DEA advanced models for geometric evaluation of used lathes

WSEAS Transactions on Systems

Volumn 7, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 510-520

  Soares de Mello, João Carlos Correia Baptista ^a   Gomes, Eliane Gonçalves ^b   Meza, Lidia Angulo ^a   Leta, Fabiana Rodrigues ^a  

^a FLUMINENSE FEDERAL UNIVERSITY   (Brazil)

^b EMBRAPA CERRADOS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Data envelopment analysis; Decision aid; Machine tools

Indexed keywords

DECISION AID; GEOMETRICAL ERROR; MULTI-CRITERIA TOOLS; SUPER EFFICIENCY;

DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; DECISION THEORY; LATHES; LINEAR PROGRAMMING; MACHINE SHOPS; MACHINERY; MEASUREMENT ERRORS;

MACHINE TOOLS;

EID: 67650561361     PISSN: 11092777     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. S. Dolinsek, J. Kopac, Linkage between quality assurance tools and machinability criteria, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 118, 2001,
2. J. M. Zhou, M. Andersson, J. E. Ståhl, Identification of cutting errors in precision hard turning process, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 153-154, 2004, pp. 746-750.
3. M. Zhou, C. Zhao, An optimization model and multiple matching heuristics for quality planning in manufacturing systems, Computer & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 42, 2002, pp. 91-101.
4. A. R. Motorcu, A. Güllü, Statistical process control in machining, a case study for machine tool capability and process capability, Materials and Design, Vol. 27, 2006, pp. 364-372.
5. S. W. Lee, J. Y. Song, Construction and Operation of a Knowledge Base on Intelligent Machine Tools, WSEAS Transactions on Systems, Vol. 7, 2008, pp. 148-155.
6. A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, E. Rhodes, Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 2, 1978, pp. 429-444.
7. L. Angulo-Meza, M. P. E. Lins, Review of methods for increasing discrimination in data envelopment analysis, Annals of Operations Research, Vol. 116, 2002, pp. 225-242.
8. N. Adler, L. Friedman, Z. Sinuany-Stern, Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 140, 2002, pp. 249-265.
9. V. V. Podinovski, E. Thanassoulis, Improving discrimination in data envelopment analysis: Some practical suggestions, Journal of Productivity Analysis, Vol. 28, 2007, pp. 117-126.
10. P. Andersen, N. C. Petersen, A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis, Management Science, Vol. 39, 1993, pp. 1261-1264.
11. R. Allen, A. Athanassopoulos, R. G. Dyson, E. Thanassoulis, Weights restrictions and value judgements in data envelopment analysis: evolution, development and future directions, Annals of Operations Research, Vol. 73, 1997, pp. 13-34.
12. T. R. Sexton, R. H. Silkman, A. J. Logan, "Data Envelopment Analysis: Critique and extensions," in Measuring efficiency: An assessment of data envelopment analysis, H. Silkman, Ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Editor, 1986.
13. J. Doyle, R. H. Green, Efficiency and cross-efficiency in DEA derivations, meanings and uses, Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 45, 1994, pp. 567-578.
14. T. Entani, Y. Maeda, H. Tanaka, Dual models of interval DEA and its extensions to interval data, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 136, 2002, pp. 32-45.
15. M. P. E. Lins, L. F. L. Novaes, L. F. L. Legey, Real estate appraisal: A double perspective data envelopment analysis approach, Annals of Operations Research, Vol. 138, 2005, pp. 79-96.
16. L. Angulo-Meza, L. Biondi Neto, J. C. C. B. Soares de Mello, E. G. Gomes, ISYDS - Integrated System for Decision Support (SIAD Sistema Integrado de Apoio a Decisão): A Software Package for Data Envelopment Analysis Model, Pesquisa Operacional, Vol. 25, 2005, pp. 493-503.
17. A. D. Jenning, P. R. Drake, Machine Tool Condition Monitoring Using Statistical Quality Control Charts, International Journal of Machining Tools Manufacturing, Vol. 37, 1997, pp. 1243-1249.
18. R. K. Jain, Engineering Metrology. New Delhi: Khanna Publisher, 1981.
19. C. A. K. Lovell, J. T. Pastor, Radial DEA models without inputs or without outputs, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 118, 1999, pp. 46-51.
20. R. G. Thompson, F. D. Singleton Junior, R. M. Thrall, B. A. Smith, Comparative evaluation for locating a high-energy physics lab in Texas, Interfaces, Vol. 16, 1986, pp. 35-49.
21. L. E. Caporaletti, J. H. Dulá, N. K. Womer, Performance evaluation based on multiple attributes with nonparametric frontiers, Omega, Vol. 27, 1999, pp. 637-645.
22. J. C. C. B. Soares de Mello, E. G. Gomes, L. Angulo-Meza, L. Biondi Neto, Cross Evaluation using Weight Restrictions in Unitary Input DEA Models: Theoretical Aspects and Application to Olympic Games Ranking, WSEAS Transactions on Systems, Vol. 7, 2008, pp. 31-39.
23. T. J. Stewart, Relationships between Data Envelopment Analysis and Multicriteria Decision Analysis, Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 47, 1996, pp. 654-665.
24. F. Farinaccio, A. Ostanello, "Evaluation of DEA Validity as a MCDA/M Tool: Some Problems and Issues," Dipartimento de Informatica, Università di Pisa, Pisa, Italy TR-99-06, 1999.
25. D. Bouyssou, Using DEA as a tool for MCDM: some remarks, Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 50, 1999 1999, pp. 974-978.
26. J. Sarkis, Comparative analysis of DEA as a discrete alternative multiple criteria decision tool, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 123, 2000, pp. 543-557.
27. W. D. Cook, J. Zhu, Modeling Performance Measurement: Applications and Implementation Issues in DEA: Springer, 2005.
28. L. F. A. d. C. Senra, L. C. Nanci, J. C. C. B. Soares de Mello, L. Angulo-Meza, Estudo sobre métodos de seleção de variáveis em DEA, Pesquisa Operacional, Vol. 27, 2007, pp. 191-207.
29. P. H. Lin, Multiple criteria ranking by fuzzy data envelopment analysis, WSEAS Transactions on Computers, Vol. 5, 2006, pp. 810-816.
30. D. V. Derpanis, E. Foundas, Decision's problem with the help of imprecise data envelopment analysis (IDEA), WSEAS Transactions on Systems, Vol. 4, 2005, pp. 745-750.
31. D. V. Derpanis, E. Foundas, The problem of intervals in imprecise data envelopment analysis (IDEA), WSEAS Transactions on Information Science and Applications, Vol. 2, 2005, pp. 1673-1678.
32. J. H. Dulá, Computations in DEA, Pesquisa Operacional, Vol. 22, 2002, pp. 165-182.
33. L. Biondi Neto, M. P. E. Lins, E. G. Gomes, J. C. C. B. Soares de Mello, F. S. Oliveira, Neural data envelopment analysis: A simulation, International Journal of Industrial Engineering: Theory Applications and Practice, Vol. 11, 2004, pp. 14-24.
34. T. R. Anderson, K. Hollingworth, L. Inman, The Fixed Weighting Nature of A Cross-Evaluation Model, Journal of Productivity Analysis, Vol. 17, 2002, pp. 249-255.
35. R. D. Banker, ., H. Chang, The super-efficiency procedure for outlier identification, not for ranking efficient units, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 175, 2006, pp. 1311-1320.
36. M. Thrall, Duality, classification and slacks in DEA, Annals of Operations Research, Vol. 66, 1996,
37. J. Zhu, Super-efficiency and DEA sensitivity analysis, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 129, 2001,
38. R. Farzipoor Saen, Using super-efficiency analysis for ranking technologies, WSEAS Transactions on Mathematics, Vol. 5, 2006, pp. 599-604.
39. J. C. C. B. Soares de Mello, M. P. E. Lins, M. H. C. Soares de Mello, E. G. Gomes, Evaluating the performance of Calculus classes using operational research tools, European Journal Of Engineering Education Vol. 27, 2002, pp. 209-218
40. R. G. Dyson, E. Thanassoulis, Reducing Weight Flexibility in Data Envelopment Analysis, Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 39, 1988, pp. 563-576.
41. Y. Roll, W. D. Cook, B. Golany, Controlling factor weights in DEA, IIE Transactions, Vol. 23, 1991, pp. 2-9.
42. T. R. Sexton, Measuring Efficiency: An assessment of Data Envelopment Analysis. New Directions For Program Evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1986.
43. R. C. Baker, S. Talluri, A closer look at the use of data envelopment analysis for technology selection, Computers & Industrial Engineering, Vol. 32, 1997, pp. 101-108.
44. L. Angulo-Meza, E. G. Gomes, L. Biondi Neto, P. H. G. Coelho, Avaliação do ensino nos cursos de Pós-graduação em engenharia: Um enfoque quantitativo de avaliação em conjunto, Engevista, Vol. 5, 2003, pp. 41-49.
45. J. C. C. B. Soares de Mello, M. P. E. Lins, E. G. Gomes, Construction of a smoothed DEA frontier, Pesquisa Operacional, Vol. 28, 2002, pp. 183-201.
46. J. C. C. B. Soares de Mello, E. G. Gomes, L. Biondi Neto, M. P. E. Lins, Suavização da Fronteira DEA: O caso BCC tridimensional, Investigação Operacional, Vol. 24, 2004, pp. 89-107.
47. M. P. E. Lins, E. G. Gomes, J. C. C. B. Soares de Mello, A. J. R. Soares de Mello, Olympic ranking based on a zero sum gains DEA model, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 148, 2003, pp. 312-322.
48. Y. Yamada, T. Matui, M. Sugiyama, New analysis of efficiency based on DEA, Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan, Vol. 37, 1994, pp. 158-167.
49. T. Entani, H. Tanaka, Improvement of efficiency intervals based on DEA by adjusting inputs and outputs, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 172, 2006, pp. 1004-1017.
50. J. C. C. B. Soares de Mello, L. Angulo-Meza, E. G. Gomes, L. Biondi Neto, Evaluación de la concentración en una ruta aérea brasilera con modelo DEA y frontera invertida, Revista de la Facultad de Ingeniería, Vol. 14, 2006, pp. 64-71.
51. L. Angulo-Meza, J. C. C. B. Soares de Mello, E. G. Gomes, A. J. S. Fernandes, Selecção de variáveis em DEA aplicada a uma análise do mercado de energia elétrica, Investigação Operacional, Vol. 27, 2007, pp. 21-36.
52. C. C. Liu, Applying optimal weights restriction model in analyzing the efficiency of organization, WSEAS Transactions on Mathematics, Vol. 5, 2006, pp. 236-241.
53. J. C. C. B. Soares de Mello, E. G. Gomes, L. Angulo-Meza, M. H. C. Soares de Mello, A. J. R. Soares de Mello, Engineering Post-Graduate Programmes: A Quality and Productivity Analysis, Studies in Educational Evaluation, Vol. 32, 2006, pp. 136-152.
54. X. B. Li, G. R. Reeves, Multiple criteria approach to data envelopment analysis, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 115, 1999, pp. 507-517.
55. J. C. N. Clímaco, J. C. C. B. Soares de Mello, L. Angulo-Meza, "Performance Measurement - From DEA to MOLP," in Encyclopedia of Decision Making and Decision Support Technologies. vol. 2, F. Adam and P. Humphreys, Eds. Hershey: Information Science Reference, 2008, pp. 709-715.