Procedure and guidelines for evaluation of BPM methodologies

Business Process Management Journal

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 336-357

  Filipowska, Agata ^a   Kaczmarek, Monika ^a   Kowalkiewicz, Marek ^b   Zhou, Xuan ^b   Born, Matthias ^c  

^a POZNA UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS   (Poland)

^b SAP RESEARCH   (Australia)

^c SAP RESEARCH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Business process re engineering; Process management; Strategic evaluation

Indexed keywords

EID: 67650899460     PISSN: 14637154     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/14637150910960594     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bandara, W., Indulska, M., Sadiq, S., Chong, S., Rosemann, M. and Green, P. (2007), Major issues in business process management: an expert perspective, report, School of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, The University of Queensland, 5 February.
2. Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds) (2000), Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd ed., Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
3. Fetterman, D.M. (1996), Empowerment evaluation: an introduction to theory and practice, in Fetterman, D.M., Kaftarian, S. and Wandersman, A. (Eds), Empowerment Evaluation: Knowledge and Tools for Self-assessment and Accountability, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
4. Foss Hansen, H. (2005), Choosing evaluation models: a discussion on evaluation design, Evaluation, Vol. 11, No. 4, pp. 447-62.
5. Hepp, M., Leymann, F., Domingue, J., Wahler, A. and Fensel, D. (2005), Semantic Business Process Management: A Vision Towards Using Semantic Web Services for Business Process Management, IEEE ICEBE, Beijing, 18-20 October, pp. 535-40.
6. House, E.R. (1980), Evaluating with Validity, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
7. Jane Davidson, E. (2005), Evaluation Methodology Basics: The Nuts and Bolts of Sound Evaluation, Sage, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
8. Keppel, G. (1991), Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook, 3rd ed., Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
9. Kitchenham, B. and Pfleeger, S.L. (2002), Principles of survey research: part5: populations and samples, ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, Vol. 27 No. 5, pp. 17-20.
10. Levy, P.S. and Lemeshow, S. (1999), Sampling of Populations: Methods and Applications, 3rd ed., Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.
11. Likert, R. (1932), Technique for the measurement of attitudes, Archives of Psychology, Vol. 140, pp. 1-55.
12. Little, R.J.A. and Rubin, D.B. (1987), Statistical Analysis with Missing Data, Wiley, New York, NY.
13. McDavid, J.C. and Hawthorn, L.R.L. (2005), Program evaluation and performance, An Introduction to Practice, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
14. Murphy, E., Dingwall, R., Greatbatch, D., Parker, S. and Watson, P. (1998), Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of literature, Health Technology Assessment, Vol. 2 No. 16, pp. 1-274.
15. Raduescu, C., Tan, H.M., Jayaganesh, M., Bandara, W., zur Muehlen, M. and Lippe, S. (2006), A framework of issues in large process modeling projects, paper presented at 14 European Conference on Information Systems, Goetesburg, Sweden.
16. Scriven, M.S. (1991), Evaluation Thesaurus, 4th ed., Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
17. Sedera, W., Rosemann, M. and Gable, G.G. (2002), Measuring process modelling success, paper presented at 10th European Conference on Information Systems, Gdansk, Poland, pp. 331-41.
18. Stufflebeam and Daniel, L. (2000), Foundational models for 21st century program evaluation, in Stufflebeam, D.D., Madaus, G.F. and Kellaghan, T. (Eds), Evaluation Models: Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services Evaluation, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, pp. 33-84.
19. SUPER (2007a), D.2.1 preliminary studies on SUPER methodology, SUPER Deliverable.
20. SUPER (2007b), D.2.2. semantic business process management, SUPER Deliverable.
21. US Dept of the Treasury (2000), CIO council: treasury enterprise architecture framework version 1.0, available at: www.eaframeworks.com/TEAF/teaf.doc (accessed 15 October 2007).
22. van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M. and Weske, M. (2003), Business process management: a survey, Proceedings of the International Conference of Business Process Management, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 26 June.
23. Weske, M. (2007), Business Process Management: Concepts, Languages, Architectures, Springer, Berlin.
24. Yin, R.K. and Campbell, D.T. (2003), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol. 5, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
25. zur Muehlen, M. and Rosemann, M. (2004), Multi-paradigm process management, in Grundspenkis, J. and Kirkova, M. (Eds), Proceedings of the CAISE'04 Workshops, Vol. 2, Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, Riga Technical University, Riga, pp. 169-75.