Spiral response-cascade hypothesis - Intrapersonal responding-cascade in gaze interaction

HRI 2008 - Proceedings of the 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction: Living with Robots

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 319-326

  Yoshikawa, Yuichiro ^a   Yamamoto, Shunsuke ^a   Sumioka, Hidenobu ^a   Ishiguro, Hiroshi ^a   Asada, Minoru ^a  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cascade effect; Feelings about communication; Psychological experiment with robots; Responsive behavior

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION PARTNERS; COMMUNICATION ROBOT; CONTROLLED NOT; FEELINGS ABOUT COMMUNICATION; GAZE INTERACTION; HUMAN COMMUNICATIONS; PSYCHOLOGICAL EXPERIMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL EXPERIMENT WITH ROBOTS;

COMMUNICATION; EXPERIMENTS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS;

HUMAN ROBOT INTERACTION;

EID: 67650152974     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1349822.1349864     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. A. Arita, K. Hiraki, T. Kanda, and H. Ishiguro. Can we talk to robots? ten-month-old infants expected interactive humanoid robots to be talked to by persons. Cognition, 95:B49-B57, 2005.
2. J. N. Bailenson and N. Yee. Digital chameleons: Automatic assimilation of nonverbal gestures in immersive virtual environments. Psychological Science, 16:814-819, 2005.
3. A. Damasio. Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, And the Human Brain. Grosset/Putnam, 1994.
4. J. Driver, G. Davis, P. Ricciardelli, P. Kidd, E. Maxwell, and S. Baron-Cohen. Gaze perception triggers reflexive visuospatial orienting. Visual Cognition, 6:509-540, 1999.
5. T. Farroni, E. M. Mansfield, C. Lai, and M. H. Johnson. Infants perceiving and acting on the eyes: Tests of an evolutionary hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 85:199-212, 2003.
6. G. Gergely and G. Csibra. Teleological reasoning in infancy: the naïve theory of rational action. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7(7):287-292, 2003.
7. J. Goetz, S. Kiseler, and A. Powers. Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation. In The 12th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2003.
8. P. Haggard, S. Clark, and J. Kalogeras. Voluntary action and conscious awareness. Nature Neuroscience, 5(4):382-385, 2002.
9. H. Ishiguro and M. Asada. Humanoid and android science. IEEE Intelligent Systems, pages 74-76, 2006.
10. S. Johnson, V. Slaughter, and S. Carey. Whose gaze will infants follow? the elicitation of gaze following in 12-month-olds. Developmental Science, 1(2):233-238, 1998.
11. K. Kamewari, M. Kato, T. Kanda, H. Ishiguro, and K. Hiraki. Six-and-a-half-month-old children positively attribute goals to human action and to humanoid-robot motion. Cognitive Development, 20:303-320, 2005.
12. T. Kanda, H. Ishiguro, M. Imai, and T. Ono. Development and evaluation of interactive humanoid robots. Proceedings of IEEE, 92(11):1839-1850, 2004.
13. T. Kanda, T. Miyashita, T. Osada, Y. Haikawa, and H. Ishiguro. Analysis of humanoid appearances in human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2005.
14. A. N. Melzoff. Understanding the intentions of others: Re-enactment of intended acts by 18-month-old children. Developmental Psychology, 31(5):838-850, 1995.
15. B. Robins, P. Dickerson, P. Stribling, and K. Dautenhahn. Robot-mediated joint attention in children with autism. Interaction Studies, 5(2):161-198, 2004.
16. W. Sato and S. Yoshikawa. Spontaneous facial mimicry in response to dynamic facial expressions. In Proceedings of 2005 4th IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning, pages 13-18, 2005.
17. J. Seyama and R. S. Nagayama. Eye direction afftereffect. Psychological Research, 70:59-67, 2006.
18. M. Shimada, T. Minato, S. Itakura, and H. Ishiguro. Evaluation of android using unconscious recognition. In Proceedings of the 6th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, 2006.
19. S. Shimojo, C. Simion, E. Shimojo, and C. Scheier. Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference. Nature NeuroScience, 6:1317-1322, 2003.
20. F. Yamaoka, T. Kanda, H. Ishiguro, and N. Hagita. How contingent should a communication robot be. In Proceedings of ACM 1st Annual Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 313-320, 2006.
21. Y. Yoshikawa, K. Shinozawa, and H. Ishiguro. Social reflex hypothesis on blinking interaction. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pages 725-730, 2007.
22. Y. Yoshikawa, K. Shinozawa, H. Ishiguro, N. Hagita, and T. Miyamoto. Responsive robot gaze to interaction partner. In Proceedings of Robotics: Science and Systems II, 2006.