Construct and differential item functioning in the assessment of prescription opioid use disorders among american adolescents

Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

Volumn 48, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 563-572

  Wu, Li Tzy ^a   Ringwalt, Christopher L ^b   Yang, Chongming ^c   Reeve, Bryce B ^d   Pan, Jeng Jong ^e   Blazer, Dan G ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b PACIFIC INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH AND EVALUATION   (United States)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^e VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

DSM IV; Item response theory; Nosology; Opioid use disorders

Indexed keywords

CODEINE; DEXTROPROPOXYPHENE; HYDROCODONE; HYDROCODONE BITARTRATE PLUS PARACETAMOL; METHADONE; MORPHINE; OPIATE; OXYCODONE; PARACETAMOL; PERCOCET; PERCODAN; PETHIDINE; TYLOX; NARCOTIC ANALGESIC AGENT; PRESCRIPTION DRUG;

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; CHILD; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; DEMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; DRUG TOLERABILITY; DRUG USE; ETHNICITY; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL DISEASE; OPIATE ADDICTION; PAIN; PRESCRIPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; RACE DIFFERENCE; SCHOOL CHILD; SEX; SEX DIFFERENCE; SYMPTOM; UNITED STATES; WITHDRAWAL SYNDROME; CHILD BEHAVIOR; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SOCIOECONOMICS;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; ANALGESICS, OPIOID; CHILD; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; MALE; OPIOID-RELATED DISORDERS; PRESCRIPTION DRUGS; PSYCHOMETRICS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 67650340554     PISSN: 08908567     EISSN: 15275418     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e31819e3f45     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Fourth Edition. Text Revision. Washington: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2000.
2. Edwards G, Gross MM. Alcohol dependence: provisional description of a clinical syndrome. Br Med J. 1976;11058-1061.
3. Edwards G. The Alcohol Dependence Syndrome: a concept as stimulus to enquiry. Br J Addict. 1986;81:171-183.
4. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Third Edition. Text Revision. Washington: American Psychiatric Publishing; 1987.
5. Helzer JE, Bucholz KK, Gossop M. A dimensional option for the diagnosis of substance dependence in DSM-V. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2007;Suppl 16:S24-S33.
6. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies. Results from the 2007 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings. Rockville: Office of Applied Studies, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services; 2008.
7. Wu LT, Pilowsky DJ, Patkar AA. Non-prescribed use of pain relievers among adolescents in the United States. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008;94:1-11.
8. Wu LT, Ringwalt CL, Mannelli P, Patkar AA. Prescription pain reliever abuse and dependence among adolescents: a nationally representative study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008;47:1020-1029.
9. Gillespie NA, Neale MC, Prescott CA, Aggen SH, Kendler KS. Factor and item-response analysis DSM-IV criteria for abuse of and dependence on cannabis, cocaine, hallucinogens, sedatives, stimulants and opioids. Addiction. 2007;102:920-930.
10. Saha TD, Chou SP, Grant BF. Toward an alcohol use disorder continuum using item response theory: results from the National Epide-miologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Psychol Med. 2006;36:931-941.
11. Hartman CA, Gelhorn H, Crowley TJ, et al. Item response theory analysis of DSM-IV cannabis abuse and dependence criteria in adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008;47:165-173.
12. Embretson SE, Reise SP. Item Response Theory for Psychologists. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2000.
13. Baker FB. Item Response Theory: Parameter Estimation Techniques. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1992.
14. Martin CS, Chung T, Kirisci L, Langenbucher JW. Item response theory analysis of diagnostic criteria for alcohol and cannabis use disorders in adolescents: implications for DSM-V. J Abnorm Psychol. 2006;115: 807-814.
15. Gelhorn H, Hartman C, Sakai J et al. an item response theory analysis of the diagnostic process for DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence in adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008;47: 1329-1339.
16. Crowley TJ. Adolescents and substance-related disorders: research agenda to guide decisions on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-V). Addiction. 2006;101(Suppl 1):164-172.
17. Grant BF, Harford TC, Muthén BO, Yi HY, Hasin DS, Stinson FS. DSM-IV alcohol dependence and abuse: further evidence of validity in the general population. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007;86:154-166.
18. Chen CY, Anthony JC. Possible age-associated bias in reporting of clinical features of drug dependence: epidemiological evidence on adolescent-onset marijuana use. Addiction. 2003;98:71-82.
19. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Results from the 2006 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings. Rockville: Office of Applied Studies, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services; 2007.
20. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010: Understanding and Improving Health. 2nd ed. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office; 2000.
21. Turner CF, Ku L, Rogers SM, Lindberg LD, Pleck JH, Sonenstein FL. Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: increased reporting with computer survey technology. Science. 1998;280:867-873.
22. Research Triangle Institute. SUDAAN User's Manual, Release 9.0. Research Triangle Park: Research Triangle Institute; 2006.
23. Muth'en BO, Muth'en LK. Mplus: Statistical Analysis with Latent Variables. Los Angeles: Muth'en & Muth'en; 2007.
24. Cattell RB. The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behav Res. 1996;1:245-276.
25. Reeve BB, Hays RD, Bjorner JB et al. Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: Plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Medical Care. 2007;45:S22-S31.
26. Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KA, Long JS, eds. Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1993:136-162.
27. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equation Model. 1999;6:1-55.
28. Takane Y, de Leeuw J. On the relationship between item response theory and factor analysis of discretized variables. Psychometrika. 1987;52: 393-408.
29. Lynskey MT, Agrawal A. Psychometric properties of DSM assessments of illicit drug abuse and dependence: results from the National Epidemio-logic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC). Psychol Med. 2007;37:1345-1355.
30. Boyd CJ, Esteban McCabe S, Teter CJ. Medical and nonmedical use of prescription pain medication by youth in a Detroit-area public school district. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006;81:37-45.
31. Boyd CJ, McCabe SE, Cranford JA, Young A. Prescription drug abuse and diversion among adolescents in a southeast Michigan school district. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161:276-281.