Investigating the predictive capabilities of discrete choice models in the presence of spatial effects

Papers in Regional Science

Volumn 88, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 367-388

  Robertson, Richard D ^a   Nelson, Gerald C ^a,b   De Pinto, Alessandro ^c  

^a INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF REDLANDS   (United States)

Author keywords

Discrete choice models; Land use; Spatial econometrics

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DISCRETE CHOICE ANALYSIS; ECONOMETRICS; ESTIMATION METHOD; LAND USE PLANNING; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; PREDICTION; SPATIAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 67650172641     PISSN: 10568190     EISSN: 14355957     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1435-5957.2009.00247.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Akaike H (1981) Likelihood of a model and information criteria. Journal of Econometrics 16: 3-14
2. Anselin L (1988) Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
3. Anselin L (2003) Spatial externalities, spatial multipliers, and spatial econometrics. International Regional Science Review 26: 153-166
4. Anselin L, Bera A (1988) Spatial dependence in linear regression models with an introduction to spatial econometrics. In Ullah A, Giles D (eds) Handbook of applied economic statistics. Marcel Dekker: New York
5. Baltagi BH, Egger P, Pfaffermayr M (2007) Estimating models of complex FDI: Are there third-country effects? Journal of Econometrics 140: 260-281
6. Barrett GF, Donald SG (2003) Consistent tests for stochastic dominance. Econometrica 71: 71-104
7. Bell KP, Bockstael NE (2000) Applying the generalized-moments estimation approach to spatial problems involving microlevel data. Review of Economics and Statistics 82: 72-82
8. Besag J (1974) Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 36: 192-236
9. Bhat C, Guo J (2004) A mixed spatially correlated logit model: Formulation and application to residential choice modeling. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 38: 147-168
10. Carrion-Flores C, Irwin E (2004) Determinants of residential land-use conversion and sprawl at the rural-urban fringe. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86: 889-904
11. Case AC (1991) Spatial patterns in household demand. Econometrica 59: 953-965
12. Chomitz K, Gray D (1996) Roads, land use, and deforestation: A spatial model applied to Belize. World Bank Economic Review 10: 487-512
13. Cropper M, Puri J, Griffths C (2001) Predicting the location of deforestation: The role of roads and protected areas in North Thailand. Land Economics 77: 172-186
14. Dugundji E, Walker J (2005) Discrete choice with social and spatial network interdependencies -an empirical example using mixed generalized extreme value models with field and panel effects. Transportation Research Record 1921: 70-78
15. Fleming M (2004) A review of techniques for estimating spatially dependent discrete choice models. In Anselin L, Florax R (eds) Advances in Spatial Econometrics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin
16. Greene WH (2000) Econometric analysis 4th ed. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
17. Hanushek EA, Kain JF, Markman JM, Rivkin SG (2003) Does peer ability affect student achievement? Journal of Applied Econometrics 18: 527-544
18. Hunt LM, Boots B, Kanaroglou PS (2004) Spatial choice modelling: New opportunities to incorporate space into substitution patterns. Progress in Human Geography 28: 746-766
19. Kullback S, Leibler R (1951) On information and sufficiency. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 22: 79-86
20. Miyamoto K, Vichiensan V, Shimomura N, Páez A (2004) Discrete choice model with structuralized spatial effects for location analysis. Transportation Research Record, Travel Demand and Land Use 1898: 183-190
21. Mohammadian A, Haider M, Kanaroglou PS (2005) Incorporating spatial dependencies in random parameter discrete choice models. In proceeding CDROM of the 84th Annual Transportation Research Board Meeting, January 2005, Washington, DC
22. Nelson G, Harris V, Stone S (2001) Deforestation, land use, and property rights: Empirical evidence from Darien, Panama. Land Economics 77: 187-205
23. Nelson G, Hellerstein D (1997) Do roads cause deforestation? Using satellite images in econometric analysis of land use. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79: 80-88
24. Newburn DA, Berck P, Merenlender AM (2006) Habitat and open space at risk of land-use conversion: Targeting strategies for land conservation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 88: 28-42
25. Páez A (2006) Exploring contextual variations in land use and transport analysis using a probit model with geographical weights. Journal of Transport Geography 14: 167-176
26. Páez A, Scott DM (2004) Spatial statistics for urban analysis: A review of techniques with examples. GeoJournal 61: 53-67
27. Sherman M, Apanasovich T, Carroll R (2006) On estimation in binary autologistic spatial models. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 76: 167-179
28. Shroder M (1995) Games the states don't play: Welfare benefits and the theory of fiscal federalism. Review of Economics and Statistics 77: 183-191
29. Staal S, Baltenweck I, Waithaka M, deWolff T (2002) Location and uptake: Integrated household and GIS analysis of technology adoption and land use, with application to smallholder dairy farms in Kenya. Agricultural Economics 27: 295-315