Interdisciplinary health care teamwork in the clinic backstage

Journal of Applied Communication Research

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 93-117

  Ellingson, Laura L ^a  

^a SANTA CLARA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Backstage communication; Bona fide group; Geriatric team; Health care organization; Health communication; Interdisciplinary communication; Teamwork

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038107328     PISSN: 00909882     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0090988032000064579     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Abramson, J. S., & Mizrahi, T. (1994). Collaboration between social workers and physicians: An emerging typology. In E. Sherman & W. J. Reid (Eds.), Qualitative research in social work (pp. 135-151). New York: Columbia University Press.
2. Abramson, J. S., & Mizrahi, T. (1996). When social workers and physicians collaborate: Positive and negative interdisciplinary experiences. Social Work, 41, 270-281.
3. Adelman, R. D., Greene, M. G., Charon, R., & Friedmann, E. (1992). The content of physician and elderly patient interaction in the primary care encounter. Communication Research, 19, 370-380.
4. Atkinson, P. (1995). Medical talk and medical work. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Barge, J. K., & Keyton, J. (1994). Contextualizing power and social influence in groups. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), Group communication in context: Studies of natural groups (pp. 85-106). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Beisecker, A. E. (1996). Older persons' medical encounters and their outcomes. Research on Aging, 18, 9-31.
7. Berg, M. (1996). Practices of reading and writing: The constitutive role of the patient record in medical work. Sociology of Health and Illness, 18, 499-524.
8. Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Anchor Books.
9. Berteotti, C. R., & Seibold, D. R. (1994). Coordination and role-definition problems in health-care teams: A hospice case study. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), Group communication in context: Studies of natural groups (pp. 107-131). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10. nd ed., pp. 509-535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Cooke, C. (1997). Reflections on the health care team: My experiences in an interdisciplinary program. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 277, 1091-1092.
12. Cooley, E. (1994). Training an interdisciplinary team in communication and decision-making skills. Small Group Research, 25, 5-25.
13. Cott, C. (1998). Structure and meaning in multidisciplinary teamwork. Sociology of Health and Illness, 20, 848-873.
14. Cowen, D. L. (1992). Changing relationships between pharmacists and physicians. American Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 49, 2715-2721.
15. Dollar, N. J., & Merrigan, G. M. (2002). Ethnographic practices in group communication research. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), New directions in group communication (pp. 59-78). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Donnelly, W. J. (1988). Righting the medical record: Transforming chronicle into story. Journal of the American Medical Association, 260, 823-825.
17. Edwards, J., & Smith, P. (1998). Impact of interdisciplinary education in underserved areas: Health professions collaboration in Tennessee. Journal of Professional Nursing, 14, 144-149.
18. Ellingson, L. L. (1998). "Then you know how I feel": Empathy, identification, and reflexivity in fieldwork. Qualitative Inquiry, 4, 492-514.
19. Ellingson, L. L. (2002). The role of companions in the geriatric oncology patient-multidisciplinary health care provider interaction. Journal of Aging Studies, 16, 361-382.
20. Fitch, K. L. (1994). Criteria for evidence in qualitative research. Western Journal of Communication, 58, 32-38.
21. Gage, M. (1998). From independence to interdependence: Creating synergistic healthcare teams. Journal of Nursing Administration, 28(4), 17-26.
22. Glaser, B., & Strauss, B. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
23. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
24. Griffiths, L. (1998). Humour as resistance to professional dominance in community mental health teams. Sociology of Health and Illness, 20, 874-895.
25. Hinojosa, J., Bedell, G. Buchholz, E. S., Charles, J., Shigaki, I. S., & Bicchieri, S. M. (2001). Team collaboration: A case study of an early intervention. Qualitative Health Research, 11, 206-221.
26. Hummert, M. L. & Nussbaum, J. F. (2001). Successful aging, communication, and health. In M. L. Hummert & J. F. Nussbaum (Eds.), Aging, communication, and health: Linking research and practice for successful aging (pp. xi-xix). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27. Jones, R. A. P. (1997). Multidisciplinary collaboration: Conceptual development as a foundation for patient-focused care. Holistic Nursing Practice, 11(3), 8-16.
28. Katriel, T. (1990). 'Griping' as a verbal ritual in some Israeli discourse. In D. Carbaugh (Ed.), Cultural communication and intercultural contact (pp. 99-117). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29. Laine-Timmerman, L. E. (1999). Living the mystery: The emotional experience of floor nursing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.
30. Lammers, J. C., & Krikorian, D. H. (1997). Theoretical extension and operalization of the bona fide group construct with an application to surgical teams. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 25, 17-38.
31. Langhorne, P., Williams, B., Gilchrist, W., & Howie, K. (1993). Do stroke units save lives? Lancet, 342, 395-398.
32. Lichtenstein, R., Alexander, J. A., Jinnett, K., & Ullman, E. (1997). Embedded intergroup relations in interdisciplinary teams: Effects on perceptions of level of team integration. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 33, 413-434.
33. Lindlof, T. R. (1995). Qualitative communication research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34. McCormick, W. C., Inui, T. S., & Roter, D. L. (1996). Interventions in physician-elderly patient interactions. Research on Aging, 18, 103-136.
35. McHugh, M., West, P., Assatly, C., Duprat, L., Niloff, J., Waldo, K., et al. (1996). Establishing an interdisciplinary patient care team: Collaboration at the bedside and beyond. Journal of Nursing Administration, 26(4), 21-27.
36. Meyers, R. A., & Brashers, D. E. (1994). Expanding the boundaries of small group communication research: Exploring a feminist perspective. Communication Studies, 45, 68-85.
37. Opie, A. (1997). Thinking teams thinking clients: Issues of discourse and representation in the work of health care teams. Sociology of Health and Illness, 19, 259-280.
38. Opie, A. (1998). "Nobody's asked me for my view": Users' empowerment by multidisciplinary health teams. Qualitative Health Research, 8, 188-206.
39. Opie, A. (2000). Thinking teams/thinking clients: Knowledge-based teamwork. NY: Columbia University Press.
40. Pike, A. W. (1991). Moral outrage and moral discourse in nurse-physician collaboration. Journal of Professional Nursing, 7, 351-363.
41. Putnam, L. L., & Stohl, C. (1990). Bona fide groups: A reconceptualization of groups in context. Communication Studies, 41, 248-265.
42. Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. New York: Oxford University Press.
43. Resnick, C. (1997). The role of multidisciplinary community clinics in managed care systems. Social Work, 42, 91-98.
44. Saltz, C. (1992). The interdisciplinary team in geriatric rehabilitation. Geriatric Social Work Education, 18, 133-143.
45. Sands, R. (1993). 'Can you overlap here?': A question for an interdisciplinary team. Discourse Processes, 16, 545-564.
46. Sands, R., Stafford, J., & McClelland, M. (1990). 'I beg to differ': Conflict in the interdisciplinary team. Social Work in Health Care, 14(3), 55-72.
47. Satin, D. G. (1994). The interdisciplinary, integrated approach to professional practice with the aged. In D. G. Satin (Ed.), The clinical care of the aged person: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 391-403). New York: Oxford University Press.
48. Schmilt, M. H., Farrell, M. P., & Heinemann, G. D. (1988). Conceptual and methodological problems in studying the effects of interdisciplinary geriatric teams. The Gerontologist, 28, 753-764.
49. Siegel, B. S. (1994). Developing interdisciplinary teams. In D. G. Satin (Ed.), The clinical care of the aged person: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 404-425). New York: Oxford University Press.
50. Stahelski, A. J., & Tsukuda, R. A. (1990). Predictors of cooperation in health care teams. Small Group Research, 21, 220-233.
51. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52. Tannen, D. (1990). You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation. New York: Ballantine Books.
53. Waitzkin, H. (1984). Doctor-patient communication. Journal of the American Medical Association, 252, 2441-2446.
54. Waitzkin, H. (1990). On studying the discourse of medical encounters: A critique of quantitative and qualitative methods and a proposal for reasonable compromise. Medical Care, 28, 473-487.
55. Wear, D. (1997). Privilege in the medical academy: A feminist examines gender, race, and power. New York: Teachers College Press.
56. Wieland, D., Kramer, B. J., Waite, M. S., & Rubenstein, L. Z. (1996). The interdisciplinary team in geriatric care. American Behavioral Scientist, 39, 655-664.
57. Wyatt, N. (2002). Foregrounding feminist theory in group communication research. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), New directions in group communication (pp. 43-56). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
58. Zimmer, J. G., Groth-Junker, A., & McClusker, J. (1985). A randomized controlled study of a home health care team. American Journal of Public Health, 75, 134-141.