key MC, Brunsvold MA. A retrospective evaluation of endosseous titanium implants in the partially edentulous patient. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992 7 : 195 202.
5. Qurynen M, Naert I, van Steenberghe D, Dekeyser C, Callens A. Periodontal aspects of osseointegrated fixtures supporting a partial bridge. An up to 6-years retrospective study. J Clin Periodontol. 1992 19 : 118 126.
6. Henry PJ, Tolman DE, Bolender C. The applicability of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of partially edentulous patients: three-year results of a prospective multicenter study. Quintessence Int. 1993 24 : 123 129.
7. Zarb GA, Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants in anterior partially edentulous patients. Int J Prosthodont. 1993 6 : 180 188.
8. Smedberg JI, Nilner K, Rangert B, Svensson SA, Glantz SA. On the influence of superstructure connection on implant preload: a methodological and clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996 7 : 55 63. (Pubitemid 126670567)
9. Isidor F. Loss of osseointegration caused by occlusal load of oral implants. A clinical and radiographic study in monkeys. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996 7 : 143 152. (Pubitemid 126670511)
10. Barbier L, Schepers E. Adaptive bone remodeling around oral implants under axial and nonaxial loading conditions in the dog mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997 12 : 215 223. (Pubitemid 127500566)
11. Stegaroiu R, Kusakari H, Nishiyama S, Miyakawa O. Influence of prosthesis material on stress distribution in bone and implant: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998 13 : 781 790. (Pubitemid 128506100)
12. Duyck J, Van Oosterwyck H, Vander Sloten J, De Cooman M, Puers R, Naert I. Influence of prosthesis material on the loading of implant support a fixed prosthesis: in vivo study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2000 2 : 100 109.
13. Ciftci Y, Canay S. Stress distribution on the metal framework of the implant supported fixed prosthesis using different veneering materials. Int J Prosthodont. 2001 14 : 406 411. (Pubitemid 33671588)
14. Davis DM, Rimrott R, Zarb GA. Studies on frameworks for osseointegrated prostheses: Part 2. The effect of adding acrylic resin or porcelain to form the occlusal superstructure. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1988 3 : 275 280.
15. Gracis SE, Nicholls JI, Chalupnik JD, Yuodelis RA. Shock-absorbing behavior of five restorative materials used on implants. Int J Prosthodont. 1991 4 : 282 291.
16. Inan O, Kesim B. Evaluation of the effects of restorative materials used for occlusal surfaces of implant-supported prostheses on force distribution. Implant Dent. 1999 8 : 311 316.
17. Ciftci Y, Canay S. The effect of veneering materials on stress distribution implant-supported fixed prosthetic restorations. Int J Prosthodont. 2000 15 : 571 582.
18. Soumeire J, Dejou J. Shock absorbability of various restorative materials used on implants. J Oral Rehabil. 1999 26 : 394 401.
19. Mericske-Stern R, Piotti M, Sirtes G. 3-D in vivo force measurements on mandibular implants supporting overdentures. A comparative study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996 7 : 387 396. (Pubitemid 126670557)
20. Gere James M. 5th Mechanics of materials. Toronto : Brooks/Cole 2002.
21. Wang TM, Leu LJ, Wang J, Lin LD. Effects of prosthesis splinting on peri-implant bone stress around implants in poor-quality bone: a numeric analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002 17 : 231 237.
22. Johansson LA, Ekfeldt A. Implant-supported fixed prostheses: a retrospective study. Int J Prosthodont. 2003 16 : 172 176. (Pubitemid 37162372)
23. Bassit R, Lindström H, Rangert B. In vivo registration of force development with ceramic and acrylic resin occlusal materials on implant-supported prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002 17 : 17 23.
24. Pjetursson BE, Sailer I, Zwahlen M, Hämmerle CH. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part I: Single crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 18 (Suppl 3 73 85.
25. Behr M, Rosentritt M, Lang R, Handel G. Glass fiber-reinforced composite fixed partial dentures on dental implants. J Oral Rehabil. 2001 28 : 895 902. (Pubitemid 33754589)
26. Glantz PO, Rangert B, Svensson A, Stafford GD, Arnvidarson B, Randow K, et al. On clinical loading of osseointegrated implants; A methodological and clinical study. Clin Oral Implant Res. 1993 4 : 99 105.
27. Brunski JB, Hipp JA. In vivo forces on endosteal implants: a measurement system and biochemical considerations. J Prosthet Dent. 1984 51 : 82 90.
28. Morneburg TR, Proschel PA. Measurement of masticatory forces and implant loads: a methodologic clinical study. Int J Prosthodont. 2002 15 : 20 27.
29. Monaco C, Ferrari M, Miceli GP, Scotti R. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced composite inlay FPDs. Int J Prosthodont. 2003 16 : 319 325. (Pubitemid 37141326)
30. Kim H. In vitro comparison of the bending moments generated at strain-gauged abutments between implant prosthetic materials. J Kor Acad Implant Dent. 2004 42 : 14 21.
31. Hobkirk JA, Psarros KJ. The influence of occlusal surface material on peak masticatory forces using osseointegrated implant-supported prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992 7 : 345 352.