Does the enteral feeding advancement affect short-term outcomes in very low birth weight infants?

Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition

Volumn 48, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 464-470

  Härtel, Christoph ^a   Haase, Berit ^a   Browning Carmo, Kathryn ^b   Gebauer, Corinna ^c   Kattner, Evelyn ^d   Kribs, Angela ^e   Segerer, Hugo ^f   Teig, Norbert ^g   Wense, Axel Von Der ^h   Wieg, Christian ^h   Herting, Egbert ^a   Göpel, Wolfgang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LÜBECK   (Germany)

^b CHILDREN S HOSPITAL AT WESTMEAD   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^d Children's Hospital Auf der Bult   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

^f Children's Hospital St Hedwig Regensburg   (Germany)

^g RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

^h NONE

Author keywords

Central lines; Enteral feeding; Gram negative; Gram positive; Sepsis; VLBW

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; CATECHOLAMINE; TEICOPLANIN; VANCOMYCIN;

ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS; ARTICLE; ENTERIC FEEDING; ERYTHROCYTE TRANSFUSION; FEMALE; GERMANY; HOSPITAL INFECTION; HUMAN; INFANT; LUNG DYSPLASIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEWBORN INTENSIVE CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEPSIS; TERTIARY HEALTH CARE; THERAPY EFFECT; TREATMENT DURATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY LOW BIRTH WEIGHT;

ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; ENTERAL NUTRITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, PREMATURE; INFANT, VERY LOW BIRTH WEIGHT; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS, NEONATAL; PREGNANCY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEPSIS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

NEGIBACTERIA; POSIBACTERIA;

EID: 67650889124     PISSN: 02772116     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e31818c5fc3     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Kennedy KA, Tyson JE, Chamnanvanikij S. Rapid versus slow rate of advancement of feedings for promoting growth and preventing necrotizing enterocolitis in parenterally fed low-birth-weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000:CD001241.
2. Tyson JE, Kennedy KA, Lucke JF, et al. Dilemmas initiating enteral feedings in high risk infants: how can they be resolved? Semin Perinatol 2007;31:61-73.
3. Rayyis S, Ambalavanan N, Wright L, et al. Randomized trial of "slow" versus "fast" feed advancements on the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants. J Pediatr 1999;134:293-7.
4. Tyson JE, Kennedy KA. Trophic feedings for parenterally fed infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005:CD000504.
5. Caple J, Armentrout D, Huseby V, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of slow versus rapid feeding volume advancement in preterm infants. Pediatrics 2004;114:1597-600.
6. Mihatsch WA, von Schoenaich P, Fahnenstich H, et al. The significance of gastric residuals in the early enteral feeding advancement of extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2002;109:457-9.
7. Cobb BA, Carlo WA, Ambalavanan N. Gastric residuals and their relationship to necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2004;113:50-3.
8. Anderson DM, Kliegman RM. The relationship of neonatal alimentation practices to the occurrence of endemic necrotizing enterocolitis. Am J Perinatol 1991;8:62-7.
9. Berseth CL, Bisquera JA, Paje VU. Prolonging small feeding volumes early in life decreases the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2003; 111:529-34.
10. McKeown RE, Marsh TD, Amarnath U, et al. Role of delayed feeding and of feeding increments in necrotizing enterocolitis. J Pediatr 1992;121:764-70.
11. Caplan MS, Jilling T. The pathophysiology of necrotizing enter-ocolitis. Neoreviews 2001;2:e103-8.
12. Flidel-Rimon O, Friedman S, Lev E, et al. Early enteral feeding and nosocomial sepsis in very low birthweight infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2004;89:F289-92.
13. Cooke RJ, Embleton ND. Feeding issues in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal 2000;83:F215-8.
14. Patole S. Strategies for prevention of feed intolerance in preterm neonates: a systematic review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2005;18:67-76.
15. Ehrenkranz RA, Dusick AM, Vohr BR, et al. Growth in the neonatal intensive care unit influences neurodevelopmental and growth outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2006;117:1253-61.
16. Vohr BR, Wright LL, Dusick AM, et al., Neonatal Research NetworkCenter differences and outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2004;113:781-9.
17. Freeman J, Goldmann DA, Smith NE, et al. Association of intravenous lipid emulsion and coagulase-negative staphylococcal bacteraemia in neonatal intensive care units. N Engl J Med 1990;323:301-8.
18. Avila-Figueroa C, Goldmann DA, Richardson DK, et al. Intravenous lipid emulsions are the major determinant of coagulase-negative staphylococcal bacteremia in very low birth weight newborns. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1998;17:10-7.
19. Hartel C, Schultz C, Herting E, et al. Genetic association studies in VLBW infants exemplifying susceptibility to sepsis-recent findings and implications for future research. Acta Paediatr 2007; 96:158-65.
20. Garcia-Lafuente A, Antolin M, Guarner F, et al. Derangement of mucosal barrier function by bacteria colonizing the rat colonic mucosa. Eur J Clin Invest 1998;28:1019-26.
21. Ronnestad A, Abrahamsen TG, Medbo S, et al. Late-onset septi-cemia in a Norwegian national cohort of extremely premature infants receiving very early full human milk feeding. Pediatrics 2005;115:e269-76.
22. Kelly D, Coutts AG. Early nutrition and the development of immune function in the neonate. Proc Nutr Soc 2000; 59:177-85. Review.
23. Hylander MA, Strobino DM, Pezzullo JC, et al. Association of human milk feedings with a reduction in retinopathy of prematurity among very low birthweight infants. J Perinatol 2001; 21:356-62.
24. Heller CD, O'Shea M, Yao Q, et al., NICHD Neonatal Research NetworkHuman milk intake and retinopathy of prematurity in extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2007;120:1-9.
25. McGuire W, Bombell S. Slow advancement of enteral feed volumes to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008:CD001241.