Fiber technology for reliable repair of skeletal muscle

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials

Volumn 90, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 259-266

  Franklin, J E ^a   Marler, J J ^a   Byrne, M T ^b   Melvin, A J ^b   Clarson, S J ^a   Melvin, D B ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

^b Surgical Energetics Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Muscle; PET; Poly(ethylene terephthalate); Polymer; Repair; Surgery

Indexed keywords

COLLAGEN; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; ETHYLENE; FIBERS; FRICTION; HISTOLOGY; POLYETHYLENE TEREPHTHALATES; REPAIR; SURGERY;

CLINICAL PRACTICES; COLLAGEN CONTENT; CONTACT AREAS; CROSS SECTIONAL AREA; FAILURE STRENGTH; FIBER TECHNOLOGY; FRICTIONAL COEFFICIENTS; HEART VALVES; MECHANICAL PERFORMANCE; NORMAL FORCES; PET; RECLOSING; SHEAR FORCE TRANSFER; SKELETAL MUSCLE; SOFT TISSUE; SOLID TISSUES; THEORETICAL LIMITS;

MUSCLE;

POLYETHYLENE TEREPHTHALATE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIMENTAL RABBIT; FIBER; HISTOPATHOLOGY; NONHUMAN; RECTUS ABDOMINIS MUSCLE; SUTURING METHOD; TISSUE REPAIR; WOUND CLOSURE;

ANIMALS; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; RABBITS; SUTURES;

EID: 67650828798     PISSN: 15524973     EISSN: 15524981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31280     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Chauhan SP, Magann EF, Wiggs CD, Barrilleaux PS, Martin JN. Pregnancy after classic cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2002;100:946-950.
2. Turner MJ. Uterine rupture. Best Pact Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2002;16:69-79, Review.
3. Cliby WA. Abdominal incision wound breakdown. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2002;45:507-517.
4. Pavlidis TE, Galatianos IN, Papaziogas BT, Lazaridis CN, Atmatzidis KS, Makris JG, Papaziogas TB. Complete Dehiscence of the abdominal wound and incriminating factors. Eur J Surg 2001;167:351-354.
5. Maxwell GL, Soisson AP, Brittain PC, Harris RA, Scully T, Carlson J. Repair of transversely incised abdominal wall fascia in a rabbit model. Obstet Gynecol 1996;87:65-68. (Pubitemid 26015953)
6. Trumble DR, Melvin DB, Dasika U, Teekell-Taylor L, Magovern JA. Chronic implantation of fibrous artificial tendon demonstrates stability of muscle fixation to metallic motor prosthesis. ASAIO J Abstr 2001;47:163.
7. Melvin DB. A durable, load-bearing muscle-to-prosthesis coupling for circulatory support power. Dissertation for Doctor of Philosophy in Biomedical Engineering. The Ohio State University; 2002.
8. Trumble DR, Melvin DB, Magovern JA. Method for anchoring biomechanical implants to muscle tendon and chest wall. ASAIO J 2002;48:62-70.
9. Melvin DB, Klosterman B, Gramza BR, Byrne MT, Weisbrode SL, Litsky AS, Clarson SJ. A durable load bearing muscle to prosthetic coupling. ASAIO J 2003;49:314-319. (Pubitemid 36570155)
10. Melvin DB, Santamore W, Trumble DR, Magovern JA, Litsky A. A durable load bearing muscle-prosthetic coupling. In: Guldner NW, Klapproth P, Jarvis JC, editors. Cardiac Bioassist 2002. Armonk, NY: Futura Publishing Co. Inc.; 2003. Chapter 11, pp 157-166.
11. Ellis H. Wound healing. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1977;59:382-387.
12. Schessel ES, Ger R, Ambrose G, Kim R. The management of the postoperative disrupted abdominal wall. Am J Surg 2002;184:263-268. (Pubitemid 35279298)
13. Makela JT, Kiviniemi H, Juvonen T, Laitinen S. Factors influencing wound dehiscence after midline laparotomy. Am J Surg 1995;170:387-390.
14. Gislason H, Viste A. Closure of burst abdomen after major gastrointestinal operation-Comparison of different surgical techniques and later development of incisional hernia. Eur J Surg 1999;165:958-961. (Pubitemid 29503062)
15. van't Riet M, Steyerberg EW, Nellensteyn J, Bonjer HJ, Jeekel J. Meta-analysis of techniques for closure of midline abdominal incisions. Brit J Surg 2002;89:1350-1356.
16. Rink AD, Goldschmidt D, Dietrich J, Nagelschmidt M, Vestweber K-H. Negative side-effects of retention sutures for abdominal wound closure. A prospective randomised study. Eur J Surg 2000;166:932-937. (Pubitemid 32002437)
17. Mathes SJ, Steinwald PM, Foster RD, Hoffman WY, Anthony JP. Complex abdominal wall reconstruction: A comparison of flap and mesh closure. Ann Surg 2000;232:586-596.
18. Yuce K. Retention mesh: An alternative to retention sutures. Eur J Surg 1994;160:641-642.
19. Bergman I, Loxley R. New spectrophotometric method for the determination of proline in tissue hydrolyzates. Anal Chem 1970;42:702-706.
20. Berg RA. Determination of 3- and 4-hydroxyproline. Methods Enzymol 1982;82:372-398.
21. Poole GV Jr, Meredith JW, Kon ND, Martin MB, Kawamoto EH, Myers RT. Suture technique and wound-bursting strength. Am Surg 1984;50:569-572.
22. Sauter E, Thibodeaux K, Myers B. Effect of high tension and relaxing incisions on wound healing in rats. South Med J 1985;78:1451-1453. (Pubitemid 16152468)
23. Johnson BW, Scott PG, Brunton JL, Petrik PK Williams HT. Primary and secondary healing in infected wounds: An experimental study. Arch Surg 1982;117:1189-1193.
24. Cengiz Y, Gislason H, Svanes K, Israelsson LAL. Mass closure technique: An experimental study on separation of wound edge. Eur J Surg 2001;167:60-63. (Pubitemid 32066223)
25. Nilsson T. The relative importance of Vicryl and Prolene sutures to the strength of healing abdominal wounds. Acta Chir Scand 1981;147:503-507. (Pubitemid 12250549)
26. Sabiston DC Jr., editor. Davis-Christopher Textbook of Surgery, 11th ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Company; Copyright 1977. pp 330-334.
27. Farrar DJ, Hill JD. A new skeletal muscle linear-pull energy converter ass a power source for prosthetic circulatory support device. J Heart Lung Transplant 1992;11 (suppl.): 341-350.
28. Fung YC. A First Course in Continuum Mechanics, 3rd Edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1994. pp 197-201.