Evaluation of the Effects of Restorative Materials Used for Occlusal Surfaces of Implant-Supported Prostheses on Force Distribution

Implant Dentistry

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 311-316

  Inan, Özgür ^a   Kesim, Bülent ^a  

^a SELCUK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Dental implants; Implant supported fixed prostheses; Stress analyses

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; CHROMIUM DERIVATIVE; RESIN;

ARTICLE; BIREFRINGENCE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; HUMAN; MANDIBLE; MATERIALS TESTING; PHYSIOLOGY; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH OCCLUSION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ACRYLIC RESINS; BIREFRINGENCE; CHROMIUM ALLOYS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL MODELS; DENTAL OCCLUSION; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MANDIBLE; MATERIALS TESTING; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 0033253394     PISSN: 10566163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00008505-199903000-00017     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bidez MW, Misch CE. Force transfer in implant dentistry: Basic concepts and principles. J Oral Implantol. 1992;8: 264-274.
2. Worthington P, Brånemark PI. Advanced Osseointegration Surgery: Applications in the Maxillofacial Region. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Company; 1992.
3. Brunski JB. Biomechanical factors affecting the bone-dental implant interface. Clin Mater. 1991;10:153-201.
4. Assif D, Oren E, Marshak BL, et al. Photoelastic analysis of stress transfer by endodontically treated teeth to the supporting structure using different restorative techniques. J Prosthet Dent. 1989; 61:535-543.
5. Cibirka RM, Razzoog ME, Lang BR, et al. Determining the force absorption quotient for restorative materials used in implant occlusal surfaces. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;67:361-364.
6. Lundquist S, Carlsson GE. Maxillary fixed prostheses on osseointegrated dental implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1983; 50:262-270.
7. Skalak R. Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;49:843-848.
8. Weinberg LA. The biomechanics of force distribution in implant-supported prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993;8:19-31.
9. Kohn DH. Overview of factors important in implant design. J Oral Implantol. 1992;18:204-219.
10. Redner S. New oblique-incidence method for direct photoelastic measurements of principal strains. Exp Mechanics. 1963;3:67-72.
11. Redner S. Photoelastic coatings. Exp Mechanics. 1980;20:403-408.
12. Waskewicz GA, Ostrowski JS, Parks VJ. Photoelastic analysis of stress distribution transmitted from a fixed prostheses attached to osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994;9:405-411.
13. Thompson WD, Kratochvil FJ, Caputo AA. Evaluation of photoelastic stress patterns produced by various designs of bilateral distal-extension removable partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1977;38:261-273.
14. Kratochvil FJ, Thompson WD, Caputo AA. Photoelastic analysis of stress patterns on teeth and bone with attachment retainers for removable partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1981;46:21-28.
15. Browning JD, Jameson WE, Stewart CD, et al. Effect of positional loading of three removable partial denture clasp assemblies on movement of abutment teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1986;55: 347-351.
16. Hobo S, Ichida E, Garcia LT. Osseointegration and Occlusal Rehabilitation. Tokyo: Quintessence Publishing Company; 1990:163-186.