A preliminary investigation on face recognition as a biometric identifier of sheep

Transactions of the ASABE

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 313-320

  Corkery, Gerard P ^a   Gonzales Barron, Ursula A ^a   Butler, Francis ^a   McDonnell, Kevin ^a   Ward, Shane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Biometrics; Face recognition; Identification; Sheep; Traceability

Indexed keywords

BIOMETRIC IDENTIFIERS; COSINE DISTANCE CLASSIFIERS; SHEEPS; TRACEABILITY;

ALGORITHMS; BIODIVERSITY; BIOMETRICS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

FACE RECOGNITION;

ALGORITHM; BIOMETRY; HOLISTIC APPROACH; IDENTIFICATION METHOD; IMAGING METHOD; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; SHEEP;

OVIS ARIES;

EID: 33947714096     PISSN: 21510032     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bartlett, M. S., J. R. Movellan, and T. J. Sejnowski. 2002. Face recognition by independent component analysis. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 13(6): 1450-1463.
2. Bell, A. J., and T. J. Sejnowski. 1995. An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution. Neural Comput. 7(6): 1129-1159.
3. Bell, A. J., and T. J. Sejnowski. 1997. The independent components of natural scenes are edge filters. Vision Res. 37(23): 3327-3338.
4. Cardoso, J. F. 1997. Infomax and maximum likelihood for blind source separation. IEEE Signal Processing Letters 4(4): 112-114.
5. Cendrillón, P. 1999. Real-time face recognition using eigenfaces. BSc thesis. Brisbane, Australia: University of Queensland, Department of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering.
6. Cheng, J., Q. Liu, H. Lu, and Y. W. Chen. 2006. Ensemble learning for independent component analysis. Pattern Recognition 39(1): 81-88.
7. Delac, K., and M. Grgic. 2004. A survey of biometric recognition methods. In Proc. 46th Intl. Symp. Electronics in Marine. Zadar, Croatia: Croatian Society of Electronics in Marine.
8. De Luis García, R., C. Alberola López, O. Aghzout, and J. Ruiz Alzola. 2003. Biometric identification systems. Signal Processing 83(12): 2539-2557.
9. Draper, B. A., K. Back, M. S. Bartlett, and J. R. Beveridge. 2003. Recognizing faces with PCA and ICA. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 91(1-2): 115-137.
10. Dziuk, P. 2003. Positive, accurate animal identification. Animal Reprod. Sci. 79(3-4): 319-323.
11. Edwards, D. S., and A. M. Johnston 1999. Welfare implications of sheep ear tags. Vet. Record 144(22): 603-606.
12. Edwards, D. S., A. M. Johnston, and D. U. Pfeiffer. 2001. A comparison of commonly used ear tags on the ear damage of sheep. Animal Welfare 10: 141:151.
13. González, R. C., R. E. Woods, and S. L. Eddins. 2004. Digital Image Processing Using Matlab. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson Prentice Hall.
14. Heseltine, T., N. Pears, and J. Austin. 2002. Evaluation of image pre-processing techniques for eigenface-based face recognition. In Proc. 2nd Intl. Conf. Image and Graphics, 677-685. Bellingham, Wash.: SPIE. Available at: www.cs.york.ac.uk/~tomh. Accessed 23 January 2006.
15. Jiménez Gamero, I., G. Dorado, A. Muñoz Serrano, M. Analla, and A. Alonso Moraga. 2006. DNA microsatellites to ascertain pedigree-recorded information in a selecting nucleus of Murciano-Granadina dairy goats. Small Ruminant Res. 65(3): 266-273.
16. Liu, C., and H. Weschler. 1999. Comparative assessment of independent component analysis (ICA) for face recognition. In Proc. 2nd Intl. Conf. Audio and Video Based Biometric Person Authentication, 211-216. Washington, D. C. Available at: www.face-rec.org/algorithms/ICA/liu99comparative.pdf.
17. Loftus, R. 2005. Traceability of biotech-derived animals: application of DNA technology. Rev. Sci. Tech. Off. Int. Epiz. 24(1): 231-242.
18. Moon, H., and P. J. Phillips. 2001. Computational and performance aspects of PCA-based face recognition algorithms. Perception 30(3): 303-321.
19. Raschke, A., S. Strich, S. Huppke, M. Neugebauer, E. Geuther, W. Bertling, B. Walders, C. Reiser, and J. Hess. 2006. Induction and detection of long-lasting peptide-specific antibody responses in pigs and beef cattle: A powerful technology for tracing meat processing chains from stock farmers to sales counters. Food Control 17(1): 65-74.
20. Rusk, C. P., Blomeke, C. R., Balschweid, M. A., Elliot, S. J., and Baker, D. 2006. An evaluation of retinal imaging technology for 4-H beef and sheep identification. J. Extension 44(5). Available at: www.joe.org/joe/ 2006october/a7.shtml.
21. Shakhnarovich, G., and B. Moghaddam. 2004. Face recognition in subspaces. In Handbook of Face Recognition, 141-168. S. Z. Li and A. K. Jain, eds. New York, N.Y.: Springer Verlag.
22. Smith, G. C., J. D. Tatum, K. E. Belk, J. A. Scanga, T. Grandin, and J. N. Sofos. 2005. Traceability from a U.S. perspective. Meat Sci. 71(1): 174-193.
23. Turk, M., and A. Pentland. 1991. Eigenfaces for recognition. J. Cognitive Neurosci. 3(1): 71-86.
24. Yuen, P. C., and J. H. Lai. 2002. Face representation using independent component analysis. Pattern Recognition 35(6): 1247-1257.