Knowledge interdependence with the partner, accuracy of mutual knowledge model and computer-supported collaborative learning

European Journal of Psychology of Education

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 129-144

  Molinari, Gaëlle ^a,c   Sangin, Mirweis ^b   Dillenbourg, Pierre ^b   Nüssli, Marc Antoine ^b  

^a Fondation Formation Universitaire A Distance   (Switzerland)

^b EPFL   (Switzerland)

^c Centre d'Etudes de Sierre   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Collaborative script; Computer supported collaborative learning; Knowledge interdependence; Peer knowledge modelling

Indexed keywords

EID: 67650504443     PISSN: 02562928     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03173006     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5/(6), 1173- 1182.
2. Bromme, R., Jucks, R., & Runde, A. (2005). Barriers and biases in computer-mediated expert-layperson-communication. In R. Bromme, F.W. Hesse, & H. Spada (Eds.), Barriers, biases and opportunities of communication and cooperation with computers and how they may be overcome (pp. 89-118). New York: Springer.
3. Buchs, C, & Butera, F. (2001). Complementarity of information and quality of relationship in cooperative learning. Social Psychology of Education, 4,335-357.
4. Buchs, C, Butera, F., & Mugny, G. (2004). Resource interdependence, student interactions and performance in cooperative learning. Educational Psychology, 24(1), 291-314.
5. Chi, M.T.H., Siler, S., & Jeong, H. (2004). Can tutors monitor students' understanding accurately? Cognition and Instruction, 22, 363-387.
6. Clark, H.H., & Murphy, G.L. (1982). Audience design in meaning and reference. In J.-F.L. Ny & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Language and comprehension. New York: North Holland.
7. de Vries, E., Lund, K., & Baker, M. (2002). Computer-mediated epistemic dialogue: Explanation and argumentation as vehicles for understanding scientific notions. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(1), 63-103.
8. Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1-19). Oxford: Elsevier.
9. Dillenbourg, P., & Jermann, P. (2007). Designing integrative scripts. In F. Fischer, H. Mandl, J. Haake, & I. Kollar (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning - Cognitive, computational, and educational perspectives (pp. 275-301). Computer-supported collaborative learning series. New York: Springer.
10. Fitzgerald, J.T., White, C.B., & Gruppen, L.D. (2003). A longitudinal study of self-assessment accuracy. Medical Education, 37,645-649
11. Horton, W.S., & Gerrig, R.J. (2005). Conversational common ground and memory processes in language production. Discourse Processes, 40(1), 1-35.
12. Krauss, R.M., & Fussell, S.R. (1991). Perspective-taking in communication: Representations of others' knowledge in reference. Social Cognition, 9,2-24.
13. Lambiotte, J.G., Dansereau, D.F., O'Donnell, A.M., Young, M.D., Skaggs, L.P., Hall, R.H., & Rocklin, T.R. (1987). Manipulating cooperative scripts for teaching and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79,424-430.
14. Mac Iver, D. (1987). Classroom factors and student characteristics predicting students' use of achievement standards during ability self-assessment. Child Development, 58, 1258-1271.
15. Molinari, G., Sangin, S., Nilssli, M.A., & Dillenbourg, P. (2008). Effects of knowledge interdependence with the partner on visual and action transactivity in collaborative concept mapping. In G. Kanselaar, J. van Merrig̈nboer, P. Kirschner, & T. de Jong (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2008) (pp. 91-98). Utrecht, The Netherlands: ICLS.
16. Nickerson, R.S. (1999). How we know - and sometimes misjudge - what others know: Imputing one's own knowledge to others. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 737-759.
17. Nova, N., Wehrle, T., Goslin, J., Bourquin, Y., & Dillenbourg, P. (2007). Collaboration in a multi-user game: Impacts of an awareness tool on mutual modeling. Multimedia tools and Applications, 32(2), 161-183.
18. Nückles, M., & Sürz, A. (2006). The assessment tool. A method to support asynchronous communication between computer experts and laypersons. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(5), 917-940.
19. Pickering, M., & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 169-226.
20. Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C.E. O'Malley (Ed.), Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 69-97). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
21. Sangin, S., Molinari, G., Nilssli, M.A., & Dillenbourg, P. (2008a). How learners use awareness cues about their peer's knowledge? Insights from synchronized eye-tracking data. In G. Kanselaar, J. van Merrignboer, P. Kirschner, & T. de Jong (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2008) (pp. 287- 294). Utrecht, The Netherlands: ICLS.
22. Sangin, M., Molinari, G., Dillenbourg, P., & Nilssli, M.A. (2008b). / know what you know: The mediating effect of the partner's knowledge modeling on distant collaborative learning performance in dyads. Manuscript submitted for publication.
23. Schober, M.F., & Brennan, S.E. (2003). Processes of interactive spoken discourse: The role of the partner. In A.C. Graesser, M.A. Gernsbacher, & S.R. Goldman (Eds.), Handbook of discourse processes (pp. 123-164). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24. Van den Bossche, P. (2006). Minds in teams: The influence of social and cognitive factors on team learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
25. Wegner, D.M. (1995). A computer network model of human transactive memory. Social Cognition, 13, 1-21.
26. Wittwer, J. (2005). Improving instructional explanations in netbased communication between experts and laypersons. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Freiburg University, Freiburg, Germany.
27. Lund, K., Molinari, G., Séjourné, A., & Baker, M.J. (2007). How do argumentation diagrams compare when student pairs use them as a means for debate or as a tool for representing debate? International Journal of Computer- Supported Collaborative Learning, 2, 73-295.
28. Molinari, G., & Tapiero, I. (2007). Integration of new domain-related states and events from texts and illustrations by subjects with high and low prior-knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 17(3), 304-321.
29. Molinari, G., Sangin, M., Niissli, M.-A., & Dillenbourg, P. (2008). Effects of knowledge interdependence with the partner on visual and action transactivity in collaborative concept mapping. In G. Kanselaar, J. van Merriënboer, P. Kirschner, & T. de Jong, (Eds.), International Perspectives in the Learning Sciences: Cre8ing a Learning World, Proceedings of the Eight International Conference for the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2008). Utrecht, The Netherlands: ICLS.
30. Molinari, G., Sangin, M., Niissli, M.-A., & Dillenbourg, P. (2008). When co-learners work on complementary texts: Effects on outcome convergence. In P. Dillenbourg & M. Specht (Eds.), Times of Convergence. Technologies across Learning Contexts (Third European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, EC-TEL 2008, Maastricht, September 18-19, 2008, Proceedings). (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5192, pp. 304-311).Berlin: Springer.
31. Sangin, M., Molinari, G., Niissli, M.-A., & Dillenbourg, P. (2008). Knowing what the peer knows: The differential effect of knowledge awareness on collaborative learning performance of asymmetric pairs. In P. Dillenbourg & M. Specht (Eds.), Times of Convergence. Technologies across Learning Contexts (Third European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, EC-TEL 2008, Maastricht, September 18-19, 2008, Proceedings). (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5192, pp. 384-394). Berlin: Springer.
32. Sangin, M., Molinari, G., Niissli, M.-A., & Dillenbourg, P. (2008). How learners use awareness cues about their peer knowledge? Insights from synchronized eye-tracking data. In G. Kanselaar, J. van Merrienboer, P. Kirschner, & T. de Jong (Eds.), International Perspectives in the Learning Sciences: Cre8ing a Learning World, Proceedings of the Eight International Conference for the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2008). Utrecht, The Netherlands: ICLS.
33. Sangin, M., Dillenbourg, P., Rebetez, C, Btrancourt, M., & Molinari, G. (2008). The effects of animations on verbal interaction in computer supported collaborative learning. Journal of Computer-Assisted Learning, 24(5), 394-406.
34. Sangin, M., Molinari, G., Dillenbourg, P., Rebetez, C, & B&rancourt, M. (2006). Collaborative learning with animated pictures: The role of verbalizations. In S.A. Barab, K.E., Hay, N. Butler-Songer, D.T. Hickey (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference of the Learning Sciences 2006 (pp. 667-673). Bloomington, IN (USA): International Society of the Learning Sciences.