A preliminary investigation of avian comb as a potential biometric marker for identification of poultry

Transactions of the ASABE

Volumn 52, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 991-998

  Corkery, G P ^a   Gonzales Barron, U ^a   Ayalew, G ^a   Ward, S ^a   McDonnell, K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Biometrics; Fourier descriptors; Identification; Image processing; Poultry; Shape characterization

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION RATES; FOOD-PRODUCING ANIMALS; FOURIER DESCRIPTOR; FOURIER DESCRIPTORS; FOURIER TECHNIQUES; IDENTIFICATION; MORPHOLOGICAL IMAGE PROCESSING; MULTIVARIATE DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; OVERLAP FUNCTIONS; POULTRY; PROFILE FEATURES; SHAPE ANALYSIS; SHAPE CHARACTERIZATION; STILL IMAGES; TAMPERPROOF; UNIQUE IDENTIFIERS;

ANIMALS; CONTENT BASED RETRIEVAL; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; FOURIER TRANSFORMS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGING SYSTEMS; MULTIVARIANT ANALYSIS;

BIOMETRICS;

BIOMARKER; BIOMETRY; BIRD; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; FOURIER TRANSFORM; IMAGE PROCESSING; MORPHOLOGY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; POULTRY; SHAPE ANALYSIS;

ANIMALIA; AVES;

EID: 67650523705     PISSN: 21510032     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Ayalew, G., N. M. Holden, and S. M. Ward. 2006. Comparison of simple shape measures and Fourier descriptors as applied to the identification of high-injury-risk glass contaminants in horticultural peat. ASABE Paper No. 065020. St. Joseph, Mich.: ASABE.
2. Ayalew, G., N. M. Holden, and S. M. Ward. 2009. Ranking of risk of injury from glass contaminants using Fourier shape measures of fragment outlines. Biosystems Eng. 102(3): 265-273.
3. Barry, B., U. Gonzales-Barron, F. Butler, K. McDonnell, and S. Ward. 2007. Using muzzle pattern recognition as a biometric approach for cattle identification. Trans. ASABE 50(3): 1073-1080.
4. Burghardt, T., B. Thomas, P. J. Barham, and J. Calic. 2004. Automated visual recognition of individual African penguins. In Proc. 5th Intl. Penguin Conf., Ushuaia, Tierra del Fuego, Argentina.
5. Corkery, G, U. Gonzales-Barron, F. Butler, K. McDonnell, and S. Ward. 2007. A preliminary investigation on face recognition as a biometric identifier of sheep. Trans. ASABE 50(1): 313-320.
6. De Wet, L., E. Vranken, A. Chedad, J.-M. Aerts, J. Ceunen, and D. Berckmans. 2003. Computer-assisted image analysis to quantify daily growth rates of broiler chickens. British Poultry Sci. 44(4): 524-532.
7. Der, G., and B. Everitt. 2002. A Handbook of Statistical Analyses Using SAS. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, Fla.: Chapman and Hall.
8. Fallon, M. 2001. Traceability of poultry and poultry products. Rev. Sci. Tech. (Intl. Off. Epizootics) 20(2): 538-564.
9. Fröschle, H.-K., U. Gonzales-Barron, K. McDonnell, and S. Ward. 2009. Investigation of the potential use of e-tracking and tracing of poultry using linear and 2D barcodes. Computers and Electronics in Agric. 66(2009): 126-132.
10. Gonzales Barron, U., G. Corkery, B. Barry, F. Butler, K. McDonnell, and S. Ward. 2008. Assessment of retinal recognition technology as a biometric method for sheep identification. Computers and Electronics in Agric. 60(2): 156-166.
11. Goodstein, R. E. 1987. An introduction to discriminant analysis. J. Research in Music Educ. 35(1): 7-11.
12. Granlund, G. H. 1972. Fourier preprocessing for hand print character recognition. IEEE Trans. Computers C-21(2): 195-201.
13. Hundal, H. S., S. Rohani, H. C. Wood, and M. N. Pons. 1997. Particle shape characterization using image analysis and neural networks. Powder Tech. 91(3): 217-227.
14. Loftus, R. 2005. Traceability of biotech-derived animals: Application of DNA technology. Rev. Sci. Tech. (Intl. Off. Epizootics) 24(1): 231-242.
15. Marchant, J. M. 2002. Secure animal identification and source verification. Fort Collins, Colo.: Optibrand Ltd.
16. Ristori, E., F. Sendra, E. Nava, and M. Martinez-Morillo. 2001. Interactive segmentation of masses in digitized mammograms: Observer variability and discriminative applications. Intl. Congress Series 1230: 553-559.
17. Rosenfeld, A., and E. Johnston. 1973. Angle detection on digital curves. IEEE Trans. Computers C-22(9): 875-878.
18. Rosin, P. 2003. Assessing the behaviour of polygonal approximation algorithms. Pattern Recog. 36(2): 505-518.
19. Schwarcz, H. P., and K. C. Shane. 1969. Measurement of particle shape by Fourier analysis. Sedimentology 13(3-4): 213-231.
20. Shadduck, J. A., and B. L. Golden. 2002. Retinal imaging in secure identification and source verification of livestock. In Proc. ID/INFO Expo 2002. Colorado Springs, Colo.: National Institute for Animal Agriculture.
21. Smith, G. C., K. E. Belk, J. A. Scanga, J. N. Sofos, and J. D. Tatum. 2000. Traceback, traceability, and source verification in the U.S. beef industry. Research report. Fort Collins, Colo.: Colorado State University, Department of Animal Sciences. In Proc. XXI World Buiatrics Congress, Punta del Este, Uruguay.
22. Thomas, M. C., R. J. Wiltshire, and A. T. Williams. 1995. The use of Fourier descriptors in the classification of particle shape. Sedimentology 42(4): 635-645.
23. Wettimuny, R., and D. Penumadu. 2004. Application of Fourier analysis to digital imaging for particle shape analysis. J. Computing in Civil Eng. 18(1): 2-9.
24. Zahn, C. T., and R. Z. Roskies. 1972. Fourier descriptors for plane closed curves. IEEE Trans. Computers C-21(3): 269-281.