The anterior N1 component as an index of modality shifting

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 21, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 1653-1669

  Töllner, Thomas ^a   Gramann, Klaus ^a,b   Müller, Hermann J ^a,c   Eimer, Martin ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b Swartz Center for Computational Neuroscience   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRODE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; SENSORY STIMULATION; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; TACTILE STIMULATION; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL STIMULATION; DISSOCIATION; FOOT; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOPHYSICS;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; CEREBRAL CORTEX; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

FOOT PEDALS; MOTOR RESPONSE; ONE DIMENSION; SENSORY MODALITY; TARGET STIMULUS; TARGETS DETECTION; VISUAL MODALITIES; WEIGHT SETTING;

EID: 67650456232     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: 15308898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21108     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Ahissar, M., & Hochstein, S. (2004). The reverse hierarchy theory of visual perceptual learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 457-464.
2. Budd, T. W., Barry, R. J., Gordon, E., Rennie, C., & Michie, P. T. (1998). Decrement of the N1 auditory event-related potential with stimulus repetition: Habituation vs. refractoriness. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 31, 51-68.
3. Cohen, R., & Rist, F. (1992). The modality shift effect. Further explorations at the crossroads. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 658, 163-181.
4. Dyson, B. J., & Quinlan, P. T. (2002). Within- and between-dimensional processing in the auditory modality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1483-1498.
5. Eimer, M., & Van Velzen, J. (2002). Crossmodal links in spatial attention are mediated by supramodal control processes: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology, 39, 437-449.
6. Farah, M. J., Wong, A. B., Monheit, M. A., & Morrow, L. A. (1989). Parietal lobe mechanisms of spatial attention: Modality-specific or supramodal? Neuropsychologia, 27, 461-470.
7. Found, A., & Müller, H. J. (1996). Searching for unknown feature targets on more than one dimension: Investigating a "dimension- weighting" account. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 88-101.
8. Gehring, W. J., Goss, B., Coles, M. G. H., Meyer, D. E., & Donchin, E. (1993). A neural system for error detection and compensation. Psychological Science, 4, 385-390.
9. Gondan, M., Lange, K., Rösler, F., & Röder, B. (2004). The redundant target effect is affected by modality switch costs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 307-313.
10. Gramann, K., Töllner, T., Krummenacher, J., Müller, H. J., & Eimer, M. (2007). Brain electrical correlates of dimensional weighting: An ERP study. Psychophysiology, 44, 277-292.
11. Hanewinkel, R., & Ferstl, R. (1996). Effects of modality shift and motor response shift on simple reaction time in schizophrenia patients. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105, 459-463.
12. Hochstein, S., & Ahissar, M. (2002). View from the top: Hierarchies and reverse hierarchies in the visual system. Neuron, 36, 791-804.
13. Jacobsen, T., & Schröger, E. (2003). Measuring duration mismatch negativity. Clinical Neurophysiology, 114, 1133-1143.
14. Kleinsorge, T. (1999). Response repetition benefits and cots. Acta Psychologica, 103, 295-310.
15. Lamme, V. A. F., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2000). The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing. Trends in Neurosciences, 23, 11, 571-579.
16. Levit, R., Sutton, S., & Zubin, J. (1973). Evoked potential correlates of information processing in psychiatric patients. Psychological Medicine, 3, 487-494.
17. Loveless, N. E. (1983). The orienting response and evoked potentials in man. In D. Siddle (Ed.), Orienting and habituation: Perspectives in human research (pp. 71-101). London: John Wiley.
18. Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (1994). Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features. Memory & Cognition, 22, 657-672.
19. Manuzza, S. (1980). Cross-modal reaction time and schizophrenic attentional deficit. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 6, 654-675.
20. Mortier, K., Theeuwes, J., & Starreveld, P. A. (2005). Response selection modulates visual search within and across dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 542-557.
21. Müller, H. J., Heller, D., & Ziegler, J. (1995).Visual search for singleton feature targets within and across feature dimensions. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 1-17.
22. Müller, H. J., & Krummenacher, J. (2006). Locus of dimension weighting: Pre-attentive or post-selective? Visual Cognition, 14, 490-513.
23. Müller, H. J., Krummenacher, J., & Heller, D. (2004). Dimension-specific inter-trial facilitation in visual search for pop-out targets: Evidence for a top-down modulable visual short-term memory effect. Visual Cognition, 11, 577-602.
24. Müller, H. J., & O'Grady, R. (2000). Object-based selection is subject to domain-based attentional limitations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1332-1351.
25. Müller, H. J., Reimann, B., & Krummenacher, J. (2003). Visual search for singleton feature targets across dimensions: Stimulus- and expectancy-driven effects in dimensional weighting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 1021-1035.
26. Näätänen, R., Jacobsen, T., & Winkler, I. (2005). Memory-based or afferent processes in mismatch negativity (MMN): A review of the evidence. Psychophysiology, 42, 25-32.
27. Nelson, D. A., & Lassman, F. M. (1968). Effects of intersignal interval on the human auditory evoked response. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 44, 1529-1532.
28. Pollmann, S. (2004). Anterior prefrontal cortex contributions to attention control. Experimental Psychology, 51, 270-278.
29. Pollmann, S., Mahn, K., Reimann, B., Weidner, R., Tittgemeyer, M., Preul, C., et al. (2007). Selective visual dimension weighting deficit after left lateral frontopolar lesions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 365-374.
30. Pollmann, S., Weidner, R., Müller, H. J., Maertens, M., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2006). Selective and interactive neural correlates of visual dimension changes and response changes. Neuroimage, 30, 254-265.
31. Pollmann, S., Weidner, R., Müller, H. J., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2000). A fronto-posterior network involved in visual dimension changes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 480-494.
32. Pollmann, S., Weidner, R., Müller, H. J., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2006). Neural correlates of dimension weighting. Visual Cognition, 14, 877-897.
33. Rist, F., & Cohen, R. (1988). Effects of modality shift on event related potentials and reaction times of chronic schizophrenics. In R. Johnson, J. Rohrbaugh, & R. Parasuraman (Eds.), Current research in event-related brain potentials. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
34. Rodway, P. (2005). The modality shift effect and the effectiveness of warning signals in different modalities. Acta Psychologica, 120, 199-226.
35. Roeber, U., Berti, S., Widmann, A., & Schröger, E. (2005). Response repetition vs. response change modulates behavioral and electrophysiological effects of distraction. Cognitive Brain Research, 22, 451-456.
36. Spence, C., Nicholls, M., & Driver, J. (2001). The cost of expecting events in the wrong sensory modality. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 330-336.
37. Tiitinen, H., May, P., Reinikainen, K., & Näätänen, R. (1994). Attentive novelty detection in humans is governed by pre-attentive sensory memory. Nature, 372, 90-92.
38. Töllner, T., Gramann, K., Müller, H. J., Kiss, M., & Eimer, M. (2008). Electrophysiological markers of visual dimension changes and response changes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 531-542.
39. Töllner, T., Zehetleitner, M., Gramann, K., & Müller, H. J. (submitted). Top-down weighting of visual dimensions: Behavioural and electrophysiological evidence.
40. Verleger, R., & Cohen, R. (1978). Effects of certainty, modality shift and guess outcome on evoked potentials and reaction times in chronic schizophrenics. Psychological Medicine, 8, 81-93.
41. Vogel, E. K., & Luck, S. J. (2000). The visual N1 component as an index of a discrimination process. Psychophysiology, 37, 190-203.
42. Wang, Y., Cui, L., Wang, H., Tian, S., & Zhang, X. (2004). The sequential processing in visual feature conjunction mismatch in the human brain. Psychophysiology, 41, 21-29.
43. Weidner, R., Pollmann, S., Müller, H. J., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2002). Top-down controlled visual dimension weighting: An event-related fMRI study. Cerebral Cortex, 12, 318-328.
44. Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202-238.