A grounded investigation of genred guidelines in cancer care deliberations

Written Communication

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 320-348

  Teston, Christa B ^a  

^a ROWAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Charter document; Deliberative rhetoric; Genre; Standards of care; Stephen Toulmin; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

EID: 67650603330     PISSN: 07410883     EISSN: 15528472     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0741088309336937     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Barton, E. (1999). Informational and interactional functions of slogans and sayings in the discourse of a support group. Discourse & Society, 10, 461-486.
2. Barton, E. (2000). The interactional practice of referrals and accounts in medical discourse: Expertise and compliance. Discourse Studies, 2, 259-281.
3. Barton, E. (2004). Discourse methods and critical practice in professional communication: The front-stage and back-stage discourse of prognosis in medicine. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 18, 67-111.
4. Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
5. Bazerman, C. (2003). Social forms as habits for action. Journal of the Interdisciplinary Crossroads, 1, 123-142.
6. Dautermann, J. (1997). Writing at good hope: A study of negotiated composition in a community of nurses. Greenwich, UK: Ablex Publishing.
7. Ellingson, L.L. (2003). Interdisciplinary health care teamwork in the clinic backstage. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 31, 93-125.
8. Emerson, R., Fretz, R., & Shaw, L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967/2007). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transaction.
10. McCarthy, L. (1991). A psychiatrist using DSM-III: The influence of a charter document in psychiatry. In C. Bazerman & J. G. Paradis (Eds.), Textual dynamics of the profession (pp. 358-376). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
11. McCarthy, L., & Gerring, J. (1994). Revising psychiatry's charter document. Written Communication, 11, 147-192.
12. Miller, C.R. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 151-167.
13. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: Colon cancer. (2008). Available from www. nccn.org
14. Sanjek, R. (1990). In R. Sanjek (Ed.), Fieldnotes A vocabulary for field notes (pp. 92-138). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
15. Sauer, B. (2003). Rhetoric of risk. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. Schryer, C.F. (1993). Records as genre. Written Communication, 10, 200-234.
17. Segal, J. (2005). Health and the rhetoric of medicine. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
18. Selzer, J. (2004). Rhetorical analysis: Understanding how texts persuade readers. In C. Bazerman & P. Prior (Eds.), What writing does and how it does it (pp. 279-308). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19. Spinuzzi, C. (2003). Tracing genres through organizations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. San Francisco: Cambridge University Press.
21. Toulmin, S. (2003). The uses of argument. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. Winchester, D. P., Brennan, M. F., Dodd, G. D., Jr., Henson, D. E., Kennedy, B. J., Steele, G. D., Jr., et al. (Eds.). (1997). Tumor board case management. Philadelphia: Linppincott-Raven.
23. Witte, S. (1992). Context, Text, Intertext. Written Communication, 9 (2), 237-308.