Credit-based congestion pricing travel, land value, and welfare impacts

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1864, 2004, Pages 45-53

  Kalmanje, Sukumar ^a   Kockelman, Kara M ^a  

^a The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOBILE DRIVERS; DATA REDUCTION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PUBLIC POLICY; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; TRANSPORTATION;

CREDIT-BASED CONGESTION PRICING (CBCP); MARGINAL COST PRICING (MCP); ROAD CONGESTIONS; TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM);

VALUE ENGINEERING;

EID: 10044268740     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/1864-07     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. Scheibal, S. New Planning Group Kicks-Off Effort with Survey on What Area Residents Want. Austin American Statesman, Aug. 26, 2002.
2. Knickerbocker, B. Forget Crime - But Please Fix the Traffic. Christian Science Monitor, Feb. 16, 2000.
3. Fimrite, P. Traffic Tops List of Bay Area Banes, Weak Economy Is Number 2 Bane, Survey Shows. San Francisco Chronicle, sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2002/12/05/MN51835.DTL#sections. Accessed Dec. 5, 2002.
4. Schrank, D., and T. Lomax. The Urban Mobility Report. Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, Tex., 2002.
5. Vickrey, W. Pricing in Urban and Suburban Transport. American Economic Review, Vol. 52, No. 2, 1963, pp. 452-465.
6. Vickrey, W. Congestion Theory and Transport Investment. American Economic Review, Vol. 59, No. 2, 1969, pp. 251-260.
7. Arnott, R., A. de Palma, and R. Lindsey. A Structural Model of Peak-Period Congestion: A Traffic Bottleneck with Elastic Demand. American Economic Review, Vol. 83, 1993, pp. 161-79.
8. Button, K. J., and E. T. Verhoef, eds. Road Pricing, Traffic Congestion and the Environment: Issues of Efficiency and Social Feasibility. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, United Kingdom, 1998.
9. Small, K. A., and J. Van. The Value of "Value Pricing" of Roads: Second-Best Pricing and Product Differentiation. Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 49, 2001, pp. 310-336.
10. Hyman, G., and, L. Mayhew. Optimizing the Benefits of Road User Charging. Transport Policy, Vol. 9, 2002, pp. 189-207.
11. Litman, T. London Congestion Pricing: Implications for Other Cities. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, Victoria, BC, Canada, 2003. www.vtpi. org/london.pdf. Accessed July 7, 2003.
12. Sullivan, E., with K. Bakely, J. Daly, J. Gilpin, K. Mastako, K. Small, and J. Yan. Continuation Study to Evaluate the Impacts of the SR 91 Value-Priced Express Lanes: Final Report. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, California Polytechnic State University at San Luis Obispo, 2000. ceenve.ceng.calpoly.edu/sullivan/SR91/. Accessed Dec. 13, 2002.
13. Zupan, J. M., and A. F. Perrotta. An Exploration of Motor Vehicle Congestion Pricing in New York. Regional Plan Association, New York, 2003. www.rpa.org/pdf/RPA_Congestion_Pricing_NY.pdf. Accessed Nov. 5, 2003.
14. Deloitte Research. Combating Gridlock: How Pricing Road Use Can Ease Congestion. Deloitte Research, New York, 2003. www.deloitte. com/dtt/cda/doc/content/dtt_research_Gridlock_110303.pdf. Accessed Nov. 10, 2003.
15. Arnott, R., and K. Small. The Economics of Traffic Congestion. American Scientist, Vol. 82, 1994, pp. 447-455.
16. Dial, R. B. Minimal Revenue Congestion Pricing Part I: A Fast Algorithm for the Single-Origin Case. Transportation Research B, Vol. 33, No. 3, 1999, pp. 189-202.
17. Viegas, J. M. Making Urban Road Pricing Acceptable and Effective: Searching for Quality and Equity in Urban Mobility. Transport Policy, Vol. 8, No. 4, 2001, pp. 289-294.
18. Rothengatter, W. How Good Is First Best? Marginal Cost and Other Pricing Principles for User Charging in Transport. Transport Policy, Vol. 10, 2003, pp. 121-130.
19. DeCorla-Souza, P. FAIR Lanes: A New Approach to Managing Traffic Congestion. ITS Quarterly, Vol. VIII, No. 2, 2000.
20. Daganzo, C. F. A Pareto Optimum Congestion Reduction Scheme. Transportation Research B, Vol. 29, No. 2, 1995, pp. 139-154.
21. Nakamura, K., and K. Kockelman. Congestion Pricing and Roadspace Rationing: An Application to the San Francisco Bay Bridge Corridor. Transportation Research A, Vol. 36, No. 5, 2002, pp. 403-417.
22. Kockelman, K., and S. Kalmanje. Credit-Based Congestion Pricing: A Policy Proposal and the Public's Response. Presented at 10th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research (Lucerne, Switzerland, Aug. 10-14, 2003); Transportation Research A, 2005 (forthcoming).
23. Kockelman, K., and S. Kalmanje. Credit-Based Congestion Pricing: A Policy Proposal and the Public's Response. Presented at 10th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research (Lucerne, Switzerland, Aug. 10-14, 2003); Transportation Research A, 2005 (forthcoming).
24. Austin Travel Study. City of Austin, Tex., 1998.
25. CAMPO. 1997 Base Year Travel Demand Model Calibration Summary for Updating the 2025 Long Range Plan. Transportation Planning and Programming Division, Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, 2000.
26. CAMPO Mode Choice Model Application Draft. Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization, Austin, Tex., 2001.
27. Travel Demand Modeling with TransCAD 4.5. Caliper Corporation, Newton, Mass., 2002.
28. GAUSS Mathematical and Statistical System. Aptech Systems Inc., Maple Valley, Wash., 1996.
29. Martin, W. A., and N. A. McGuckin. NCHRP Report 365: Travel Estimation Techniques for Urban Planning. National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998.
30. Traffic Assignment Manual. Bureau of Public Roads, 1964, Washington, D.C.
31. Krishnamurthy, S. M.S. thesis. University of Texas at Austin, 2002.
32. Krishnamurthy, S., and K. M. Kockelman. Propagation of Uncertainty in Transportation Land Use Models: An Investigation of DRAM-EMPAL and UTTP Predictions in Austin, Texas. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1831, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 219-229.
33. Parry, I. W. H., and A. Bento. Revenue Recycling and the Welfare Effects of Road Pricing. Scandinavian Joumal of Economics, Vol. 103, No. 4, 2001, pp. 645-671.
34. Kockelman, K. M. Effects of Location Elements on Home Purchase Prices and Rents in San Francisco Bay Area. In Transportation Research Record 1606, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 40-50.
35. Srour, I. M., K. M. Kockelman, and T. P. Dunn. Accessibility Indices: Connection to Residential Land Prices and Location Choices. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1805, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 25-34.
36. Waddell, P., and F. Nourzad. Incorporating Nonmotorized Mode and Neighborhood Accessibility in an Integrated Land Use and Transportation Model System. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1805, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 119-127.