Intelligent negotiation agents in electronic commerce Applications

Journal of Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 2, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 29-39

  Ng, S C ^a   Sulairnan, M N ^a   Selarnat, M H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY PUTRA MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Automated negotiation; Bayesian belief updating; Genetic based machine learning; Heuristic search

Indexed keywords

EID: 67650851083     PISSN: 19945450     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3923/jai.2009.29.39     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bosse, T. and C.M. Jonker, 2005. Human vs. computer behaviour in multi-issue negotiation. Proceedings of the Rational, Robust and Secure Negotiation Mechanisms in Multi-Agent Systems, Jul. 25, Amsterdam, Netherland, pp: 11-24.
2. Cheng, CB., C.CR Chan and CC Lin, 2005. Buyer-supplier negotiation by fuzzy logic based agents. Proceedings of the Information Teclmology and Applications, ICITA 2005. Third International Conference, Jul. 4-7, Taichung, Taiwan, pp: 137-142.
3. Feldman, S., 1999. The objects of e-commerce. www.research.ibm.comliac/oopsla99-sifkeynote.pdf.
4. Hindriks, K. and D. Tykhonov, 2008. Opponent modeling in automated multi-issue negotiation using Bayesian learning. Proceedings ofthe 7th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, May 12-16, Estori1, Portugal, pp: 331-338.
5. Jonker, C., V. Robu and 1. Treur, 2007. An agent architecture for multi-attribute negotiation using incomplete preference information. Autonomous Agents Multi-Agent Syst., 15: 221-252.
6. Lau, R.Y., 2005. Adaptive negotiation agents for e-business. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Electronic Commerce, Aug. 15-17, New York, USA, pp: 271-278.
7. Lin, R, S. Kraus, 1. Wilkenfeld and 1. Barry, 2006. An automated agent for bilateral negotiation with bOllllded rational agents with incomplete information. http://www.umiacs.umd.edu!~sarit!ArticlesllinetalEcai06.pdf.
8. Lopez-Carmona, M.A. and 1.R Velasco, 2006. An expressive approach to fuzzy constraint based agent purchase negotiation. Proceedings ofthe 5th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, May 8-12, Hakodate, Japan, pp: 429-431.
9. Manisterski, E., R Lin and S. Kraus, 2008. Understanding how people design trading agents over time. Proceedings of the 7th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, May 12-16, Estori1, Portugal, pp: 1593-1596.
10. Moukas, A, G. Zacharia, R. Guttman and P. Maes, 2000. Agent-mediated electronic conunerce: An MIT media laboratory perspective. Int. 1. Electron. Commerce, 4: 5-21.
11. Narayanan, V. and N.R. Jennings, 2006. Learning to negotiate optimally in non-stationary environments. Proceedings of the lOth International Workshop on Cooperative Information Agents, Oct 09, Edinburgh, UK., pp: 1-13.
12. Nissen, M.E., 1997. The commerce model for electronic redesign. http://www.arraydev.com!comrnerce/jip/9702-01.htm
13. Praca, I., M.L. Viamonte, Z. Vale and C. Ramos, 2008. Agent-based simulation of electronic market places with decision support. Proceedings ofthe 2008 ACM SyrnposilllTI on Applied Computing, Mar. 16-20, Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil, pp: 3-7.
14. RahwaIl, I., R. Kowalczyk and H.H. Pham, 2002. Intelligent agents for automated one-to-many e-conunerce negotiation. Proceedings ofthe 25th Australian Conference on Computer Science, 2002 Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, pp: 197-204.
15. Sandhohn, T., 1999. Autornatednegotiation. Conunon. ACM, 42: 84-85.
16. Sirn, K.M., 2007. Relaxed-criteria G-negotiation for grid resource co-allocation. SIGecorn Exch., 6: 37-46.
17. Yokoo, M. and K. Hirayama, 2000. Algorithms for distributed constraint satisfaction: A review. Autonomous Agents Multi-Agent Syst., 3: 185-207.
18. Zeng, D. and K. Sycara, 1998. Bayesian learning in negotiation. Int. 1. Hum. Cornput. Syst., 48: 125-141.