Influence of environment and mitochondrial heritage on the ecological characteristics of fish in a hybrid zone

PLoS ONE

Volumn 4, Issue 6, 2009, Pages

  Stolzenberg, Nicolas ^a   Nguyen The, Bénédicte ^a   Salducci, Marie Dominique ^a   Cavalli, Laurent ^a  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BREEDING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVELOPMENTAL STAGE; ECOLOGICAL GENETICS; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FEMALE; FISH; GEOMETRY; GROWTH RATE; HYBRID ZONE; HYBRIDIZATION; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; MALE; MATING; MATURATION; NATURAL SELECTION; NONHUMAN; SEX DIFFERENCE; SYMPATRY; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ECOLOGY; ENVIRONMENT; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MITOCHONDRION; PATHOLOGY; PHENOTYPE; THEORETICAL MODEL; TIME;

NASUS; TOXOSTOMA;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; ECOLOGY; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; FISHES; MALE; MITOCHONDRIA; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, GENETIC; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PHENOTYPE; SEX FACTORS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 67650164890     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005962     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Albert V, Jónsson B, Bernatchez L (2006) Natural hybrids in Atlantic eels (Anguilla Anguilla, A. rostrata): evidence for successful reproduction and fluctuating abundance in space and time. Mol Ecol 15: 1903-1916.
2. Dobzhansky T (1937) Genetics and the Origin of Species. New York: Columbia University Press.
3. Rhymer JM, Simberloff D (1996) Extinction by hybridization and introgression. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27: 83-109.
4. Huxel GR (1999) Rapid displacement of native species by invasive species: effects of hybridization. Biol Conserv 89: 143-152.
5. Templeton AR (1981) Mechanisms of speciation - a population genetic approach. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 12: 23-48.
6. Rieseberg LH, Archer MA, Wayne RK (1999) Transgressive segregation, adaptation and speciation. Heredity 83: 363-372.
7. Anderson E, Stebbins GL (1954) Hybridization as an evolutionary stimulus. Evolution 8: 378-388.
8. Lewontin RC, Birch LC (1966) Hybridization as a source of variation for adaptation to new environments. Evolution 20: 315-336.
9. Arnold ML (1992) Natural hybridization as an evolutionary process. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 23: 237-261.
10. Seehausen O (2004) Hybridization and adaptative radiation. Trends Ecol Evol 19: 198-207.
11. Arnold ML (1997) Natural Hybridization and Evolution. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. pp 232.
12. Arnold ML (2004) Transfer and origin of adaptations through natural hybridization: were Anderson and Stebbins right? Plant Cell 16: 562-570.
13. Dowling TE, Secor CL (1997) The role of hybridization and introgression in the diversification of animals. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 28: 593-619.
14. Barton NH (2001) The role of hybridization in evolution. Mol Ecol 10: 551-568.
15. Mallet J (2005) Hybridization as an invasion of the genome. Trends Ecol Evol 20: 229-237.
16. Dowling TE, Demarais D (1993) Evolutionary significance of introgressive hybridization in cyprinid fishes. Nature 362: 444-446.
17. Crespin L, Berrebi P, Lebreton JD (1999) Asymmetrical introgression in a freshwater fish hybrid zone as revealed by a morphological index of hybridization. Biol J Linn Soc 67: 57-72.
18. Chenuil A, Crespin L, Pouyaud L, Berrebi P (2000) Movements of adult fish in a hybrid zone revealed by microsatellite genetic analysis and capture-recapture data. Fresh Biol 43: 121-131.
19. Vamosi SM, Hatfield T, Schluter D (2000) A test of ecological selection against young-of-the-year hybrids of sympatric sticklebacks. J Fish Biol 57: 109-121.
20. Klumb RA, Bozek MA, Frie RV (2001) Validation of three back-calculation models by using multiple oxytetracycline marks formed in the otoliths and scales of bluegill x green sunfish hybrids. Can J Fish and Aquat Sci 58: 352-364.
21. Rundle HD (2002) A test of ecologically dependent postmating isolation between sympatric sticklebacks. Evolution 56: 322-329.
22. Dobzhansky T (1951) Genetics and the Origin of Species. New York: Columbia University Press. pp 364.
23. Kimball S, Campbell DR, Lessin C (2008) Differential performance of reciprocal hybrids in multiple environments. J Ecol 96: 1306-1318.
24. Fitzpatrick BM, Shaffer HB (2007) Hybrid vigor between native and introduced salamanders raises new challenges for conservation. Proc Natl Acad of Sci USA 40: 15793-15798.
25. Shields JL, Barnes P, Heath DD (2008) Growth and survival differences among native, introduced and hybrid blue mussels (Mytilus spp.): genotype, environment and interaction effects. Mar Biol 154: 919-928.
26. Crespin L, Berrebi P, Lebreton JD (2002) Spatially varying natural selection in a fish hybrid zone. J Fish Biol 61: 696-711.
27. Aldridge G (2005) Variation in frequency of hybrids and spatial structure among Ipomopsis (Polemoniaceae) contact sites. New Phytologis 167: 279-288.
28. Grant BR, Grant PR (1996) High survival of Darwin's finch hybrids: effects of beak morphology and diets. Ecology 77: 500-509.
29. Williams JH, Boecklen WJ, Howard DJ (2001) Reproductive processes in two oak (Quercus) contact zones with different levels of hybridization. Heredity 87: 680-690.
30. Das J (2006) The role of mitochondrial respiration in physiological and evolutionary adaptation. Bioessays 28: 890-901.
31. Willett CS (2006) Deleterious epistatic interactions between electron transport system protein-coding loci in the copepod Tigriopus californicus. Genetics 173: 1465-1477.
32. Dykens JA, Davis RE, Moos WH (1999) Introduction to mitochondrial function and genomics. Drug Dev Res 46: 2-13.
33. Ellison CK, Burton RS (2006) Disruption of mitochondrial function in interpopulation hybrids of Tigriopus californicus. Evolution 60: 1382-1391.
34. Ryan MT, Hoogenraad NJ (2007) Mitochondrial-nuclear communications. Ann Rev Biochem 76: 701-722.
35. Costedoat C, Pech N, Salducci MD, Chappaz R, Gilles A (2005) Evolution of mosaic hybrid zone between invasive and endemic species of Cyprinidae through space and time. Biol J Linn Soc 85: 135-155.
36. Nelva-Pasqual A (1985) Biogéographie, démographie et écologie de Chondrostoma nasus nasus (L. 1758) Nase (Poisson, Téléostéen, Cyprinidé). PhD, Université Claude-bernard-LyonI, France. pp 365.
37. Keith P, Allardi J (2001) Atlas des poissons d'eau douce de France. Paris: MNHN. pp 388.
38. Wotton RJ (1999) Ecology of teleost fishes. Dordrecht The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp 386.
39. Abdoli A, Pont D, Sagnes P (2007) Intrabasin variations in age and growth of bullhead: the effects of temperature. J Fish Biol 70: 1224-1238.
40. Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press. pp 262.
41. Kovac V, Copp GH, Francis MP (1999) Morphometry of the stone loach, Barbatula barbatula: do mensural characters reflect the species' life history thresholds? Env Biol Fishes 56: 105.
42. Costedoat C, Pech N, Chappaz R, Gilles A (2007) Novelties in Hybrid Zones: crossroads between population genomic and ecological approaches. Plos ONE, Available: http://www.plosone.org/article/ info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0000357 via the internet.
43. Golzan RE, Copp GH, Tourenq JN. Comparison of growth plasticity in the laboratory and field, and implications for the onset of juvenile development in sofie, Chondrostoma toxostoma. Environ Biol Fishes 56: 153-165.
44. Francis RICC (1990) Back-calculation of fish length: a critical review. J Fish Biol 36: 883-902.
45. Von Bertalanffy L (1957) Quantitative laws in metabolism and growth. Q Rev Biol 32: 217-231.
46. Schnutte J (1981) A versatile growth model with statistically stable parameters. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 38: 1128-1140.
47. Seber GAF, Wild CJ (1989) Nonlinear regression. Applied probability and statistics. New York: Wiley. pp 765.
48. Robert C (1992) L'analyse statistique bayesienne. Paris: Economica. pp 393.
49. Reese CS, Calvin JA, George JC, Tarpley J (2001) Estimation of foetal growth and gestation in bowhead whales. J Am Stat Assoc 455: 915-923.
50. Winbugs version 1.42, copyright WinBUGS 1996-2007: Imperial College and Medical Research Council, UK. http://www.mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk/bugs.
51. Barnejee S, Carlin BP, Gelfand AE (2004) Hierarchical modelling and analysis of spatial data. London: Chapman & Hall. pp 472.
52. Bruslé J, Quignard JP (2001) Biologie des poissons d'eau douce européens. Paris: Lavoisier Tec. et Doc. pp 625.
53. Ricker WE (1975) Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. Canada: Fisheries and Marine Service. pp 382.
54. Folkvord A, Mosegaard H (2002) Age and growth analysis. In: Panfili J, Troadec H, Pontual H, de Pontual H, Wright PJ, eds (2002) Manual of fish sclerochronology. Brest: Ifremer-IRD coedition. pp 146-166.
55. Pinheiro JC, Bates DM (2000) Mixed-effects models in S and S-plus. New York: Springer Verlag. pp 528.
56. Dryden I, Mardia K (1998) Statistical shape analysis. New-York (USA): John Wiley and Sons. pp 347.
57. Monti L, Baylac M, Lalanne-Cassou B (2001) Elliptic Fourier analysis of the form of genitalia in two Spodoptera species and their hybrids (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Biol J Linn Soc 72: 391-400.
58. Everitt B (2005) An R and S-plus companion to multivariate analysis. London: Springer-Verlag. pp 221.
59. Philippart JC (1980) Démographie du Hotu, Chondrostoma nasus (Linné) (Téléostéi:Cyprinidae) dans l'Ourthe (bassin de la Meuse, Belgique). Ann Soc Zool Belg 110: 199-219.
60. Chappaz R, Brun G, Olivari G (1989) New data about biology and ecology of a little studied fish-Chondrostoma toxostoma (Vallot, 1836) Comparison with nase, Chondrostoma nasus (L., 1766). C R Acad Sciences series (III) 5: 181-186.
61. Gozlan RE (1998) Environmental biology and morphodynamics of the Sofie Chondrostoma toxostoma (cyprinidae), with emphasis on early development. France: PhD Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse. pp 196.
62. Hatfield T (1997) Genetic divergence in adaptive characters between sympatric species of stickleback. Am Nat 149: 1009-1029.
63. Bernatchez L, Chouinard A, Lu GQ (1999) Integrating molecular genetics and ecology in studies of adaptive radiation: whitefish, Coregonus sp., as a case study. Biol J Linn Soc 68: 173-194.
64. Hatfield T, Schluter D (1999) Ecological speciation in sticklebacks: environment-dependent hybrid fitness. Evolution 53: 866-873.
65. Hagen J, Taylor EB (2000) Resource partitioning as a factor limiting gene flow in hybridizing populations of Dolly Varden char (Salvelinus malma) and bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58: 2037-2046.
66. Ellison CK, Burton RS (2008) Interpopulation hybrid breakdown maps to the mitochondrial genome. Evolution 62: 631-638.
67. Dowling DK, Friberg U, Lindell J (2008) Evolutionary implications of non-neutral mitochondrial genetic variation. Trends Ecol Evol 23: 546-554.
68. Harrison JS, Burton RS (2006) Tracing hybrid incompatibilities to single amino acid substitutions. Mol Biol Evol 23: 559-564.
69. Ballard WO, Melvin RG, Katewa SD, Maas K (2007) Mitochondrial DNA variation is associated with measurable differences in life-history traits and mitochondrial metabolism in Drosophila simulans. Evolution 61: 1735-1747.
70. Webb PW, Weihs D (1986) Functional locomotor morphology of early life history stages of fishes. Trans Am Fish Soc 115: 115-127.
71. Keckeis H (2001) Influence of river morphology and current velocity conditions on spawning site selection of Chondrostoma nasus (L.). Arch Hydrobiol 135: 341-356.
72. Maier KJ, Zeh M, Ortlepp J, Zbinben S, Hefti D (1995) Distribution et reproduction des espèces du genre Chondrostoma en Suisse: le nase ( C. nasus), la sofie (C. toxostoma), la savetta (C. soetta). OFEFP 53. Available: http://www.bafu.admin.ch/php/ modules/shop/files/pdf/phpPpEAEF.pdf via the Internet.
73. Pritchar VL, Lawrence J, Butlin RK, Krause J (2001) Shoal choice in zebrafish, Danio rerio: the influence of shoal size and activity. Anim Behav 62: 1085-1088.
74. Ward AJW, Krause J (2001) Body length assortative shoaling in the European minnow Phoxinus phoxinus. Anim Behav 62: 617-621.
75. Ward AJW, Axford S, Krause J (2002) Mixed-species shoaling in fish: the sensory mechanisms and costs of shoal choice. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52: 182-187.
76. Ahnelt H, Keckeis H (1994) Breeding tubercles and spawning behaviour in the nase, Chondrostoma nasus (L). (Pisces, Cyprinidae) - a correlation? Ichthyiol Explor Fresh 5: 321-330.
77. Bleeker W, Hurka H (2001) Introgressive hybridization in Rorippa (Brassicaceae): gene flow and its consequences in natural and anthropogenic habitats. Mol Ecol 10: 2013-2022.
78. Watano Y, Kanai A, Tani N (2004) Genetic structure of hybrid zones between Pinus pumila and P. parviflora var. Pentaphylla (Pinaceae) revealed by molecular hybrid index analysis. Am J Bot 91: 65-72.
79. Bouchard P, Chappaz R, Cavalli L, Brun G (1998) Influence of environmental variables on the growth of Leuciscus cephalus (Linnaeus 1766), in the River Durance, South-east France. Ann Limnol 34: 193-200.
80. Robinson BW, Wilson DS, Margosian AS (2000) A pluralistic analysis of character release in pumpkinseed sunfish (Lepomis gibbosus). Ecology 81: 2799-2812.
81. Caumul R, Polly PD (2005) Phylogenetic and environmental components of morphological variation: skull, mandible, and molar shape in marmots (Marmota, Rodentia). Evolution 59: 2460-2472.
82. Lusk S (1967) Population dynamics of Chondrostoma nasus (Linnnaeus, 1758) in the Rokytná river. Acta Sc Nat Brno 1: 473-522.
83. Vater M (1997) Age and growth of the undermouth Chondrostoma nasus in the Slovak stretch of the Danube river. Biologia (Bratisl) 52: 653-661.